MORE THAN 300 people of Indian heritage, who grew up in Walsall and surrounding areas, attended a reunion held in the US earlier this month.
The event marked the journeys of UK-born or raised individuals with Indian roots now living across the US, organisers said.
Dhansukh Patel, former chair of Asian American Hotel Owners’ Association, arranged the Walsall Group USA Reunion 2025, held from May 8-11, at the Quality Inn in Atlanta, Georgia.
According to a statement, people travelled from across the United States to reconnect with childhood friends, neighbours and classmates they had not seen for decades. Many shared memories of growing up in terraced houses, walking to school through snow, and attending community gatherings in their former neighbourhoods.
“We left Walsall years ago, but this weekend reminded us of our humble roots, and we know we are who we are because of those roots,” said one participant.
Senior citizens in their eighties shared heartfelt stories of their immigration experiences and the sacrifices they made for future generations.
Participants spoke of their parents’ experiences settling in Britain and the bonds formed in Indian communities throughout the Black Country region.
Evening entertainment featured karaoke nights, where participants performed Bollywood songs and ABBA hits. A 1970s and 1980s band provided music on one evening, while a live Indian band performed during the gala night.
The programme also included a health and wellness session addressing sleep management.
Organisers said there are plans for similar events in future, as attendees expressed their desire to maintain the connections renewed during the weekend.
US President Donald Trump’s administration has announced it will “aggressively” revoke the visas of Chinese students studying in the United States.
"Those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields" will also be included in the revocation process, stated Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Tensions between Beijing and Washington had already deteriorated following the trade war sparked by Trump’s tariffs.
Estimates suggest that approximately 280,000 Chinese students were studying in the US last year. It remains unclear how many of them will be affected by this move.
China has strongly opposed the action and urged the US to pursue more constructive international relations.
Rubio also indicated that the increased scrutiny would apply to future visa applicants from China and Hong Kong. He has instructed US embassies worldwide to halt student visa appointments as the State Department plans to expand social media vetting for these applicants.
Although Chinese nationals previously formed the majority of international students at American universities, that trend is now shifting.
Data from the US State Department shows a decline in the number of Chinese students enrolling in American universities, largely due to deteriorating US-China relations during the pandemic era.
Currently, a significant number of foreign students are being deported, while others have had their visas revoked by the administration. Many of these actions are being challenged in court.
The US government has also frozen hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for universities. President Trump has criticised prestigious institutions such as Harvard for being overly liberal and for what he perceives as a failure to address antisemitism on campus.
Although Beijing has condemned the US in general terms, it has not issued a specific response to this visa crackdown.
Foreign students are vital to the financial health of many US universities, as they typically pay higher tuition fees.
According to the US Department of Commerce, Indian and Chinese students accounted for 54% of the international student population and contributed up to $50 billion to the US economy in 2023.
Some students have expressed regret over choosing US universities for their education.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Two men were sentenced in the US for a human smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals near the Canada-US border in 2022. (Representational image:iStock)
TWO human traffickers were sentenced on Wednesday for their roles in a smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals in 2022, the US Department of Justice said.
Harshkumar Ramanlal Patel, 29, was sentenced to over 10 years in prison for organising the logistics of the operation, while co-conspirator Steve Anthony Shand, 50, was sentenced to over six years for picking up migrants in the United States.
A jury found the pair guilty of their roles in what officials described as a "large-scale human smuggling operation that brought Indian nationals to Canada on fraudulent student visas and then smuggled them into the United States," according to the DOJ.
In January 2022, Patel and Shand tried to smuggle 11 Indian nationals from Canada into the United States on foot in severe weather conditions. The DOJ said the recorded wind chill was -37.8 degrees Celsius (-36 degrees Fahrenheit).
A US Border Patrol agent found Shand’s van stuck in the snow in Minnesota, where Shand claimed there were no other people stranded.
But five more people came out of the fields, and one of them was airlifted to a hospital for lifesaving care.
Shand was arrested with two migrants, while the family of four was found later by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Their frozen bodies were discovered in an isolated area in Canada.
"The boy was wrapped in a blanket with his father's frozen glove covering his face," the DOJ said.
