DIRE humanitarian conditions in Myanmar and Bangladesh are driving more Rohingya to risk dangerous boat journeys to safety, such as one this month that ended in a sinking and estimates of 427 deaths, the UN refugee agency said last Friday (23).
The minority community’s plight might have been worsened by aid funding cuts, the agency added.
The humanitarian sector has been hit by funding reductions from major donors, led by the US under president Donald Trump, and other Western countries as they prioritise defence spending prompted by growing fears over Russia and China.
Two boats carrying some 514 Rohingya sank on May 9 and 10, carrying refugees who were thought to have left from refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, and Rakhine State in Myanmar. Only 87 survivors were found, UNHCR said.
The possible deaths of 427 people would make it the deadliest tragedy at sea involving Rohingya refugees so far this year, according to the agency.
That people chose to board boats during the annual monsoon season, which brings dangers such as strong winds and rough seas, reflected their desperation, the agency added.
“The dire humanitarian situation, exacerbated by funding cuts, is having a devastating impact on the lives of Rohingya, with more and more resorting to dangerous journeys to seek safety, protection and a dignified life for themselves and their families,” said Hai Kyung Jun, director of UNHCR’s Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific.
“The latest tragedy is a chilling reminder that access to meaningful protection, especially in countries of first asylum, as well as responsibility sharing and collective efforts along sea routes, are essential to saving lives,” Kyung Jun added.
The agency urged more financial support for Rohingya refugees in host countries including Bangladesh, and those displaced inside Myanmar. Its request for $383.1 million (£282.8m) for support in 2025 is currently only 30 per cent funded, it said.
India's External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said trade or tariffs were not discussed in any conversations between Indian and US leaders during the clashes with Pakistan.
INDIA on Thursday said trade did not come up at all in discussions between Indian and American leaders during its military clashes with Pakistan, rejecting Washington’s claim that its offer of trade halted the confrontation.
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told a New York court that India and Pakistan reached a “tenuous ceasefire” after president Donald Trump offered both nations trading access with the US to avoid a “full-scale war.”
In the past few weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed he threatened India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with them if they did not stop the conflict. India has consistently said that the understanding on cessation of hostilities was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two countries.
“From the time Operation Sindoor commenced on May 7 till the understanding on cessation of firing and military action was reached on May 10, there were conversations between Indian and the US leaders on the evolving military situation,” external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. “The issue of trade or tariff did not come up in any of those discussions,” he said at his weekly media briefing.
Jaiswal was answering questions on the Trump administration’s submission at the New York court. “The external affairs minister has also made it clear that the cessation of firing was decided upon in direct contacts between the DGMOs of India and Pakistan,” Jaiswal said.
Lutnick made the submission in the Court of International Trade last week, while opposing any attempt to restrain Trump from using emergency powers to impose tariffs. Lutnick said the president’s power to impose tariffs is crucial to his ability to conduct diplomacy.
“For example, India and Pakistan – two nuclear powers engaged in combat operations just 13 days ago – reached a tenuous ceasefire on May 10. This ceasefire was only achieved after president Trump interceded and offered both nations trading access with the United States to avert a full-scale war,” Lutnick said.
“An adverse ruling that constrains presidential power in this case could lead India and Pakistan to question the validity of president Trump’s offer, threatening the security of an entire region, and the lives of millions,” he said.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers. (Photo: Reuters)
PAKISTAN and India are close to reducing troop levels along their border to those before the latest conflict began earlier this month, a senior Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday. He cautioned, however, that the recent fighting had raised the risk of escalation in the future.
Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery in four days of clashes before a ceasefire was announced.
The fighting began after an attack in Indian Kashmir on April 22 that killed 26 people, most of them tourists. New Delhi blamed the attack on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge denied by Islamabad.
On May 7, India launched missiles at what it said were "terrorist infrastructure" sites across the border. Pakistan responded with its own attacks, and both countries increased their troop presence along the frontier.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers.
"We have almost come back to the pre-22nd April situation... we are approaching that, or we must have approached that by now," said Mirza, the most senior Pakistani military official to speak publicly since the conflict.
India's ministry of defence and the office of the Indian chief of defence staff did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on Mirza's remarks.
Speaking in Singapore at the Shangri-La Dialogue forum, Mirza said there was no move towards nuclear weapons during this conflict, but it was a dangerous situation.
"Nothing happened this time," he said. "But you can't rule out any strategic miscalculation at any time, because when the crisis is on, the responses are different."
