Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

A year like no other

By Amit Roy

MY LATE mother used to tell us five brothers and sisters: “Nothing much happened today, it was very quiet, but years from now you will look back and realise these were the happy days.”


How we all yearn for a return to some sort of normality.

It seems a long time since March 17 when the government’s chief sci­entific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, told MPs in a Westminster commit­tee room that if the final death toll from Covid-19 could be kept below 20,000, it would be “a good outcome”.

Eleven days later, he was backed by Professor Stephen Powis, NHS England’s medical director, at a Downing Street briefing: “If we can keep deaths below 20,000, we will have done very well.”

Earlier this week, the number of people who had died in hospitals and care homes 28 days after test­ing positive stood at 65,520, with 1.91 million infected. The total number of “excess” deaths, com­pared with expected levels, has now crossed 70,839.

To put things into perspective, that is 1,362 times the 52 people killed during the suicide bombings in London in 2005. It is remarkable how quickly some politicians have got used to hearing that, say, 600 people have died in a day – and press for pubs to be kept open.

Perhaps years from now, chil­dren will ask: “Granddad, what did you do during the pandemic?”

Eastern Eye was perhaps the first newspaper to point out that the death toll among black and Asian people was disproportionately high. In the early weeks of the pan­demic, there was almost a daily roll call of Asians who laid down their lives in the service of the NHS.

We all learnt the meaning of words such as “self-isolate” – and PPE. After Abdul Mabud Chowd­hury, a Bangladeshi consultant, died, it came out he had directed a Facebook message to the prime minister, Boris Johnson, appealing for an adequate supply of protec­tive gear. Poornima Nair, a GP in Bishop Auckland, County Durham, was the first female doctor to suc­cumb to Covid-19.

To be sure, some of those who died had underlying health issues, such as diabetes or heart problems. But in relation to the black commu­nity in particular, what Covid did was to shine a light on the previ­ously hidden recesses of structural racism. The toll was especially high among those whose work exposed them to members of the public. Without making too exaggerated a claim, researchers in the future may find that Eastern Eye has provided “the first draft of history”.

Hundreds, more likely, thou­sands of books will be written about the year of the pandemic, with each country try­ing to come to terms with a year like no other. There are many puzzles yet to be solved. How come Britain, with a well-established na­tional health service, has had one of the highest tolls in Europe? Can what happened in the US all be blamed on president Don­ald Trump?

If the pandemic was not traumatic enough – 1.67 million dead and 75.4 million infect­ed globally as of last Friday (18) – the story was complicated by the death in May of a black man, George Floyd, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, by a white police officer who pressed his knee on the victim’s neck for “eight minutes and 46 seconds”.

As the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest gathered momentum and spilled over into Britain, the statue of slave trader Edward Colston was pulled down in Bristol and dumped in a nearly harbour. Even Sir Win­ston Churchill was not spared, as his statue in London’s Parliament Square was daubed “racist” over allegations he had aggravated the effects of the Bengal Famine of 1943 in which between two and four million people had perished. Protesters drew up a hit list of more than 70 statues they wanted either demol­ished or removed.

The heads of many schools have an­nounced that the history syllabus is to be “decol­onised” so chil­dren are given greater under­standing of how Britain took a leading role in the abolition of the slave trade in which it had previously been an enthusiastic participant. The con­tribution of Indian soldiers in two world wars and the Partition of In­dia are also likely to be included.

The National Trust was working on the colonial links of about 100 of its properties, but – in response to BLM – brought forward its 115-page report, Addressing our histories of colonialism and historic slavery.

Entirely predictably, this has brought a furious backlash from those who feel that British colonial­ism was, on the whole, a force for good and that the “woke” – a fa­vourite word – are out to denigrate the country’s “culture”.

Covid has had some unexpected consequences of which a more bal­anced look at the country’s colonial past, both good and bad, might be one. Whether the two sides can be reconciled in a study of Britain’s “shared history” with its former colonies remains to be seen.

For Asians the main aim must now be to survive the pandemic. It would be tragic to fall prey to the virus when a vaccine is around the corner. Boris had warned in early March that many more families in Britain will “lose loved ones before their time”. What the prime minister didn’t realise as he was himself rushed into intensive care within days was that it “could have gone either way” for him too.

More For You

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Mahmood's plans are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022

Getty Images

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Shabana Mahmood is already the third British Asian woman to be a home secretary talking tough on asylum. That shows how much ethnic diversity in high office has accelerated. No Asian woman had ever been an MP before Mahmood and Priti Patel were elected in May 2010. But that Mahmood is so closely following Patel’s agenda now casts doubt on how far the Labour government’s new asylum proposals can deliver control in the Channel or rebuild public confidence in the system.

Mahmood’s core mission is to grip the asylum issue: she declares her reforms to be the most significant since the 1950s. Yet, they are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022 – which also proposed asylum seekers getting only 30 months of temporary protection. Suella Braverman then went even further – pledging that no asylum claims would get heard at all. By memory-holing these efforts, Mahmood misses crucial lessons of why they failed. If “pull factors” of the UK asylum design were the key to small boat arrivals, Patel and Braverman would have stopped the boats before the election.

Keep ReadingShow less