Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Brexit will determine Johnson’s future as prime minister

By Sunder Katwala

Director, British Future


AS Boris Johnson, decisive victor of the Conservative leadership contest, took office on Tuesday (23) as our new prime minister, a tale of two Borises could be heard around Britain.

To his critics, he could hardly be less qualified for Downing Street. They just wish people stop calling “Boris” by his first name alone – finding this an infuriating symbol of how the usual rules do not seem to apply to him.

How can he present himself as the solution for Brexit, they ask, when his campaigning for Brexit without having a plan to deliver it was a big part of how we got here? This divisive and polarising figure, his opponents argue, is the closest we are likely to get to our own “British Trump”.

Johnson’s supporters reject this as an unfair cartoon caricature, painting a very different picture of the Conservatives leader they hope the country will now see. This Boris is an optimist, a believer in One Nation Conservatism, using his experience as London mayor to reach out. They imagine him somehow recapturing the spirit of that golden Olympic summer of 2012, not just to cheer the country up, but to get the Brexit job done too.

Sajid Javid had this Boris Johnson in mind last week, making his final major speech as Theresa May’s Home Secretary, Javid warned that politicians had to mind their own language, challenging the “naked populism” of the “send them back” language of president Donald Trump’s ugly US campaign rally.

Asked about Boris Johnson’s own loose talk on race, Javid declared his new boss was “passionately anti-racist” and somebody “very much at home with modern Britain”.

So which Boris will we get? The initial pitch is inclusive. His allies regard it as a direct day one repudiation of the “British Trump” charge that Boris Johnson should appoint the most ethnically diverse British Cabinet of all time.

In truth, previous governments had not set that bar very high, with just five non-white full Cabinet members in British political history (Paul Boateng, Baroness Amos, Baroness Warsi, Sajid Javid and Priti Patel), shared across the previous four prime ministers.

Still, it is not just a symbolic statement that there will be no putting the clock back to the pre-EEC Britain of 1972 when Britain leaves the EU. It is also a deliberate statement that the Conservatives are proud that ethnic diversity is now a cross-party affair – and that they intend to take the fight to Labour and compete to represent the aspirations and hopes of Britain’s black and Asian voters.

Will there be substance beyond the mood music too? That may not be a job for the leader. Boris Johnson – our first journalist as prime minister – will think in headlines. That can often be a recipe for political tactics crowding out strategy.

Communication matters in politics too: Theresa May’s inability to persuade either parliament or public of the merits of her Brexit deal was central to the failure of her government. The new prime minister’s short-attention-span will challenge Johnson’s Downing Street operation – but he may be less likely to bring the machinery of government to a halt as prime ministers who have sought to exert as much grip on policy from Downing Street as they did in the Treasury or Home Office. Senior Cabinet colleagues with a vision for what they want to achieve may find themselves trusted with more autonomy than under previous prime ministers. The desire is to be a British Reagan, rather than a British Trump.

On immigration, Johnson’s instincts are much more liberal than Theresa May’s – often declaring himself a “pro-immigration” politician. Expect liberal moves on student and skilled migration – and ditching of the failed net migration target. Johnson has also recently revived his long-standing support for an earned ‘amnesty’ for those in Britain long-term without legal status. It would be a bold, controversial move – though a government introducing a new post-Brexit system may have the confidence and permission to address historic backlogs and put people on the right side of the law.

A proper integration strategy will require more long-term focus – though making support for the English language a priority in the spending review would be an important first step. Keeping the pledge to investigate anti-Muslim prejudice in the Conservative party will be one early test of the One Nation rhetoric.

New ministers setting out their long-term plans for post-Brexit Britain may bring an air of unreality to the politics of this August and September – with just 100 days to the October 31st Brexit deadline, and opinion as divided as ever.

Should he conjure up a workable solution on Brexit, Boris Johnson may have the chance to prove he is a modern One Nation Conservative. But fail to resolve the Brexit conundrum – and his government could be all over before Christmas. And we may never get to find out which was the real Boris Johnson after all.

More For You

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

Higher education participation is 50 per cent for British south Asian students

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

THE headline in the Daily Telegraph read: An 18-year-old with a higher IQ than Stephen Hawking has passed 23 A-levels.

The gushing piece went on to report that Mahnoor Cheema, whose family originate from Pakistan, had also received an unconditional offer from Oxford University to read medicine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less
“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less