MUSIC legend Apache Indian used his warrior-like spirit to break down barriers and shatter glass ceilings in the music industry, but today he is fighting battles of a different kind.
He is on the front line speaking out against injustice and carving out a path for new talent
with his music academy. His superb last single Punjabi Girl showed that the singing sensation still has an ability to deliver world-class hits, but his track also did not get the support it deserved from the publicly funded BBC Asian Network last year.
When Eastern Eye caught up with Apache Indian, he spoke his mind about the music industry, his amazing career, the battle with the BBC, being fearless and his concerns over
a lack of new talent.
Have you ever looked back on your musical journey?
I look back at my musical journey daily in some way and can only give thanks to god for the guidance, strength and blessings throughout my career. I am thankful for both the good and bad times, all of which have contributed to making me who I am today, both personally and professionally.
Would you consider writing a book about your amazing journey?
I am currently writing a book and also in discussions with a few key people about an Apache Indian movie. I want people to see the struggle and reality of my career, as opposed to just what they see on television or what they think they know, because that’s not the real business of music.
What keeps the musical fire inside you burning so brightly?
The musical fire within me will burn as long as I am alive and beyond, as I share my life, views, emotions, soul, spirit, dreams and my prayers all through my music and what I stand for every day.
What is your opinion on the British Asian music scene today?
The scene has lacked an infrastructure for many years. There’s no legitimate platform for British Asian artists. Award shows have come and gone, there’s little or no unity among artists, the people in the industry have become selfish and care only about their personal gain. Nobody seems to be interested in educating or genuinely supporting new artists or making suggestions of how the industry can move forward and grow.
Tell us more…
All I see is the same old Asian mentality of jealousy, power struggle, deceit and favouritism. That’s never going to result in new talent in the industry and, eventually, the charts. It’s our duty to help find and develop Asian talent who can be good enough to shine among the biggest artists in the world because that’s what our scene lacks now. This can only happen with the right guidance, education, integrity and experience. This is what the British Asian music scene needs now or it’s as good as finished.
Does it sadden you that the scene has gone backwards despite pioneers like you smashing down boundaries and shattering glass ceilings?
It’s extremely disappointing and disheartening knowing that I’ve contributed for the past 27 years and continue to do my part, but I can’t do it on my own. We need to come together to create a legitimate scene and put some Asian talent on world stages, because we deserve to be there. If I can do it, others can too. I want there to be more artists who break barriers and gain the respect of the industry beyond just Asians. I’m waiting for the day when artists are bigger than their songs, as opposed to the song being bigger than them.
Why do you think the same level of talent is no longer emerging today?
The talent is out there but no real support for them exists. Labels don’t invest, any idiot can call themselves a manager, and random people are misguiding young people. The internet has been both a blessing and a curse because it gives a platform for the non-talent to be exposed too and they gain popularity through dishonest means with fake followers and likes.
What key changes would you like to see?
I would like to see new blood involved with the scene that is not caught up with organisational politics. I want to see honesty, integrity, drive and commitment replace all the nonsense and ego.
Your last release Punjabi Girl was one of the best songs of 2018, but it didn’t get the support it deserved from the BBC Asian network. How did you feel about that?
I was shocked, because the song featuring Raftaar got early support from Panjabi Hit Squad, Nihal and Bobby Friction on their shows on the network. I wrote it mainly in Punjabi, it features Hindi vocals from Raftaar and links new generations with old. It connects languages, countries, culture and old styles with the new. The song was produced
by British Asian, Charlie Hype with vocal production by the Grammy Award-winning Jim
Beanz in the USA. We personally invested in a big budget video in Mumbai with no label involved.
So you ticked all the boxes and more…
The song had all the elements the Asian Network looks for and has supported early, so I didn’t get it. I spoke to someone who supposedly heads the playlists because I thought maybe I am missing something here, but he had no logical explanation and bluntly told me it would never be playlisted.