"Every time I think about this case I think about this family -- including two beautiful little children -- who the defendants left to freeze to death in a blizzard," said Acting US Attorney Lisa D Kirkpatrick.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
The exit was soon after his criticism about the legislative centrepiece of Trump’s agenda
Billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has announced his departure from Donald Trump’s administration after completing a turbulent efficiency drive, during which he served as a special government employee.
The initiative aimed to cut thousands of federal jobs and reduce the size of the US government.
Musk thanked US President Donald Trump for the opportunity to contribute to the Department of Government Efficiency—also known as DOGE—via social media platform X.
“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk wrote on X. He added that the DOGE mission “will continue and eventually become a way of life with this government.”
His offboarding process from the White House began on Wednesday night.
Although Musk’s role was always intended to be temporary, his departure came shortly after he criticised a key part of Trump’s legislative agenda.
Musk expressed disappointment with the president’s budget bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax cuts and a major increase in defence spending. He stated that “a bill can be either big or beautiful, but it cannot be both,” referring to Trump’s description of it as a “big, beautiful bill.” He warned that the bill could seriously undermine the DOGE mission.
He also called the president’s flagship tax legislation too expensive.
Tensions had also emerged between Musk and several Trump cabinet officials. Musk initially pledged to cut “at least $2 trillion” from the federal government budget, but later revised the target to $150 billion. He openly criticised White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him a “moron” for rejecting his proposal for “zero tariffs” between the US and Europe.
As a result of the DOGE programme, around 260,000 out of the 2.3 million-strong federal civilian workforce have either been made redundant or accepted voluntary severance.
Musk’s exit was as low-key as his appointment, with no formal discussion with the president. However, he had been permitted to serve as a special federal employee for up to 130 days a year, and Trump had previously announced that Musk’s tenure would end in May.
The Tesla and SpaceX owner has now pledged to refocus on his business interests, which have struggled during his political stint.
Tesla experienced a 13 per cent drop in sales, and a 45 per cent fall in stock prices—later recovering to a 10 per cent dip. Investors are facing a difficult period, while activists have launched aggressive campaigns to boycott the company.
Musk has spent roughly $300 million supporting Trump’s presidential campaign and other Republican causes. However, he now says he plans to reduce his political spending, stating: “I think I have done enough.” Despite promising Trump’s advisers a $100 million contribution this year, the funds have yet to be delivered.
Keep ReadingShow less
The ruling also blocks the tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately under emergency powers.
A US federal court has blocked most of Donald Trump’s tariffs from taking effect, lifting markets on Thursday even as the White House filed an appeal against the ruling.
The decision is a setback for Trump as he pushes to reshape US trade relations by using tariffs to bring governments to the negotiating table.
Trump’s trade war has unsettled financial markets with the staggered introduction of import duties aimed at countries that sell more to the United States than they buy.
He argued that these trade deficits and drug inflows created a “national emergency” that justified the tariffs.
However, the three-judge Court of International Trade found Trump had overstepped his authority and barred most of the restrictions he had announced since taking office.
The White House criticised the ruling, saying that “unelected judges” should not intervene in Trump’s trade actions.
“President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness,” Trump’s spokesman Kush Desai said.
Attorneys for the administration filed an appeal against the ruling on Wednesday.
Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s top aides, wrote on social media that there had been a “judicial coup” that was “out of control.”
Trump announced the broad tariffs on April 2, setting a baseline of 10 per cent and introducing higher duties on dozens of economies, including China and the European Union.
The ruling also blocks the tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately under emergency powers.
The markets stabilised after Trump paused some of the larger tariffs for 90 days and suspended other duties while talks with individual countries and trade blocs were underway.
Asian markets rose after the ruling, while European and US futures also showed gains.
Japan’s trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa said as he left for more talks in Washington that Tokyo would review the ruling, after facing tariffs on cars.
‘Extraordinary threat’
The federal trade court was handling two cases brought by businesses and a group of state governments. They argued that Trump had overreached Congress’s power over public spending.
“The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (“IEEPA”) delegates these powers to the president in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world,” the three-judge panel wrote in an unsigned opinion.
“The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder.”
The court, which hears civil trade dispute cases, said any interpretation of the IEEPA giving unlimited tariff power to the president was unconstitutional.
