Actor Sudeep needs no introduction. He is one of the finest actors of Kannada cinema, who has made his presence felt in other industries also. Most recently seen in a multilingual sports drama called Pailwan (2019), Sudeep is presently looking forward to the release of his high-profile Hindi film Dabangg 3.
The actor, who continues stacking up a great resume of work, is new to the highly profitable Bollywood franchise which has superstar Salman Khan and Sonakshi Sinha fronting the cast since 2010. Recently, Eastern Eye caught up with Sudeep in Mumbai and talked to him about his experience of stepping into the world of Dabangg, how he bagged the part, the kind of roles that he loves to do and much more. Excerpts…
How excited or nervous are you ahead of the release of Dabangg 3?
After so many years in the industry, I don’t think I should be thinking a lot. One should go with one’s heart. I thought a lot earlier as to how to craft myself or how to groom myself, but I think after the industry has offered me so much, time is again giving me an opportunity to work with certain people. It is my perspective. They may have hundred and one reasons to call few people, not call few people, but then my perspective says, you know, when time is offering you such beautiful moments, you should grab them and cherish them because I am not going to lose anything. I don’t think I am a hero, and I do this and that. I don’t think about it.
I didn’t think much when I accepted my first role. I had no options anyway. So, it was Salman Khan who is somebody I have seen from the beginning. Today, time is just throwing something to me. I never will have the intention to overtake certain people in life, never will I have a chance to draw line with equities. There is a chance to stand next to him and work and be submissive in certain things. So just do it and enjoy the work.
Who approached you for the film?
Sohail Khan is the main guy. He is very close to me from beginning. Very adamant he was. He didn’t ask me. He just told me that I was doing this part.
After seeing you in Baahubali: The Beginning (2015), we thought we would see more of you in Bahubali: The Conclusion (2017).
I don’t know why I was not in Bahubali: The Conclusion as I didn’t get a call. I didn’t think much why was I not there. Basically, Prabhas was the main hero. I think only Rajamouli can answer that question. I never got a call. Rajamouli does a lot of homework. He will not do something on a random basis.
Weren’t you informed that you would not be there in Bahubali: The Conclusion?
Why should I sit around waiting for the information? They are the makers. They had their own reasons to cast me in the first part. They must have all the reasons not to call me for the second part. There won’t be anything personal in that.
Which is more comfortable for you: positive or negative roles?
There is nothing like a comfort zone. So, I get excited. When I get excited, I do it. If I don’t get excited, there is nothing to do in it. It’s like a meat. Something is not exciting me, I can’t push myself because it is in front of me, and if it is something nice, I would probably have a bite of it. I won’t think twice about it. For me, when I did Makkhi (2012) or Eega for Rajamouli, he narrated the script in about 20 seconds. He just told me that there is a couple. When you start liking the girl, and you kill the boy. And he returns as a fly and wants to take revenge from you. So, this is my story, this is all he said.
In that moment, what came to me, in my mind, was the film Batman. I didn’t find any difference between both the films. He is the Batman, masked always, because he has no value when he is out of the outfit. The outfit is what makes him Batman. I do something which will excite the crowd as a content. So, I guess, I just went by it.
You are a director, actor, singer and producer down south. How do you multi-task so efficiently?
You have no idea what is it like. This is a cinema part. This has got nothing to do with personal talent. I don’t think I am that talented to be doing all these things. It is a just a curiosity to know things and wanting to do things in my life. I think one or two films I have directed. I produced my own directorial, and sometimes I directed because suddenly the directors who were supposed to do the film, went back. Something happened and I came in as a second choice. That also has happened. I recently learned carpentry. I like to do carpentry. There is nothing that I don’t try. It’s about practice and what we like to do.
Have you seen the first two instalments of the Dabangg franchise?
Frankly speaking, my offering to the film has got nothing to do with them. As a viewer, I watched the films. Dabangg (2010) was fabulous because it had a genre which not many people had touched before. Approach to the script was something which had not happened before. So, there was a lot of uniqueness in Dabangg, like the background score, imaginary, the character called Chulbul Pandey and sarcasm being his forte, the way he speaks, etc. So, there are certain good things about the film which had to be there in the second part obviously. But those two films have nothing to do with this film. For me, this is another film and a film which features Salman Khan and has something that excited me. One day I will look back and see that these were the people I worked with. I have a set of films which has given me a platform, but I guess we all need a little bit of vacation, we all need a little bit of journey in our lives where we go and come back home happily. Trust me, these kinds of journeys have always made me richer. I got to know more people. I got to learn more things.
Did you get to learn anything from Salman Khan?
I got to understand that how it is to be as simple as him after being a superstar. He is very grounded.
The title track of the film received flak from a certain section of the audience because priests are dancing in the background and that, according to some, not how the culture works. Do you think people have become more critical nowadays?
