Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

You know something, Jon Snow

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

MANY years ago, the Channel 4 newscaster Jon Snow was a visiting professor of journalism at Nottingham Trent University, where I happened to lecture.


Over the years, I learned from him, and so did my students. When asked by a national newspaper what he would like for his epitaph, Jon cleverly showed how in touch he was with popular culture. He wanted the words: “You know nothing, Jon Snow” on his tombstone, in reference to that brilliant drama The Game of Thrones. Simple. Genius. Typical Jon Snow. To this day, under his stewardship, Channel 4 News remains the programme to watch for any serious journalist.

But Jon has run into trouble after 2,600-odd people complained to the Office of Communications (Ofcom) about an impromptu ad-lib on one of his programmes at the end of March. His crime? During one of the pro-Brexit protests in parliament, the veteran newsman said he had “never seen so many white people in one place”.

As a former member of Ofcom’s advisory committee for England for five years, I get visibly riled up when I hear mention of a person’s skin colour if  it is not germane to the story, as those with whom I served will tell you. With all due respect to my former colleagues, Jon did nothing wrong. He was saying it as he saw it. And, what’s more, he was doing us a public service. He was pointing out something which needed further examination – why were there so few people of colour at this rally?

If you think Brexit has nothing to do with race, then I humbly suggest you are wrong. Brexit has everything to do with race. It goes to the heart of how we see and define ourselves. It is central to our identity. And what is more, Asians have skin in the game. Only, they have not been asked for their views because the media, except for this newspaper, has not asked the question – why would Asians, many of whom are descended from immigrants, vote in favour of Brexit?

It is not because Asians aren’t interested in Brexit. The biggest issue of our time affects business. And remember that according to the 2019 report by Grant Thornton, a global independent firm of tax auditors, 842 Indian companies operate in the UK today, with combined revenues of almost £48 billion. They paid a total of over £684 million in corporation tax, significantly higher than global brands Google, Amazon and Starbucks. So why haven’t we made more of how Asians view Brexit. Yes, we can be notoriously media shy. Yes, we go to great lengths to make sure little gets in the way of making a profit. But we can be coaxed into commenting.

And if we were to ask that question, we would find that unlike four decades ago, things have changed. Asians no longer vote en bloc for Labour. And they are no longer all pro-immigration. In fact, the speed of assimilated thought and attitude in just three gen

erations has been staggering. Asians feel so much a part of Britain that, like many indigenous Britons, they don’t want their country, yes, their country, to be overrun by foreigners. That’s what I found when I asked the question of some Asians around the UK for a chapter in a book on Brexit.

But I guess this is evolution, isn’t it? The same families who sought refuge in Britain after being thrown out by African dictators, those who came here for a better economic life, and those who fought to get their child’s spouse to the UK after an arranged marriage, are now saying they don’t want others to have the same chance. But they appear to be doing so in the typical Asian way, quietly and without fanfare, agitating behind the scenes. Yet it was not always so. We itched to have our voices heard. In the 1970s, we lobbied for race relations laws. In the 1980s, we marched against racists. In the 1990s, we fought for religious discrimination legislation. And in the first decade of this millennium, we successfully ensured a law against forced marriage. We campaigned in the full glare of the media spotlight.

Yet, seemingly, we dare not admit we have changed so much that we are shutting the door to those who only wish to emulate what we have done so successfully by changing country.

Brexit has split communities. It has split families. It has split racial groups but, unusually this time, not along the fault lines of race. And that is why Jon was right to point out what he did that March evening. Sometimes we need to point out the obvious, to get others to think and question assumptions.

  • Barnie Choudhury is a former BBC journalist and a professor of professional practice in communications at the University of Buckingham.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less