Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Bridget Phillipson slams Tory bid to block safeguarding bill

The proposed amendment seeks a new UK-wide statutory inquiry into grooming gangs, despite a seven-year independent review led by Professor Alexis Jay concluding in 2022.

Bridget-Phillipson-Getty

Phillipson described the bill’s as 'the single biggest piece of children safeguarding legislation in a generation.' (Photo: Getty Images)

EDUCATION SECRETARY Bridget Phillipson has criticised the Conservatives’ attempt to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, describing it as “utterly sickening.”

The proposed amendment seeks a new UK-wide statutory inquiry into grooming gangs, despite a seven-year independent review led by Professor Alexis Jay concluding in 2022.


Phillipson told the BBC the amendment would halt the bill’s progress, which she described as “the single biggest piece of children safeguarding legislation in a generation.”

The bill includes measures to improve protections for vulnerable children, such as stricter home-schooling rules, better support for children in care, and oversight of private education institutions.

Professor Jay said victims want action, not another inquiry, and the government has stated it prefers implementing her review’s recommendations. The amendment, backed by Elon Musk, is unlikely to pass due to Labour’s large majority.

Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick argued that the scale of grooming gangs is larger than previously known, citing suspicions in at least 50 towns.

Phillipson criticised him for past failures as a Home Office minister, saying he should “hang his head in shame.”

Keir Starmer also condemned the amendment, calling it a “shocking tactic” in an interview with the Daily Mirror.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

The Immigration Health Surcharge is a fee that most people applying for eligible UK visas must pay as part of their immigration application. It is intended to contribute towards the cost of healthcare during their stay in the country.

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

Highlights:

  • Migrants paying the IHS contributed at least 60% more to NHS finances than their estimated healthcare costs in 2023/24, including standard tax contributions.
  • The annual surcharge has risen from £200 to £1,035 for most visa applicants.
  • IHS revenue peaked at almost £2.5 billion in 2024/25.
  • The surcharge now accounts for more than 1 per cent of the NHS budget.
  • Revenue fell to £2.3 billion in 2025/26 as immigration numbers declined.
  • Around one-fifth of the NHS workforce comes from overseas, according to the Nuffield Trust fellow quoted in the report.

  • Migrants who pay to live and work in the UK are contributing substantially more to NHS finances than the estimated cost of the healthcare they receive, according to new analysis by the Nuffield Trust. The findings have reignited debate over immigration, healthcare funding and the purpose of the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).

    Keep ReadingShow less