“WHY is Tantra so often equated with sex? And where does this stereotype come from?”
This was the first question posed by someone called Julia Thompson when the British Museum launched a “landmark” exhibition Tantra: Enlightenment to Revolution, aimed at “demystifying” the ancient Indian practice.
Imma Ramos, curator of the exhibition which has brought together more than 100 objects from India, Nepal, Tibet, Japan and the UK from the seventh century to the present, called it “a great question”.
Pointing out “the Tantras were translated into English during the 19th century colonial period”, Ramos replied: “Their contents were often misunderstood, and this went on to form current misunderstandings of Tantra in the west. And tantric imagery of an erotic nature was often misunderstood as well. So the philosophical underpinnings of the texts and of the imagery were misinterpreted.”
Then the swinging 60s came along in Britain, continued Ramos: “By the 1960s and 1970s, you have a very different reading of this material. Tantra becomes associated with the free love movement. It’s seen as reflecting a liberal approach to sex.”
At the exhibition’s launch, the British Museum’s director, Hartwig Fischer, acknowledged: “Tantra has been the subject of great fascination. However, it has often been misunderstood, particularly the way it has been interpreted as a hedonistic guide to sex.”
The lead sponsor of the exhibition is the Bagri Foundation, whose trustee, Alka Bagri, said: “The exhibition will be an opportunity for visitors to see and understand its founding philosophy and get an insight beyond eroticism as understood in the west, and its association with fear in the east. The foundation believes that traditional ideas of Tantra are wholly relevant to a contemporary world.”
A leading Tantra scholar, Prof Madhu Khanna, Tagore National Fellow at the National Museum, New Delhi, revealed: “Britain played a major role in disseminating Tantra art in the 60s. It was the epicentre of the Tantra movement. In the 70s, the Hayward Gallery in London opened its doors to the collection of Tantra art from India.
“Can Tantra be a revolutionary tool for enlightenment? I think so. The perennial wisdom of Tantra is perfectly in sync with contemporary aspirations. That all forms of life on planet are bound by symbiotic inter-relationships may well serve as an inspiring source for an ecologically conscious spirituality.”
It was left to Ramos to explain the complex ideas behind Tantra.
“Originating in sixth-century India, Tantra has been linked to successive waves of revolutionary thought, from its early medieval transformation of Hinduism and Buddhism to the Indian fight for independence and the rise of 1960s counterculture in the West,” she said.
“Tantra is rooted in sacred instructional texts called Tantras. They take their name from the Sanskrit word tan, meaning to weave or compose, and often written as a dialogue between a god and goddess.
“The Tantra has taught active engagement with spiritual obstacles, such as desire, aversion and fear, in order to ultimately transcend them. Tantric imagery is therefore unique in its inclusion of erotic and macabre symbolism.”
She explained how Tantra came to be associated with shakti or female empowerment. “Power is absolutely central to Tantra. It presented a new world view, animated by shakti – divine feminine power.”
Ramos went on: “New tantric goddesses were introduced into the Hindu and Buddhist pantheons. What made them specifically tantric was their intertwining of destructive and maternal power, which challenges traditional models of womanhood as passive.”
She referred to a temple sculpture representing the Tantric goddess Chamunda. One from the 11th century “shows her dancing ecstatically after her rampage against demons on the cosmic battlefield. She’s a skeletal vision to behold, with a skull-like face and glaring eyes; her nakedness is ornamented with a garland of heads. She carries a sword of wisdom, with which she destroys not only demons, but also obstacles to enlightenment, such as devotees’ ego, their attachment to a false sense of self.”
Ramos also talked about the yogini: “The word yogini not only refers to the goddesses, but also to female practitioners of Tantra or yoga. Many tantric texts describe women as superior gurus or teachers in that embodiment of shakti.”