That is strange, considering the great single was supported by leading radio, TV and media across the globe…
I am British Asian and the song was better than most of the stuff on their playlist, so I deserved respect and support, but had nothing but rudeness, disrespect and no reason was given.
What are the criteria to get a song playlisted on the network and what qualifications do they have?
Some of them were running around their school playgrounds while I was in the top 10 globally.
Why do you think a great single like that wouldn’t get playlisted?
Politics and egos. They have become very rude and arrogant. They have no real care or understanding of the current music scene. There have been various allegations over the years including serious ones, which should be investigated, in my opinion.
What message do you want to give to the BBC?
No message, but more observations. The network plays no part in the Asian music industry
today. They are not relevant or respected. Do people know that their established DJs have
no say in the playlist? So who makes the decisions? When someone high up in a station
says to me ‘I can make or break you’ in front of six others and degrades me in public, then what does he say to less established artists? The network has had so much controversy surrounding them over the years. I feel they don’t have any form of credible charts/playlists and have lost public confidence. They play more Bollywood than British
music and live in a complete bubble. This is a massive waste of taxpayers’ money that could be spent better. Regional Asian radio stations do a much better job, are more listened to and are in touch with local communities and genuinely support artists.
The radio station didn’t support your song and then invited you to do a ‘no filter’ interview with Bobby Friction, which you accepted. But, then, the network cancelled it; how did that feel?
It was like rubbing salt in one’s wounds. I posted on Instagram saying that I’m doing the show and mentioned their lack of support for my single, so they cancelled my interview. Why call me at all? What did they think I was going to talk about? Why is the Birmingham Asian Network team so disconnected from the London team? Why didn’t the DJs stand up against his decision? People thanked me for speaking out against the network, but they still work at the station. You are all wasting your time as you no longer have any say or control. You don’t have a job without us providing you with music, but some of you seem to have become bigger than music itself.
Do you think authorities and people in the music industry are afraid of real talk?
People seem to have a lot to say off camera but just can’t seem to find the words when it matters.
What other problems do you think exist in the music industry?
I have mixed views on the use of the internet by artists and hate that no one pays for music anymore. Today we see many so-called ‘artists’ who seem to have lot of followers, but have no talent.
What advice would you give emerging artists?
Artists need to better their talent, try to keep up with the ever-changing industry and surround themselves with people who can teach and support them, and guide their careers. It’s important to perform as much as you can. It’s vital to build a real fan base, not just online followers. Lastly, I would like to remind emerging artists that they too are responsible for contributing to the scene.
You have always been fearless, where does that fighting spirit come from?
When you are passionate about something and know you have god on your side, you become fearless. I have always stood up for things that are just not right, either in the music industry or just generally in life, and now after 27 years in the industry, I have nothing to lose and no fear whatsoever to say what is on my mind. Whether someone wants to listen is up to them, but now it’s my time to speak up, because I’ve earned it.
What can we expect from you in 2019?
I plan to release more music and will continue to tour globally. I recently signed UK rapper Yatez and a production/DJ duo called Argenil from Bangalore, India, to my management company Sunset Entertainment Group in the USA, so I’m looking for new, deserving talent.
What are your future hopes for UK Asian music and artists?
I would like to see Asian music awards on national television and become as big as the MOBOs, which is something the network should have done by now. I believe the BBC Asian Network should be shut down completely and investigated. I hope more artists speak up for the sake of music and future of the scene.
And finally, what inspires you today?
Five years ago I set up the Apache Indian Music Academy at Handsworth Campus, South & City College. I use my name and experience to help young people in my community with music and life skills. That’s what inspires me today and gives me a sense of fulfilment. Keep in touch with the movement for real change @apacheindianhq and @aimusicacademy.
*The BBC denied the allegations and said: "Each track is considered for the playlist based on its musical merit and whether it is relevant for our young target audience, with decisions made on a case-by-case basis.
"Asian Network has a proven commitment to supporting new British-Asian talent."
