PRIME minister Boris Johnson has agreed to a request from the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, for a review to determine whether he stuck to the rules on ministerial declarations.
The move caps days of criticism over the financial arrangements of Sunak’s family and the allegation of “political hypocrisy” as questions emerged over offshore tax havens reportedly held by his wife Akshata Murty, an Indian national.
Sunak was also criticised for a lack of transparency after he admitted to holding a "green card" for US permanent residents until last year.
The chancellor said last Sunday (10) he had written to Johnson asking him to refer his ministerial declarations to Christopher Geidt, the independent adviser on ministers' interests.
Murty, daughter of Indian IT major Infosys co-founder NR Narayana Murthy, said last week she would start paying UK tax on "all worldwide income" as she sought to defuse the controversy over her non-domicile tax status that has cast a shadow on Sunak’s political fortunes.
But Labour frontbench MP Louise Haigh told BBC radio Sunak had "come out on a number of occasions to try and muddy the waters" around his family's tax affairs.
She conceded the non-domicile status enjoyed by Murty - shielding her overseas income from Infosys against UK taxes - was legal.
Haigh, however, queried "whether it was right that the chancellor of the exchequer, whilst piling on 15 separate tax rises to the British public, was benefiting from a tax scheme that allowed his household to pay significantly less to the tune of potentially tens of millions of pounds".
The Independent newspaper reported that Sunak was listed as the beneficiary of trusts set up in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands to help manage his wife's tax and business affairs.
Sunak was listed in 2020 after he became chancellor and after his previous stint as chief secretary to the treasury, the newspaper said.
"No one in Akshata's family is aware of this alleged trust," a spokeswoman close to the Sunak family said in response.
As chancellor, Sunak oversaw a huge programme of government spending during the coronavirus pandemic, but is now tightening the belt just as Britons face the worst cost-of-living crisis in generations.
Once a leading contender to succeed Johnson as the prime minister, Sunak has seen his popularity plummet in recent weeks, and has accused critics of mounting a "smear" campaign against his wife.
Allies of the chancellor have said Johnson's office is waging a political hit job.
They said the prime minister believed Sunak had not backed him strongly enough during an ongoing scandal into Downing Street lockdown parties.
Johnson last Friday (8) denied knowledge of any briefing operation against Sunak, and told reporters his chancellor was doing an "absolutely outstanding job".
The White House meanwhile declined to comment about Sunak's green card, which he said he only gave up ahead of his first visit to the US as the chancellor in October last year.
Under US law, possession of the card meant that Sunak intended to live in America and pay US taxes, despite serving as Britain's second-most powerful politician.
Sunak and Murty met as students in the US and they married in 2009.
Murty, 42, owns shares worth almost a billion dollars in Infosys, according to the company's disclosure to stock exchanges.
This makes her richer than the Queen, whose personal wealth is estimated at £350 million.
The couple owns at least four properties, including a £7m five-bedroom house in upscale Kensington, London, and a flat in Santa Monica, California.
Murty is also the director of venture capital company Catamaran Ventures which she founded with Sunak in 2013.
She confirmed last week that she "is treated as non-domiciled for UK tax purposes", meaning returns from her Infosys stake are only liable for taxation outside Britain.
Sunak told the Sun newspaper that "to smear my wife to get at me is awful".
He said, "it would not be reasonable or fair to ask her to sever ties with her country because she happens to be married to me".
Murty created her own fashion label, Akshata Designs, in 2010.
According to a 2011 Vogue profile, she works with artists in remote villages to create Indian-meets-Western fusion clothes that are "vehicles to discovering Indian culture".
"I believe we live in a materialistic society," she told the magazine. "People are becoming more conscious about the world they live in. Doing good is fashionable."
(Agencies)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

England is preparing tougher rules to prevent pupils from accessing mobile phones during the school day, with schools facing questions over enforcement and funding
iStock
England pupil mobile phone policy: Will schools have the resources to enforce it?
Nov 10, 2026
- Schools will have to go beyond policies that allow pupils to keep switched-off phones in their bags.
- Head teachers' unions warn that secure storage systems could create significant costs.
- Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are taking different approaches to restricting phones in schools.