She dealt with Tantra’s association with sex: “One of the themes the exhibition explores is the role of sex and divine union in Tantra in order to confront some of the more prevalent stereotypes. In tantric texts, gendered symbolism is often used to articulate the two qualities to be cultivated on the path towards enlightenment – wisdom and compassion. These are visualised as a goddess representing wisdom and a god representing compassion in sexual union. The goal is to internalise their qualities by visualising the deities uniting in the body through meditation.
“The role of human remains in Tantra is still misunderstood in the West. This goes back to the 19th century colonial period when British officials encountered these instruments and associated them with black magic.”
One part of the exhibition “explores the role of Tantra during British rule in India, and how tantric goddesses were harnessed for their insurgent potential during the fight for Indian independence”.
One figure of the tantric goddess Kali from the late 19th century was made in Bengal, an early centre of Tantra as well as the nucleus of British rule.
“A garland of severed heads hangs from her neck, corpses from her ears and hands from her girdle. Her mouth is smeared with blood and she sticks out her tongue as though thirsting for more. On the surface, she appears fierce, but she’s approached as a mother figure. The heads represent the ego which Kali helps her devotees to transcend. She is shown standing on her husband, the god Shiva. According to tantric belief, existence results from the union between shakti as creative force, embodied here by Kali, and Shiva as pure consciousness.
“The image of Kali striding over Shiva symbolises the superiority of the female principle within Tantra. Kali was completely misunderstood by Christian missionaries and colonial officials who saw her as demonic.”
A popular prints made by the Ravi Varma press “was reproduced in a Christian missionary text as a reflection of India’s so-called depravity. Indian revolutionaries in Bengal harnessed Kali’s radical potential, playing on British anxiety and paranoia. They reimagined her and other tantric goddesses as figureheads of resistance, and symbols of an independent India rising up against the British.”
Ramos spoke of how Tantra came to the west. “In Britain and the US, Tantra had an important impact on the period’s radical politics, where it was interpreted as a movement that could inspire anti-capitalist, ecological and free love ideals. In the west Tantra was reimagined as a cult of ecstasy that could challenge stifled attitudes to sexuality.
“A 1960s psychedelic poster by London-based designers drew on tantric images of deities in union in order to communicate this idea. Mick Jagger had a logo designed for the Rolling Stones inspired by Kali. It was chosen to convey the band’s rebellious anti-establishment spirit.”
Tantra: Enlightenment to Revolution is on at the British Museum until January 24, 2021
A UK court on Thursday denied bail to fugitive Indian diamond businessman Nirav Modi, who sought release while awaiting extradition to India. Modi cited potential threats to his life and said he would not attempt to flee Britain.
Modi, 55, has been in custody in the UK since March 2019. He left India in 2018 before details emerged of his alleged involvement in a large-scale fraud at Punjab National Bank.
He denies any wrongdoing, according to his lawyer. His extradition to India was approved by UK courts, and his appeals, including a request to approach the UK Supreme Court, were rejected in 2022.
On Thursday, Modi’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told the High Court that the extradition could not take place for confidential legal reasons. "There are confidential legal reasons why (Modi) cannot be extradited," he said, without providing further details.
Representing Indian authorities, lawyer Nicholas Hearn opposed the bail application, arguing that Modi might try to escape or interfere with witnesses. Hearn referred to Modi’s past attempt to seek citizenship in Vanuatu as an indication he might flee.
Fitzgerald responded that Modi would not leave the UK due to fear of the Indian government. He mentioned alleged recent plots to target Sikh activists in the United States and Canada, which India has denied. He also cited India's alleged involvement in returning Sheikha Latifa, daughter of Dubai’s ruler, to Dubai in 2018.
"The reach of the Indian government for extrajudicial reprisals is practically limitless," Fitzgerald said. "The idea that he could go to Vanuatu ... and there be safe from the Indian government is utterly ridiculous. They would either send a hit squad to get him or they would kidnap him or they would lean on the government to deport him."