THE Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured confiscation orders totalling £305,284 from Raheel Mirza, Cameron Vickers and Opeyemi Solaja for their roles in an investment fraud. The orders cover all their remaining assets.
The confiscation proceedings against a fourth defendant, Reuben Akpojaro, have been adjourned.
The FCA said the money will be returned to investors as soon as possible. Failure to pay could lead to imprisonment.
Between June 2016 and January 2020, the defendants cold-called individuals and persuaded them to invest in a shell company.
They claimed to trade client money in binary options, but the funds were used to fund their lifestyles.
In 2023, the four were convicted and sentenced to a combined 24 and a half years.
Steve Smart, executive director, Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said: “We are committed to fighting financial crime, including denying criminals their ill-gotten gains. We’ve already successfully prosecuted these individuals for their part in a scam that conned 120 people out of their money. We’re now seeking to recover as much as we can for victims.”
The man who started it all, Dadasaheb Phalke, the pioneer of Indian cinema, is set to be immortalised on screen not once, but twice. In a surprising turn, two major biopics on the "Father of Indian Cinema" are in the works, with Bollywood and Tollywood’s biggest stars stepping into his shoes.
First, reports emerged that Jr NTR will portray Phalke in Made in India, a project backed by RRR director SS Rajamouli. The film, announced last year, will be a pan-India release diving into the birth of Indian cinema. Sources say NTR was instantly drawn to the script, fascinated by lesser-known aspects of Phalke’s journey. The actor, always known for his high-action roles, will take on a more subdued, dramatic part this time.
— (@)
But before fans could fully process this news, another bombshell dropped! Aamir Khan and Rajkumar Hirani are teaming up for their own take on Phalke’s life. The duo, known for blockbusters like 3 Idiots and PK, has been working on the script for four years, with Phalke’s grandson contributing personal anecdotes. Set against India’s independence movement, the film will highlight Phalke’s struggles and triumphs in creating an industry that now dominates global screens.
— (@)
The clash of these two projects has sparked debates: Who will do justice to Phalke’s legacy? While Rajamouli’s vision leans toward grandeur, Hirani’s touch is expected to bring together emotion with humour. Meanwhile, fans are already picking sides: will NTR’s intensity or Aamir’s nuanced acting win over audiences?
— (@)
As the two teams prepare to bring this legendary filmmaker’s story to audiences, viewers can look forward to two distinct cinematic portraits of the man who laid the foundation of Indian cinema, each promising a unique perspective on the icon who changed the course of Indian storytelling forever.
Keep ReadingShow less
Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said at a Downing Street press conference that the changes were necessary as male prisons in England and Wales are expected to run out of space by November.
THOUSANDS of criminals, including domestic abusers and sexual offenders recalled to prison for breaching licence conditions, will be released after 28 days under new emergency measures to manage the prison capacity crisis.
Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said at a Downing Street press conference that the changes were necessary as male prisons in England and Wales are expected to run out of space by November. “That would lead to a total breakdown of law and order,” she said.
The policy applies to offenders originally sentenced to between one and four years. Terrorists and those assessed by the police, prison and probation services as high risk or those who have committed serious further offences will be excluded, The Times reported.
Mahmood said the change “buys us the time we need to introduce the sentencing that — alongside our record prison building plans — will end the crisis in our prisons for good.”
According to The Times, the number of prison spaces has dropped below 500, with jails operating at 99 per cent capacity. The Ministry of Justice said those being recalled for minor infractions, such as missing appointments or failing to notify changes in circumstances, are clogging up the system. Currently, 13,583 people — 15 per cent of the prison population — are in jail after recall, up from 100 in 1993.
Victims commissioner Baroness Newlove told The Times: “Victims will understandably feel unnerved and bewildered… reducing time served on recall can only place victims and the wider public at an unnecessary risk of harm.”
Domestic abuse commissioner Dame Nicole Jacobs said: “You are not sent to prison for four years if you do not pose significant danger… Re-releasing them back into the community after 28 days is simply unacceptable.”
