THE string of disastrous Bollywood films headlined by Akshay Kumar and Ajay Devgn in recent years has become a running joke.
With Hindi cinema going through arguably its worst phase in history, the two ageing actors prioritising quantity over quality has only added to the industry’s troubles. Both have continued their woeful run of failures by starting 2025 with flops Azaad and Sky Force.
Both had come together for the megabudget entertainer Singham Again last year, but it massively underperformed and was ultimately seen as a flop due to its enormous budget. Since 2020, 55-year-old Devgn has headlined 11 films as a lead actor, with only three managing to succeed. His long list of flops includes Bhuj: The Pride of India, Runway 34, Thank God, Bholaa, Maidaan, and Auron Mein Kahan Dum Tha. Making matters worse, Devgn has directed and produced many of these failed projects.
If Devgn’s career has been struggling, then for 57-year-old Akshay Kumar, it has been nothing short of a nightmare. Since 2020, he has headlined 16 films, with only two being counted as successes. His flops include Laxmii, Bachchhan Paandey, Samrat Prithviraj, Raksha Bandhan, Ram Setu, Selfiee, Sarfira, and last year’s biggest disappointment, Bade Miyan Chote Miyan.
While other frontline stars have had their fair share of flops in the past five years, none come close to the sheer number of failures delivered by these two actors. Despite this, they continue to flood the industry with upcoming projects, many of which already appear to be disasters in the making. They are even reportedly teaming up for a film directed by Devgn and starring Kumar – an odd choice considering every film Devgn has directed has been a commercial failure.
Devgn is hoping to reverse his fortunes with sequels to his previous hits, including Raid 2, De De Pyaar De 2, and Son of Sardaar 2. Kumar, too, is relying on sequels, with new instalments of Jolly LLB, Housefull, Welcome, and Hera Pheri in the pipeline. However, their increasing dependence on past successes only highlights their failure to find fresh, engaging projects.
While their disconnect from audience preferences is undoubtedly harming Bollywood, it is hard to blame them for cashing in. If financiers, corporate houses, and top producers are willing to burn money on actors with such a poor track record, it would be foolish for them not to take the money. Additionally, with what is arguably the weakest generation of young leading men in Bollywood history, producers have little choice but to stick with ageing stars, even if they keep delivering flops.
Both actors still have the potential to choose projects that align with audience expectations. But with lucrative endorsement deals, hefty paychecks, and an endless wave of films, they seem blind to what makes a good movie. This means that audiences will continue to endure one disappointment after another from these two actors. But the bigger question remains – how much longer can Hindi cinema afford to haemorrhage money on stars who have already had their time at the top?
THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.
One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.
Britain once became rich through ruling India. History could repeat itself, though now the partnership is of equals.
The UK economy could be rescued, indeed transformed, though a closer engagement with India made possible by the Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
The FTA is probably Starmer’s biggest foreign policy success, which might be one reason why his enemies want to play it down. The Times did carry a story, “British Airways to expand its flights to India”, and quoted the airline’s CEO Sean Doyle, who was part of the Starmer delegation to India.
He said: “India is not just another market. It is one of the fastest-growing major economies, the world’s most populous democracy, and a tech and innovation hub that is reshaping global business. Forging stronger links with India is not only logical – it’s essential. British Airways has been flying to India for 100 years, making us one of the longest-serving international carriers in the country.”
The Times made only a passing reference to what Starmer found on landing in India: “During his visit to Mumbai this week, the prime minister received the kind of reception politicians in Britain can only dream of. As his convoy made its way into the city centre, it passed more than 5,700 posters bearing his face. At one point, Sir Keir Starmer even found himself joining in with a traditional Indian dance to celebrate Diwali.”
The Financial Times covered the visit,but wrote at length about visas.
To be sure, papers publish stories they think will boost sales. But they need to cover stories other than boats, Farage and Meghan. The India story is much more exciting and has the potential to make life better for everyone.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.