The Indian High Commission in London did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Judge Michael Fordham denied the bail plea, saying, "there are substantial grounds for believing that if released by me on bail ... (Modi) would fail to surrender".
Modi is wanted in India in connection with two linked cases — a major fraud at Punjab National Bank and alleged laundering of the proceeds.
His uncle Mehul Choksi, also linked to the case, was arrested in Belgium last month. Choksi has denied any wrongdoing.
Sky TV customers across the UK faced widespread disruption on Thursday night, with issues continuing into Friday morning despite the company saying things were back to normal.
The problems, which began around 9pm, saw more than 30,000 users unable to access TV content. Most complaints were linked to Sky Q boxes crashing or freezing. Some viewers were stuck with error messages saying they couldn’t watch TV due to “connectivity issues” even though their internet seemed fine.
— (@)
By Friday morning, over 2,500 users were still reporting trouble, according to tracking site DownDetector. Most problems (87%) were TV-related, while a smaller number mentioned full blackouts or broadband issues.
DownDetector chart shows view of problems reported in the last 24 hours Downdetector
Sky said the issue stemmed from a technical glitch that pushed some Sky Q boxes into standby mode. “We’re sorry some customers had trouble accessing Sky Q,” the company said. “The issue was quickly resolved, and service has been restored.”
However, many users said otherwise. On social media and DownDetector, complaints kept coming in. Some said rebooting the Sky box worked temporarily, only for it to crash again. Others were irritated by the lack of updates from Sky, especially as the blackout clashed with the Eurovision Song Contest semi-final, a big night for live TV.
“I’ve restarted my box six times already. It just keeps going off again,” one user in Southport wrote. Another from Sheffield posted: “Still down this morning.”
Sky recommends a basic fix: unplug your Sky Q box from the power socket for 30 seconds, then turn it back on. For some, that’s worked. For others, the issue returns after a while.
Downdetector shows the most affected locations and problems Downdetector
Posting on X this morning, the official Sky account shared : "We are aware of some technical issues overnight that led to Sky Q boxes to go into standby mode. Our technical team worked quickly to investigate and restore service.
"If your Sky Q box is still stuck in standby please switch off your Sky Q box at the power socket for 30 seconds and back on again which will restore service. We’re sorry for any inconvenience caused."
Sky’s own help page offers a few steps to try: reboot the box, check Wi-Fi, update the software, and make sure your remote and connections are working. But when none of that helps, users are left in the dark.
DownDetector, a platform that tracks service interruptions, showed how the problem spread and continued, even after Sky’s official fix.
This article was updated following Sky’s public statement issued on Friday morning.
Keep ReadingShow less
Disability campaigners from 'Dignity in Dying' hold placards as they demonstrate outside The Palace of Westminster during a gathering in favour of the proposals to legalise assisted suicide in the UK.
A PROPOSED law that would allow assisted dying for terminally ill people will return to parliament on Friday, with lawmakers set to debate a series of changes before a final vote on whether the bill should proceed.
In November, lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in favour of allowing assisted dying. If passed, the legislation would make Britain one of several countries including Australia, Canada, and some US states to permit assisted dying.
The bill allows mentally competent adults in England and Wales, who have six months or less to live, to end their lives with medical assistance. It has already been revised following detailed scrutiny.
A final vote on the updated bill will take place after Friday’s debate. The large number of proposed amendments means the session may continue next month.
Supporters of the bill point to opinion polls showing most Britons favour assisted dying and say the law should reflect public opinion. However, some lawmakers have raised concerns about protections for vulnerable people. Others argue that palliative care should be improved first.
The Telegraph and Guardian reported that some lawmakers who previously supported the bill are now reconsidering their position.
Prime minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government is neutral on the issue. Lawmakers are free to vote based on their personal views rather than party lines.
A key change from the original version of the bill is the removal of the requirement for court approval. Instead, a panel including a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker would decide whether a person is terminally ill and capable of making the decision.