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said Labour was “siding with criminals over the public” and should instead focus on the 17,000 people on remand and deporting the 10,350 foreign criminals in UK prisons.
Amy Rees, interim permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice, said failure to enact the measures would be “intolerable” and could force courts to release dangerous offenders on bail due to lack of space.
The policy is expected to create 1,400 places and remain in place until the government’s wider sentencing reforms begin next spring. Construction on three new prisons will begin this year, adding 5,000 places, but the government still faces a projected shortfall of 9,500 by 2028.
Keep ReadingShow less
Iconic moments that transformed Eurovision, from ABBA’s dazzling debut to Måneskin’s raw rock rebellion, these performances changed the game forever
The Eurovision Song Contest has never been just about glitter, high notes, and questionable fashion choices. It’s where music collides with the messiness of global politics. Some acts stroll onstage, sing politely, and vanish. Others? They rip the roof off, rewrite the rules, and leave scorch marks on history.
From ABBA’s glitter-drenched revolution to Måneskin’s rock ‘n’ roll swagger, these iconic acts reshaped the contest, searing themselves into the collective memory of millions. Let’s dive into five performances that tore the rulebook to shreds and left the world stunned.
1. ABBA – Waterloo (Sweden, 1974)
The explosion that turned Eurovision into a supernova. ABBA didn’t just win. They hijacked the whole show with sequins, swagger, and a chorus that’s been stuck in humanity’s brain for 50 years. The song was so unstoppable that even Napoleon would’ve surrendered to it. This was a total pop coup. Why it’s legendary? Because Eurovision’s biggest success story began here! ABBA set the bar for every act that followed.
Monsters. Fire. Riffs that could crack concrete. Who would’ve thought that a metal band dressed like monsters would rock the Eurovision stage? When Finland’s nightmare-fuelled rock brigade stormed the stage, half the audience clutched their pearls and the other half lost their minds. Eurovision had never smelt like gasoline and face paint before. It was the first time Eurovision truly embraced heavy metal, and Europe loved it. It was an anthem of rebellion, forcing Eurovision to evolve and Finland’s first win was well earned.
3. Conchita Wurst – Rise Like a Phoenix (Austria, 2014)
Conchita Wurst didn’t just sing, in fact, she soared. In a flowing gown with a beard that dared the world to question its norms, Conchita’s ballad became an anthem for resilience. When the final note faded, it was clear: Conchita had shattered stereotypes, and Eurovision was more inclusive because of it. Eurovision became more than a show that night; it became a revolution.
Leather, sweat, and a smirk that could melt steel. Rock hadn’t felt this raw at Eurovision in years. Måneskin swaggered onto the stage with an unfiltered, unapologetic energy that made everyone sit up and take notice. Gritty, powerful, and defiantly cool, this performance not only won the contest, but also marked a new era, where Eurovision wasn’t just a pop paradise but a space for rock to thrive.
Måneskin - Zitti E Buoni - Italy 🇮🇹 - Grand Final - Eurovision 2021youtu.be
5. Loreen – Euphoria (Sweden, 2012)
Twelve minutes of wind machines and raw euphoria (pun intended). Merging barefoot from the shadows, she captivated audiences with her ethereal vocals and minimalist choreography, all set against a backdrop of strobe lights and falling snow. By the time she finished, Europe was collectively breathless, earning her a landslide victory with 372 points: the second-highest in contest history at the time.
Eurovision isn’t just another song contest. It was a referendum. On war. On freedom. On who gets to be heard. Some acts left with trophies, others left with scars. But every single one proved that when the world’s a dumpster fire, music doesn’t just soundtrack the chaos… it answers it.
Keep ReadingShow less
They traced its likely path through a prominent landowning family
A document long believed to be a mere copy of Magna Carta has been identified as a rare original dating back to 1300, making it one of the most valuable historical manuscripts in existence, according to British academics.