The IEEPA allows the president to impose necessary economic measures during an emergency “to combat an unusual and extraordinary threat,” the court said.
The ruling gave the White House 10 days to complete the administrative steps to stop the tariffs.
Gregory W Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the decision confirmed that “these tariffs are an illegal abuse of executive power.”
“Trump’s declaration of a bogus national emergency to justify his global trade war was an absurd and unlawful use of IEEPA,” he said.
The Justice Department has defended Trump’s trade policy in court, arguing that judges have only limited authority in such matters. Critics say the administration has tried to take powers away from the other branches of government.
Trump has said that the tariffs would benefit Americans, highlighting early deals with Britain and China.
Analysts warn that the tariffs will increase costs for US consumers, driving up inflation and potentially causing the US central bank to keep interest rates higher for longer, adding more pressure on financial markets.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
The suspension comes after earlier moves by the White House to revoke visas and deport some foreign students who joined protests against the war in Gaza.
The US State Department suspended processing of student visas on Tuesday, as president Donald Trump’s administration sought tighter control over universities by cutting funding and restricting international enrollment.
The suspension comes after earlier moves by the White House to revoke visas and deport some foreign students who joined protests against the war in Gaza.
A cable signed by secretary of state Marco Rubio and seen by AFP instructs embassies and consulates to halt “any additional student or exchange visa... appointment capacity until further guidance is issued.”
The cable said the government would step up checks of the social media profiles of international applicants to US universities.
The New York Times reported that the suspension of interviews with visa applicants was temporary.
Rubio had earlier rescinded hundreds of visas, and the administration has taken steps to stop Harvard University from admitting non-American students.
Japan and Hong Kong have both asked their universities to take in foreign students affected by the US decision.
China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on Wednesday that Beijing called on Washington to “safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of international students, including those from China.”
Many Chinese students attend US universities, which are widely seen in China as important centres of learning.
Protests at Harvard
The suspension of visa processing coincided with protests by Harvard students on Tuesday. The protests followed an announcement by the government to cancel all remaining financial contracts with the university.
A judge has issued a restraining order ahead of a hearing set for Thursday, the same day as Harvard’s commencement graduation ceremony in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The White House has said it wants to direct public funds to vocational schools.
“The president is more interested in giving that taxpayer money to trade schools and programs and state schools where they are promoting American values, but most importantly, educating the next generation based on skills that we need in our economy and our society,” Karoline Leavitt said on Fox News Tuesday evening. “We need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University.”
Tuesday’s protest took place as news helicopters flew overhead and graduating students and their families gathered at a reception in Harvard Square.
“All my international friends and peers and professors and researchers are at risk and (are) threatened with being deported -- or their option is to transfer” to another university, said Alice Goyer, who joined the protest in a black academic gown.
A British student graduating this week, who gave his name only as Jack, said the Trump administration’s policies would make US universities less appealing to international students.
“I don’t know if I’d pursue a PhD here, six years is a long time,” he said.
Harvard has launched legal challenges to Trump’s measures, which legal experts expect to be overturned by the courts.
Separately, alumni plan to file a lawsuit against Trump on June 9, filmmaker Anurima Bhargava told a virtual meeting held by Crimson Courage, a grassroots alumni group raising funds for the legal challenge.
‘American values’
The government announced Tuesday that the contract cuts with Harvard would be worth an estimated $100 million, cutting business ties with the country’s oldest university.
Trump has accused universities of having a liberal bias and has singled out Harvard. In recent weeks, federal grants to Harvard have been frozen and federal contracts worth millions of dollars have been cancelled.
The university has sued to stop the revocation of its right to sponsor foreign students, who make up 27 per cent of its student body, and to reverse the loss of federal funding.
A legal expert said Harvard could add the latest contract cuts to its existing lawsuit.
“The case is so strong that the court system is not going to step to the side and allow this... to go forward,” said Ray Brescia, a professor at Albany Law School.
He said the courts would likely overturn Trump’s measures if they were appealed.
On Monday, Trump said he would continue to fight the university’s challenges, claiming that foreign students at Harvard included “radicalised lunatics, troublemakers.”
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post