Any further changes to the bill will need to be approved through separate votes. If Friday’s debate runs out of time, the discussion could continue on June 13, before the final vote.
If passed, the bill will move to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
In 2015, lawmakers rejected similar legislation by 330 votes to 118.
The current bill does not apply to Northern Ireland or Scotland. On Tuesday, the Scottish parliament voted in favour of a similar proposal, which will now move forward for further consideration.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
India's defence minister Rajnath Singh said, 'I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure.'
INDIA's defence minister Rajnath Singh on Friday said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) should reconsider its decision to approve a $1 billion loan to Pakistan, alleging that Islamabad was using the funds to support terrorism.
"I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure," Singh told troops at an air force base in western India. "I believe any economic assistance to Pakistan is nothing less than funding terror."
India and Pakistan had engaged in missile, drone and artillery strikes last week before a ceasefire began on Saturday.
The IMF last week approved a review of its loan programme for Pakistan, unlocking about $1 billion and approving a further $1.4 billion bailout. India objected to the decision but abstained from the review vote.
India, which represents Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh on the IMF board, said in a finance ministry statement that it had "concerns over the efficacy of IMF programmes in case of Pakistan given its poor track record".
Pakistan was on the verge of default in 2023 amid a political crisis and economic downturn. The IMF extended a $7 billion bailout to Pakistan last year, its 24th such assistance since 1958.
Singh said, "It is now clear that in Pakistan terrorism and their government are hand in glove with each other.
"In this situation there is a possibility that their nuclear weapons could get their way into the hands of terrorists. This is a danger not just for Pakistan but the entire world."
The recent fighting between India and Pakistan began on May 7, when India launched strikes on what it called "terrorist camps" in Pakistan. The strikes followed an April attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people.
India blamed Pakistan for supporting the terrorists it said were responsible for the attack. Pakistan has denied the charge.
The four-day exchange of missiles, drones and artillery killed around 70 people on both sides, including dozens of civilians.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Koolesh Shah, Reena Ranger OBE, Ameet Jogia and Sir Oliver Dowden
SIR OLIVER DOWDEN MP and businessman Koolesh Shah have been appointed co-chairs of the Conservative Friends of India (CF India), following the resignation of Ameet Jogia MBE and Reena Ranger OBE, who had led the organisation since 2019.
Jogia and Ranger stepped down after a five-year term that saw CF India grow into the Conservative party’s largest affiliate group, a statement said. The group was founded by Lord Dolar Popat with prime minister David Cameron in 2012.
Appointed by then-prime minister Boris Johnson, their leadership coincided with two general elections, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the appointment of Britain’s first prime minister of Indian origin, Rishi Sunak.
Sir Oliver is a senior Tory MP who has held several ministerial roles, including deputy prime minister and secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport. Shah, founder of the London Town Group, is active in philanthropy and community work, particularly in education and social mobility. Sir Oliver and Shah said, “It is a privilege to take on this responsibility and build on the outstanding work of Ameet and Reena. CF India plays a vital role in ensuring that the voice of the British Indian community is heard, valued, and represented in the political mainstream, especially during this highly sensitive time. We are committed to deepening that engagement, supporting the next generation of leaders, and continuing to celebrate the values we share – from entrepreneurship to public service, and from community cohesion to our enduring ties with India.”
Under the outgoing co-chairs, CF India said it significantly strengthened the party’s engagement with British Indian communities. According to the statement, the group played a key role in the 2024 general election, contributing to the Tory victory in Leicester East, where the party’s vote share rose from 11 per cent in 2001 to 49 per cent.
Jogia and Ranger also oversaw the development of outreach, training, and fundraising initiatives. They credited CF India’s director, Nayaz Qazi, and grassroots supporters for their contributions to the group’s progress.
In their farewell statement, Jogia and Ranger said, “We leave with immense pride, having brought vibrancy, energy, and renewed purpose to an organisation that has been integral to our political journeys from the start. We will always support CF India and its new leadership.”