The discovery was made after researchers in the UK examined digitised images of the document, which has been held in Harvard Law School’s library since 1946. At the time, the manuscript was purchased for just $27.50 – approximately £7 at the then exchange rate – and described as a damp-stained 14th-century copy. Today, that sum would be roughly $450 (£339) adjusted for inflation.
However, medieval history professors David Carpenter of King's College London and Nicholas Vincent of the University of East Anglia now believe the manuscript is an original Magna Carta from the year 1300, issued during the reign of King Edward I.
“This is a fantastic discovery,” said Professor Carpenter, who first began analysing the document after encountering its digitised version on Harvard’s website. “It is the last Magna Carta... It deserves celebration, not as some mere copy, stained and faded, but as an original of one of the most significant documents in world constitutional history – a cornerstone of freedoms past, present and yet to be won.”
Professor Carpenter said he was “absolutely astonished” by the finding and by the fact that the manuscript’s true nature had gone unrecognised for decades. “That it was sold for peanuts and forgotten is incredible,” he added.
Magna Carta, first issued by King John in 1215, is widely regarded as a foundational document in the history of constitutional law. It established the principle that everyone, including the monarch, was subject to the law, and it granted basic liberties and protections to the king’s subjects. The charter has had a lasting influence, shaping constitutional frameworks in countries around the world.
The academics hope that the newly authenticated Magna Carta will be made available for public viewingHarvard
Following the 1215 version, the charter was reissued multiple times by successive monarchs, culminating in the 1300 edition issued under King Edward I. During this period, it is believed that around 200 original copies were produced and distributed across England. Only 25 of these originals are known to survive today, from the various editions between 1215 and 1300. Most are in the UK, with two in the US National Archives in Washington DC and one in Parliament House, Canberra.
“It is an icon both of the Western political tradition and of constitutional law,” said Professor Vincent. “If you asked anybody what the most famous single document in the history of the world is, they would probably name Magna Carta.”
The professors now believe the document discovered at Harvard originated in the town of Appleby, Cumbria. They traced its likely path through a prominent landowning family, the Lowthers, who are thought to have passed the manuscript to Thomas Clarkson, a leading anti-slavery campaigner in the 1780s. From there, the document entered the Maynard family estate.
In late 1945, Air Vice-Marshal Forster Maynard sold it at auction through Sotheby’s, where it was purchased by a London bookseller for £42. Harvard Law School acquired it months later for a fraction of that price, and it was catalogued as HLS MS 172 – a “copy made in 1327”.
The manuscript will become one of the most significant items in Harvard’s collectionHarvard
To determine the manuscript’s authenticity, Professors Carpenter and Vincent spent over a year analysing the text and comparing it to the six other known originals from the 1300 issue. Due to its faded condition, they did not work directly from the original but instead examined images taken using ultraviolet and spectral imaging techniques.
They found that the handwriting, dimensions and phrasing of the manuscript all matched the characteristics of the confirmed 1300 versions. The exact wording was critical to establishing its authenticity, as the text of Magna Carta was slightly altered with each reissue. The Harvard manuscript passed these tests “with flying colours”.
The value of the document could be extremely high. In 2007, a 1297 version of Magna Carta sold at auction in New York for $21 million – around £10.5 million at the time. While Professor Vincent declined to estimate the exact value of the Harvard version, he acknowledged it could be worth a similar figure.
Amanda Watson, assistant dean for library services at Harvard Law School, praised the discovery and the work of the academics involved. “This exemplifies what happens when collections are opened to brilliant scholars,” she said. “Behind every scholarly revelation stands the essential work of librarians, who not only collect and preserve materials, but create pathways that otherwise would remain hidden.”
The academics hope that the newly authenticated Magna Carta will be made available for public viewing, allowing more people to appreciate its historical significance.
“This document speaks to the very roots of legal liberty,” said Professor Carpenter. “It is more than just a piece of parchment – it’s a living symbol of the rights we enjoy and continue to fight for today.”
If confirmed by additional verification and widely recognised as an original, the manuscript will become one of the most significant items in Harvard’s collection and a key artefact in the history of global democracy.