Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Suing Home Office may not be in Rutnam’s best interests

By Amit Roy

SIR PHILIP RUTNAM, who resigned last Saturday (29) as permanent secretary at the Home Office after clashing with home secretary Priti Patel, said he would be “issuing a claim against the Home Office for constructive dismissal”.


But is this wise?

His critics – and they appear to be growing in number – might express surprise, not that he has resigned, but he wasn’t sacked earlier for allowing the Windrush scandal to fester under his watch.

Many West Indians, who had lived in Britain for most of their lives, were denied medical treatment, even if they had cancer, or were cruelly and wrongly deported to islands they had left as children.

Amber Rudd resigned as home secretary, but she has more or less blamed Rutnam for making himself scarce when the scandal broke and not doing enough to help her. Will she give evidence against Rutnam before an employment tribunal? Will the West Indians, whose lives have been blighted, also speak out against the man who apparently did nothing to anticipate or forestall the shameful incident?

Perhaps the modern version of Sir Humphrey Appleby from cult TV show Yes Minister simply didn’t like taking orders from an Indian woman he considered his intellectual and social inferior. In his resignation statement, stage-managed before TV cameras to cause maximum damage to the home secretary, he said he had “encouraged her to change her behaviours”.

That was magnanimous of him (though I am not sure why he used the plural when ‘behaviour’ would have sufficed). Silly girl, he seemed to be implying, she wasn’t doing as she was told.

The Labour party, the civil service unions and other former and present permanent secretaries will back Rutnam, to be sure, but not everyone thinks that his track record is unblemished.

According to the Sunday Telegraph, “sources close to her predecessor Amber Rudd point out that Sir Philip, 54, did have ‘a remarkable ability to rub home secretaries up the wrong way’”.

Those sources might not be a million miles removed from Rudd herself. Rutnam was described as “quite cunning” and at times “purposefully opaque”.

A Home Office insider also told the paper: “He seemed to think Priti was stupid and treated her as such. Suffice to say it didn’t go down well.”

Rutnam was described as being “a bit Sir Humphreyish, sneaky and a little snivelling”.

The paper added: “There is also the small matter of the review into the Windrush deportation scandal to consider.”

The Sun, too, doesn’t seem to be a great fan of Rutnam. It recalls he told MPs two months ago: “I’m not an expert on the immigration system.”

It reveals that the £190,000 a year head of the Home Office, “who presided over the Windrush scandal, was handed “a lump sum of between £15,000 and £20,000 in April”, as a “performance-related bonus last year”.

Rutnam won’t be pleased to read the Mail’s assessment that he was “lucky not to have been axed on numerous occasions.

“For those who have kept a keen eye on Whitehall over the past decade, the name Rutnam is a byword for bungled advice and toxic clashes with ministers. Dubbed ‘Sir Calamity’ by exasperated Downing Street officials, Rutnam... always seemed to be ‘missing’ when his neck was on the line.”

Priti has her enemies, though Theresa Villiers, the former environment secretary, called her a “highly effective home secretary” and said she was “sick of spiteful briefings against women in high public office”.

Maybe Priti is a demanding taskmistress. But Boris Johnson will remove her as home secretary only if he thinks she is not carrying out the government’s manifesto commitments on immigration and policing – and there is so far no sign of that.

Purely on the basis of what we know, I suggested last week that “Rutnam’s future doesn’t look very bright”. But if he is foolhardy enough to go to court, there is no guarantee that what little remains of his reputation won’t be left in tatters.

Many people – especially the suffering West Indians – will wonder whether he deserves to cling on to his gold-plated pension.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Shraddha Jain

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

FUNNY UK TOUR

The tidal wave of top Indian stand-up stars touring the UK continues with upcoming shows by Shraddha Jain this July. The hugely popular comedian – who has over a million Instagram followers – will perform her family-friendly show Aiyyo So Mini Things at The Pavilion, Reading (4), the Ondaatje Theatre, London (5), and The Old Rep Theatre, Birmingham (6). The 90-minute set promises an entertaining take on the mundane and uproarious aspects of everyday life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: How populist politicians tackle personality clashes

Elon Musk with Donald Trump

Comment: How populist politicians tackle personality clashes

THE US president Donald Trump and billionaire businessman Elon Musk went to war on social media.

Geert Wilders brought the Dutch government down after less than a year. Nigel Farage scrambled to hold his Reform team together.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
Doctor Who
Doctor Who

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

RANI MAKES RETURNDoctor Who acclaimed actress Archie Panjabi added to her diverse body of work by playing the iconic villain Rani in the recently concluded series of Doctor Who. She reprised the role originally portrayed by Kate O’Mara decades ago. Unfortunately, the series – available on BBC iPlayer – has been plagued by problems and suffered plummeting ratings, largely due to poor storylines. As a result, Archie and fellow cast member Varada Sethu are unlikely to return in future episodes.

Doctor Who


Keep ReadingShow less
Priya Mulji with participants

Priya Mulji with participants at a Thailand retreat

X/ Priya Mulji

Finding my tribe in an unexpected place

Priya Mulji

I turned 43 recently, and it was the best birthday of my life. Special for so many reasons. For the first time since my twenties, I spent my birthday abroad. (In case you were wondering – Phuket, Thailand.)

Last year, I impulsively booked myself onto my friend Urvashi’s mind, body and soul expansion experience. Since then, life has taken some unexpected turns – including being made redundant from my day job – so this trip could not have come at a better time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Slow progress on inclusion despite anti-racism rallies

Britain faces challenges in changing attitudes around diversity

Comment: Slow progress on inclusion despite anti-racism rallies

IT HAS been five years since the biggest anti-racism protests in a generation – but how far did they have a lasting legacy?

The protests across America after the murder of George Floyd spread to Britain too. There was no central organisation, nor a manifesto of demands, as students and sixth formers took to the streets.

Keep ReadingShow less