He said the risk of escalation in the future had grown, as the fighting this time was not limited to Kashmir. Both sides attacked military installations in their mainlands, but neither has acknowledged any serious damage.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan this month that New Delhi would target "terrorist hideouts" again if there were new attacks on India.
'Dangerous trend'
India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. Pakistan says it provides only moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination.
"This (conflict) lowers the threshold between two countries who are contiguous nuclear powers... in the future, it will not be restricted to the disputed territory. It would come down to (the) whole of India and (the) whole of Pakistan," Mirza said. "This is a very dangerous trend."
Reuters has reported that the rapid escalation of hostilities ended in part because of behind-the-scenes diplomacy involving the US, India and Pakistan, and the key role played by Washington in brokering peace. India has denied any third-party role in the ceasefire and said that any engagement between India and Pakistan has to be bilateral.
Mirza said international mediation might be more difficult in the future because of a lack of crisis management mechanisms between the two countries.
"The time window for the international community to intervene would now be very less, and I would say that damage and destruction may take place even before that time window is exploited by the international community," he said.
He said Pakistan was open to dialogue, but apart from a crisis hotline between the directors general of military operations and some hotlines at the tactical level on the border, there was no other communication between the two countries.
New Delhi has maintained a hard line on any possible talks.
“If there are talks, it will only be on terrorism and (Pakistan Kashmir)," Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh said on Friday. "If Pakistan is serious about talks, it should hand over terrorists... to India so that justice is served.”
Mirza said there were no backchannel discussions or informal talks to ease tensions. He also said he had no plans to meet General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, who is also in Singapore for the forum.
"These issues can only be resolved by dialogue and consultations, on the table. They cannot be resolved on the battlefield," Mirza said.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
A billboard featuring General Syed Asim Munir , Naval Chief Admiral Naveed Ashraf , and Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Babar Sidhu, along a road in Peshawar
POPULAR support has surged for Pakistan’s army chief General Asim Munir, the most powerful man in the country, after the worst conflict in decades with India, shattering criticism of interference in politics and harshly cracking down on opponents.
A grateful government gave him a rare promotion last week to field marshal “in recognition of the strategic brilliance and courageous leadership that ensured national security and decisively defeated the enemy”.
The military has ruled Pakistan for at least three decades since independence in 1947 and wielded extraordinary influence even with a civilian government in office. But it, and its hardline chief, have rarely received the widespread outpouring of affection seen this month that analysts say has reinforced the military’s dominance in the country.
“Long live General Asim Munir!” read placards held aloft in rallies in recent days in towns across Pakistan. His picture was put up on lamp posts and bridges, with some banners saying: “You are our saviour!”
A survey conducted after the conflict by Gallup Pakistan, a local pollster, found that 93 per cent of respondents felt their opinion of the military had improved. Munir’s most bitter domestic foe, jailed former prime minister Imran Khan, also congratulated the military after this month’s clashes with India, claimed by both nations as a victory.
“It’s my country, it’s my army,” Khan said in a post on X last week. “I pay tribute to the Pakistan Air Force and all our military personnel for their professionalism and outstanding performance.”
Yousuf Nazar, a political commentator, said of Munir: “He has emerged as Pakistan’s strongman with his military’s reputation restored as a formidable force.”
Six months after he took charge in November 2022, Munir was faced with the most serious challenge to the military’s hegemony when Khan’s supporters ransacked military installations.
Munir later faced sharp domestic criticism for the jailing of Khan and cracking down on supporters of his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, as well as what critics alleged was rigging the general election last year to favour a rival party.
But the conflict with India has turned that around, said Ayesha Siddiqa, author of Military Inc, a book on the Pakistan military.
“It has made the general stronger than any other previous generals. He is a hero now,” she said, adding that the contest between the neighbours will be headed by India’s prime minister Narendra Modi and Pakistan’s Munir, a devout Muslim.
The military did not respond to questions sent by Reuters.
Munir, who has memorised the Qu’ran, has underlined what he has said are fundamental differences between Islamic Pakistan and predominantly Hindu India.
“Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different,” he said in a speech in Islamabad a week before the attack in Indian Kashmir.
The Indian army “with all their wherewithal” cannot “intimidate” Pakistan, he said, peppering his
Keep ReadingShow less
Two men were sentenced in the US for a human smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals near the Canada-US border in 2022. (Representational image:iStock)
TWO human traffickers were sentenced on Wednesday for their roles in a smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals in 2022, the US Department of Justice said.
Harshkumar Ramanlal Patel, 29, was sentenced to over 10 years in prison for organising the logistics of the operation, while co-conspirator Steve Anthony Shand, 50, was sentenced to over six years for picking up migrants in the United States.
