Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

The black and white rule for royal staff

The black and white rule for royal staff

By Amit Roy

THE royal family can demonstrate it no long­er has a problem recruiting black and Asian staff by giving senior jobs to suitably qualified candidates – ladies in waiting, personal secre­taries, senior press officers and the like.


Home Office minutes reveal that back in the late 1960s, “coloured immigrants or foreign­ers” could not be trusted to do even clerical jobs. If you weren’t white, you were consid­ered good enough only to work as domestic servants at Buckingham Palace.

Employing non-white staff has always been a problem for the royal family. The Home Of­fice documents brought to mind the jealousy that the Munshi evoked when Queen Victoria made him one of her most trusted advisers. Mohammed Abdul Karim arrived from India as a “gift” to Victoria and remained with her for 14 years until her death in 1901. Although he was meant to be a servant, Victoria pro­moted him, called him her “Munshi” (teach­er) and had a go at learning Urdu from him. I have long considered Victoria to be a radical woman ahead of her time.

The lobby against the Munshi was led by her son. Once he succeeded her to the throne as Edward VII, almost his first action was to burn all his mother’s letters to Karim and de­port him to India.

I first learnt about the Munshi, as I did about the spy Noor Inayat Khan, at least 30 years ago from historian Kusoom Vadgama. Sushila Anand, daughter of Indian novelist Mulk Raj Anand, gave me a copy of her 1996 book, Indian Sahib: Queen Victoria’s Dear Abdul, when I went to interview the author at her home in Primrose Hill in north London.

Book

Sushila also showed me a copy of another of her books – Queen Victoria’s Maharajah: Duleep Singh 1838-93 – which she had co-au­thored with Michael Alexander. It seems class rather than colour has been the deciding fac­tor for the British royal family, which has al­ways been comfortable befriending Indian princes. The late Maharajah and Maharani of Jaipur, for example, were close polo playing pals of the Queen and Prince Philip.

But in modern Britain, would the Queen employ a sari-clad Indian woman as her Lady in waiting? When she first did a tour of the Commonwealth in 1952, she took with her Pamela, daughter of Lady Edwina Mountbat­ten, former vicereine of India. The top jobs have always gone to members of the British aristocracy. When Charles and Diana were first experiencing marriage problem, one of her sisters, Lady Jane Fellowes, was married to Lord Robert Fellowes, secretary to the Queen.

Buckingham Palace has probably felt that Asian and black staff could not be trusted to keep royal secrets. But a number of former press officers have made careers as commen­tators on royal matters. The Queen’s govern­ess, Marion “Crawfie” Crawford, was cut off in retirement after penning a harmless memoir, The Little Princesses. If employing black and brown people can prove a problem, one can only imagine the psychological adjustments required to accept someone like Meghan Mar­kle into the royal family. Back in the 1960s, she would have been eligible to apply for a job, say, as a waitress or a cleaner.

But to be fair, in the last half century British society has moved on and so has the royal family. But it is still unlikely that even the younger royals have any British Asians or Af­ro-Caribbeans in their close circle of friends. And this extends to royal reporters on national newspapers who are mostly white. Pakistani-origin Martin Bashir committed two crimes – use dodgy documents to wheedle his way into Diana’s presence, and getting a huge scoop by landing an exclusive interview with the Prin­cess. He should have kept to his station in life. He would have been fantastic as a footman.

But to be serious, the royal family, which is progressive when it comes to international af­fairs, will continue to play a central role in the life of this country for decades to come be­cause the vast majority of people desire it to be so. But the royal family also has to be seen to be preparing for life in a multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-religious United King­dom. Disclosure of the colour bar on staff has been very damaging.

More For You

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less