The deal, reached after several weeks of talks, lowers levies on UK car exports from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent and lifts tariffs on British steel and aluminium.
Starmer and Donald Trump have announced a new UK-US trade agreement cutting tariffs on key British exports.
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer and US president Donald Trump on Thursday announced a trade agreement that reduces tariffs on British exports, including cars and steel.
The deal, reached after several weeks of talks, lowers levies on UK car exports from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent and lifts tariffs on British steel and aluminium. The UK government said the move would save Jaguar Land Rover hundreds of millions of pounds a year, with the reduction applying to a quota of 100,000 cars — close to Britain’s total exports last year.
“This is a really fantastic, historic day,” Starmer said, appearing via video link with Trump during parallel press conferences in London and Washington. “It’s going to not only protect jobs, but create jobs, opening market access,” he said, adding a “tribute” to both negotiating teams.
Speaking at a Jaguar Land Rover factory in the Midlands, Starmer said, “That is a huge and important reduction.”
The agreement also includes reciprocal market access for beef, with UK farmers allowed a tariff-free quota of 13,000 metric tonnes. The UK government said British food standards remain unchanged and confirmed that chlorinated chicken will not be allowed into the country.
There will be no change to the UK’s digital services tax on US tech firms as part of the deal.
“This is just the start,” Starmer said. “We’re more ambitious for what the UK and the US can do together.” He said he learned of Trump’s approval for the deal during a phone call on Wednesday night while watching Arsenal’s Champions League match against Paris Saint-Germain.
Trump called the agreement a “breakthrough” and the first step in broader negotiations. “I’m thrilled to announce that we have reached a breakthrough trade deal with the United Kingdom,” he said. “The deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports, especially in agriculture.”
Trump denied exaggerating the scope of the agreement, calling it a “maxed-out deal” in response to a question.
The UK will continue to face a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most goods under the reciprocal tariff policy introduced by Trump in April, though there are exemptions for certain products such as pharmaceuticals.
Downing Street said negotiators would continue talks to lift remaining tariffs and seek exemptions from future levies. The UK government added that Britain would receive “preferential treatment” in any future US tariff decisions.
A UK government official described the agreement as a “general terms document” covering key sectors and providing a framework for further negotiations, rather than a full free trade agreement. The official said more talks would follow, especially on tariffs affecting the pharmaceutical sector.
The trade deal was announced days after Britain signed a free-trade agreement with India, its largest such deal since leaving the European Union.
Trump said Starmer had been a “tough negotiator” during his visit to the White House in February. Starmer’s visit included delivering an invitation from King Charles III for a second state visit for Trump.
While the UK has not yet responded with retaliatory tariffs, the European Union on Thursday proposed new duties on US planes and cars if its own negotiations with Washington fail.
A child is hoisted into a small boat as migrants wait in the water for a 'taxi boat' to take them across the channel to the UK at dawn on September 19, 2025 in Gravelines, France. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
BRITAIN's plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) to assess the ages of asylum seekers has sparked concern among human rights groups, who warn the technology could misclassify children as adults and deny them vital protections.
The government intends to introduce facial age-estimation technology in 2026 to verify the ages of migrants claiming to be under 18, particularly those arriving on small boats from France. Officials say the move will help prevent adults from posing as children to exploit the asylum system.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under growing pressure to control migration, as Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration Reform UK party gains support in opinion polls. More than 35,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats this year, a 33 per cent rise on the same period in 2024.
Meanwhile, rights campaigners and social workers argue that assessing the age of migrants is a complex and sensitive process that cannot be replaced by technology.
“Assessing the ages of migrants is a complex process which should not be open to shortcuts,” said Luke Geoghegan, head of policy and research at the British Association of Social Workers. “This should never be compromised for perceived quicker results through artificial intelligence.”
Children who arrive in the UK without parents or guardians are entitled to legal aid, education, and social worker support under the care of local authorities. Charities fear that using facial recognition systems could result in minors being wrongly placed in adult asylum hotels, without proper safeguarding or support.
The Home Office said the technology would not be used in isolation. “Robust age assessments for migrants are vital to maintaining border security,” a spokesperson said. “This technology will not be used alone, but as part of a broad set of methods used by trained assessors.”
Governments worldwide are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to manage migration. Britain announced in April that it would deploy AI tools to speed up asylum decisions, helping caseworkers summarise interviews and analyse country-specific data. In July, it signed a partnership with OpenAI to explore how to use AI in education, justice, defence, and security.
But rights groups have warned that asylum seekers should not be used as test subjects for unproven technologies. “The asylum system must not be the testing ground for deeply flawed AI tools operating with minimal transparency,” said Sile Reynolds, head of asylum advocacy at Freedom from Torture.
Anna Bacciarelli, senior AI researcher at Human Rights Watch, said facial age estimation could “undermine privacy and other human rights”, adding: “We don’t actually know if it works.”
Facial recognition technologies have previously faced criticism for extracting sensitive biometric data and reinforcing racial or gender biases. They have also been used by London’s police at protests and public events, including the Notting Hill Carnival.
“There are always going to be worries about sensitive biometric data being taken from vulnerable people and used against them,” said Tim Squirrell, head of strategy at tech rights group Foxglove. “The machine tells you that you’re 19 – how do you question that? It’s completely unaccountable.”
Experts say AI models trained on biased or incomplete data can reproduce historic prejudices. The Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU) said some young asylum seekers had been told they were too tall or too hairy to be under 18.
“Children are being treated as subjects of immigration control, not as children,” said Rivka Shaw, a GMIAU policy officer, describing the practice as “linked to racism and adultification.”
The Helen Bamber Foundation found that nearly half of migrants reassessed in 2024 – about 680 people – were actually children wrongly sent to adult accommodation.
“A child in adult housing is put in a shared room with strangers and no safeguarding checks,” said Kamena Dorling, the foundation’s policy director.
A July report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration urged the Home Office to involve trained child-protection professionals in age decisions.
“Decisions on age should be made by child-protection professionals,” said Dorling. “All the concerns we have about human decision-making also apply to AI decision-making.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.