A jury found the pair guilty of their roles in what officials described as a "large-scale human smuggling operation that brought Indian nationals to Canada on fraudulent student visas and then smuggled them into the United States," according to the DOJ.
In January 2022, Patel and Shand tried to smuggle 11 Indian nationals from Canada into the United States on foot in severe weather conditions. The DOJ said the recorded wind chill was -37.8 degrees Celsius (-36 degrees Fahrenheit).
A US Border Patrol agent found Shand’s van stuck in the snow in Minnesota, where Shand claimed there were no other people stranded.
But five more people came out of the fields, and one of them was airlifted to a hospital for lifesaving care.
Shand was arrested with two migrants, while the family of four was found later by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Their frozen bodies were discovered in an isolated area in Canada.
"The boy was wrapped in a blanket with his father's frozen glove covering his face," the DOJ said.
"Every time I think about this case I think about this family -- including two beautiful little children -- who the defendants left to freeze to death in a blizzard," said Acting US Attorney Lisa D Kirkpatrick.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
This omicron subvariant has been detected in several US states
A new Covid variant originating in Asia is now spreading across the United States, raising questions about its impact and how widely it has spread. Known as NB.1.8.1, this omicron subvariant has been detected in several US states following a recent surge in cases in China. Despite its presence, another strain, LP.8.1, which descends from JN.1, remains the dominant variant in the country at present.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is closely monitoring NB.1.8.1 and maintains regular communication with international health authorities. An agency spokesperson confirmed to The Independent that while the CDC is aware of cases linked to NB.1.8.1 in China, there have been too few sequences identified in the US for it to appear on official federal variant tracking dashboards. However, the variant’s spread has caused significant increases in hospital admissions and emergency room visits in parts of Asia, prompting public health officials to watch its progression carefully.
What is NB.1.8.1 and where is it spreading?
NB.1.8.1 is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a SARS-CoV-2 variant under monitoring. The WHO currently tracks six such variants globally, including NB.1.8.1, which has been detected in 22 countries to date. In the US, confirmed cases have appeared in New York, California, Arizona, Ohio and Rhode Island, according to data collected by local health departments in collaboration with the CDC’s airport testing partner, Ginkgo Bioworks.
Although numbers remain low in the US, the WHO has noted a marked increase in the variant’s prevalence internationally from late March to April, suggesting it is gaining a foothold in various regions.
How concerning is NB.1.8.1?
At the global level, the WHO currently assesses the public health risk from NB.1.8.1 as low. Despite its spread, there is no evidence to suggest that this variant causes more severe illness than those already circulating.
The WHO statement clarifies that although there has been a rise in cases and hospitalisations in countries where NB.1.8.1 is common, it does not appear to increase disease severity compared with other variants.
However, NB.1.8.1 may have an advantage in transmissibility. Scientific studies indicate that this variant binds more effectively to human cells, potentially making it easier to spread from person to person. Subhash Verma, professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, told CBS News that the data shows NB.1.8.1 is more transmissible but does not result in more severe illness than previous variants.
Are current Covid vaccines effective against NB.1.8.1?
Yes, experts expect the Covid vaccines currently authorised in the US to remain effective against NB.1.8.1, particularly in preventing severe disease. Vaccination continues to be a crucial tool in managing the pandemic and reducing hospitalisations and deaths.
However, vaccine availability in the US faces new challenges. Recently, health officials announced that Covid vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women have been removed from the CDC’s recommended immunisation schedule. Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated it will continue to approve vaccine updates for older adults and people with underlying health conditions. These approvals will require vaccine manufacturers to carry out extensive new clinical trials before wider use is permitted.
This shift has raised concerns among public health experts. Dr Paul Offit, a vaccine specialist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told The Associated Press that limiting vaccine access could reduce availability and insurance coverage. He questioned how pharmacists would determine eligibility for those considered high-risk, warning this could make vaccination less accessible.
What should the public know?
For now, people in the US can still receive Covid vaccines, including updated booster shots where eligible. Despite the removal of certain groups from the recommended schedule, vaccinations remain a key defence against severe outcomes from Covid infections, including variants like NB.1.8.1.
Health authorities continue to monitor the evolving situation closely, particularly given the variant’s increased transmissibility. While NB.1.8.1 has not demonstrated more severe disease, its ability to spread more easily underscores the ongoing importance of vaccination, testing, and public health measures to limit transmission.
As with all emerging variants, ongoing surveillance and research will be essential to understand its full impact and to inform appropriate responses in the US and globally.
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post