Schools in England are preparing for a stricter approach to mobile phones, with pupils expected to be unable to access their devices at any point during the school day from September 2027. But while ministers want to move beyond policies that allow phones to remain switched off in school bags, head teachers are questioning how they will pay for the change.
The government is strengthening its statutory guidance to ensure schools adopt measures that keep phones physically out of pupils' reach, rather than simply requiring them to remain unseen and unheard.
Education Secretary Lucy Powell said the government's message to parents and pupils was that "school is for learning and friendship, not scrolling".
The Department for Education said access to phones risks pulling children away from their learning and from each other.
The announcement builds on existing restrictions. Statutory guidance became effective on June 29, 2026, requiring schools in England to have policies that prevent pupils from accessing mobile phones throughout the school day, including lessons, breaks and lunchtime. Schools were expected to begin following it from September 1.
However, the existing guidance leaves head teachers with flexibility over how they enforce the rules. Some schools have adopted a "no see, no hear" approach, allowing pupils to keep their phones in their bags as long as they are not visible or audible.
The revised guidance, expected to take effect in September 2027, will go further by requiring schools to ensure pupils cannot access their devices during the day.
How will schools enforce the stricter phone rules?
Schools will be able to decide how to implement the updated requirements, depending on their facilities and individual circumstances.
Some have already invested in sealed pouches that prevent pupils from using their phones until they are unlocked. Others provide secure lockers, collect devices at the beginning of the school day or prohibit pupils from bringing phones onto school grounds.
These approaches, however, require different levels of investment and staff involvement.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), said mobile phones could create safety issues and become an unhelpful distraction during the school day. But he warned that more robust restrictions would come at a cost.
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said the new guidance provided some clarity but cautioned that schools could not simply make phones disappear.
"If all schools are going to be expected to have lockable pouches or other secure storage facilities for every pupil, the cost involved will be very significant indeed," he said.
"This is not feasible unless the government puts in the funding required to meet these costs."
The financial question could become particularly important for schools with large pupil populations, where buying individual storage pouches or installing secure facilities could require substantial upfront spending.
The unions are therefore asking the government to provide additional financial support rather than expecting schools to absorb the expense within already stretched budgets.
Why does the government want phones out of schools?
Ministers argue that restricting access to smartphones will help pupils concentrate, reduce disruption and encourage more face-to-face interaction.
Dame Rachel de Souza, Children's Commissioner for England, welcomed stronger action to prevent phones from distracting pupils and disrupting the school day.
Charlotte Ashton, co-founder of campaign group Generation Focus, also supported the move, arguing that existing "no see, no hear" policies were not working effectively. She said pupils were still "TikToking in the toilets".
"Ultimately, we need to get to a point where it's not normal for every single child to have a personal internet-enabled device in their pockets with them 24/7," she said.
The announcement also drew support from the opposition. Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said she was "delighted that Labour have finally listened to us and agreed to properly ban smartphones in schools".
However, she questioned the government's wider approach to technology in classrooms, arguing that its policies lacked joined-up thinking. She also welcomed a review of safety standards for educational technology, which ministers have announced alongside the phone guidance changes.
The debate is not limited to England. Education is a devolved responsibility, meaning Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can adopt their own approaches.
Scotland's government has proposed legislation to restrict personal phone use in schools and launched a consultation on the issue. In Wales, the Senedd voted against introducing a national statutory ban, leaving schools with flexibility over their own policies.
Northern Ireland's Education Minister Paul Givan launched a 12-week consultation in August on whether mobile phones should be prohibited in schools by law.
The school restrictions are also separate from the UK government's planned social media restrictions for under-16s, expected to begin in March 2027. Those measures would prevent children from accessing platforms including Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.
For schools in England, the immediate challenge is turning the government's expectations into workable policies. While there is growing political and public support for reducing smartphone distractions, the success of the stricter rules will depend on consistent enforcement, practical arrangements and whether schools receive the resources to implement them.
The government wants school days without accessible phones. Head teachers now want to know who will pay to make that possible.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
Study attributes decline in academic freedom to restriction of free speech
Vibhuti Pathak
05 April 2024