Everybody has got the right to voice their opinions. If they are on any platform, they will speak. If they are paying for your tickets, they have the right to speak. It’s about how you take it. Each one has got a perspective. They have got the right to opinion. Each one has got the right to reaction. If you ask me, I am a person who will not react because if I have done something, I accept it. I may have gone wrong maybe. The way you said it is a little bit harsh. That’s you, why should I react to your harshness? I will take what you said. If I find it sensible, I will accept it. If I don’t find it sensible, I will leave it with you. I guess being nice, being polite is there in you. Also, for what reason you are trying to be harsh with us we wouldn’t know.
So, when they have so many choices of words, they will use certain words to put across their opinions. Again, that reflects only their personality. I don’t think we should give much importance to that. It takes time to start a war. You are not heading anywhere, and if there is something or a mistake, the team would have learnt. But if there is no mistake, I think the team would have been aware of it too. I don’t think we should give importance to these things because it has got nothing to do with us. Yes, if there is something to do with the society, if it is an awareness you are talking about, then maybe yes. I am sure they have been in the industry many more years than us. They would have either learnt what they should not do or either they know what they are doing.
You are an actor who has a strong screen presence and, in the film Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy (2019), where there were so many actors, but people went crazy with your performance. How do you feel to be a part of such a good film?
I feel lucky as I got away with something because that’s the truth. For me, the best advantage of Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy was that nobody knew how my character walked, spoke. I was in my beard and doing what I do in real life. The character offered me that freedom. So, I got away with that.
There’s no question who ruled the night at the 2025 BET Awards. Kendrick Lamar walked away with five trophies, including Album of the Year for GNX and Video of the Year for Not Like Us. The ceremony, held at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, paid tribute to Black excellence in music, acting, and sports, and Kendrick made sure his voice and message were front and centre.
Kendrick Lamar accepts Best Album for GNX at the BET Awards in Los AngelesGetty Images
Lamar, Doechii, and a moment that mattered
The GNX rapper also won Best Male Hip-Hop Artist and shared the Video Director of the Year award with Dave Free. Accepting his award, Lamar reflected on his long-standing relationship with BET, saying, “They’ve always kept the culture at the core and put me in the middle of it.”
— (@)
Rising rapper Doechii also made headlines, not just for winning Best Female Hip-Hop Artist but for calling out former US President Donald Trump. In a fiery speech, she criticised the use of military force to break up protests in LA following ICE raids in Latino communities. “Every time we stand up for our rights, the military is sent in. What kind of leadership is that?” she asked the crowd.
A night of icons and throwbacks
The night wasn’t just about current stars. The BET Ultimate Icon Award honoured Mariah Carey, Snoop Dogg, Jamie Foxx, and gospel star Kirk Franklin for their decades of influence in music, entertainment, and community action. Stevie Wonder presented Foxx’s award as he opened up about his recovery from a 2023 stroke. “When I saw the ‘In Memoriam’ segment, I thought that could’ve been me,” he said.
Mariah Carey celebrates her Ultimate Icon Award with a rare live performanceGetty Images
Mariah Carey, presented her award by Busta Rhymes, lit up the stage with a brief but heartfelt speech. “If you're going to win one of these, it might as well be the Ultimate Icon,” she joked, hinting at the ups and downs of her legendary career.
With Lamar and SZA heading back on tour and voices like Doechii’s rising louder, the 2025 BET Awards proved it is a stage for change.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Harris Dickinson debuts as Rhode’s first male model in new Glazing Mist campaign
Rhode, Hailey Bieber’s rapidly growing skincare label, has chosen Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson as the face of its new product, the Glazing Mist. Known for his understated performances and growing fashion presence, Dickinson is the first male model to front a campaign for the brand. The new mist, priced at £24 (₹2,520), goes live on 24 June exclusively at rhodeskin.com.
A surprising choice that feels just right
The campaign, shot in stark black-and-white, features close-up visuals of Dickinson misting his face with the Glazing Mist, designed to refresh skin and deliver a natural glow. With ingredients like ectoin, ceramides, and magnolia extract, the formula offers both hydration and barrier support. It has also earned a stamp of approval from the National Eczema Association.
Hailey Bieber explained her choice simply: she watched Babygirl, loved Dickinson’s performance, and sensed he could bring the kind of quiet edge she wanted. “I didn’t want it to feel too ‘on-the-nose’ with the film,” she said. “It had to be chic and sporty.” The internet, however, couldn’t resist the connection to Dickinson’s now-infamous milk scene in the film, and fans were quick to point out how the dewy mist echoed that very vibe.
Rhode expands, without changing its DNA
Since its 2022 launch, Rhode has stood out for sleek, limited product drops and a focused digital presence. Its recent £790 million (₹82,950 crore) acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty has only amplified interest in where the brand goes next. While introducing a male face might suggest a shift, Bieber was clear: this isn’t about launching a men’s line but widening the brand’s appeal. “I want everyone to see themselves in Rhode,” she said.
Dickinson’s inclusion reflects a subtle repositioning. Best known for roles in Beach Rats, Triangle of Sadness, and now Babygirl, he has also been a regular in fashion, working with Dior and Loewe.
With this campaign, Rhode continues to evolve clearly, without losing the minimalist identity that made it stand out in the first place.
Keep ReadingShow less
HBO’s Harry Potter reboot slammed for casting Italian actress as Indian character Parvati Patil
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.