EMERGING evidence from the NHS in the UK and from the US suggest a disproportionate impact of Covid-19 on patients and staff from black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities.
A recent study from King’s College, London, showed that BAME patients admitted to hospital with Covid-19 were, on average, a decade younger than their white European counterparts. BAME communities have been over-represented in deaths among healthcare professionals too. So significant is the concern that Public Health England has commissioned a rapid review into the inequity which is due to be published at the end of this month.
However, it is important to ensure that any advice or guidance is from respected sources, since one of the challenges of the pandemic has been knowing what advice to trust. There are several trusted sources of guidance, such as the government, scientific literature and the voluntary sector. Eastern Eye hosted a roundtable discussion of experts only last week and the South Asian Health Foundation (www.sahf.org.uk) has summarised a range of validated and useful resources for communities.
Although human beings are more similar than we are different, for some reason(s), BAME groups appear to have a more severe outcome that white Europeans from Covid-19 infection. While the inequality for BAME groups awaits further explanation, some issues necessitate immediate action.
First, there are behavioural factors. Let us understand how BAME populations might be more prone to contracting the Covid-19 infection. It spreads by direct contact or by a person being close to someone who is infected and breathing out the virus. It is well recognised that people from BAME groups, particularly those in deprived communities, tend to live with extended families and congregate for cultural and religious reasons.
There is therefore a greater risk of direct transmission in larger families or if people come into close contact with potentially infected individuals. The importance of social isolation for high-risk individuals – the elderly or those who have illnesses, putting them at increased risk, who have received letters from their doctors to shield from the external world – social distancing and higher standards of hygiene are concepts which may be difficult to achieve. Tailored messaging targeting vulnerable groups is essential.
Second, there are risk factors which make it more likely that once infected with the virus, outcomes may be worse. We know that patients with conditions such as diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity have a more severe disease course and are more likely to die from Covid-19 than patients without such conditions. Such conditions are more prevalent in BAME communities and quite often, are not as well controlled or managed.
It is therefore relevant not only for the present risk of Covid-19 but also for future health, that we encourage BAME patients to control their risk factors. Prevention strategies such as encouraging a healthy diet, undertaking physical activity and avoiding tobacco use are also key factors in reducing the risk of adverse outcome from Covid-19. For patients with conditions such as diabetes and blood pressure, good control is essential – they must ensure they take medication and have medical reviews if they are concerned. To tackle obesity, there has never a better time than now to start to eat sensibly and exercise more.
An important message to get across is that the NHS is open for business as usual, so patients must not sit on health concerns due to a fear of seeing their GP or going to hospital. One unfortunate consequence of the pandemic is that patients with significant illness have stayed away from hospitals or presented with a late stage of illness. We must ensure everyone receives the healthcare they need.
Third, we know that a high proportion of frontline NHS staff, bus drivers and other key workers are from a BAME background. Employers must ensure the risk of contracting Covid-19 is reduced for all staff and in particular, ensure BAME staff are supported to reduce the risk of infection. In the NHS and care sector, this means ensuring good access to appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) and a safe working environment.
In other forms of employment, similar measures to reduce the risk of exposure has been given to employers. This must apply to all businesses, including the Asian retail sector, where it is evident that social distancing unfortunately remains a challenge to implement. We must ensure a zero tolerance approach to ensure optimal protection for both staff and the public.
Finally, we must ensure an eagle eye is kept on emerging scientific hypotheses to avoid unintended morbidity and mortality in BAME groups. It is critically important to ensure that BAME populations are represented in clinical trials so we can be sure that all groups in society benefit from emerging vaccines and treatments.
As the world surfaces from the pandemic, things will get better. One hope is that for BAME groups, both self care and healthcare are better than in the past, so we can all enjoy a better life.
Professor Kiran CR Patel is also chair of trustees, South Asian Health Foundation.
US president Donald Trump gestures next to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport as Trump leaves Israel en route to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to attend a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a US-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Lod, Israel, October 13, 2025.
‘They make a desert and call it peace’, wrote the Roman historian Tacitus. That was an early exercise, back in AD 96, of trying to walk in somebody else’s shoes. The historian was himself the son-in-law of the Roman Governor of Britain, yet he here imagined the rousing speech of a Caledonian chieftain to give voice to the opposition to that imperial conquest.
Nearly two thousand years later, US president Donald Trump this week headed to Sharm-El-Sheikh in the desert, to join the Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators of the Gaza ceasefire. Twenty more world leaders, including prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and president Emmanuel Macron of France turned up too to witness this ceremonial declaration of peace in Gaza.
This ceasefire brings relief after two years of devastating pain. Tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. More of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas are returning dead than alive. Eighty-five per cent of Gaza is rubble. Each of the twenty steps of the proposed peace plan may prove rocky. The state of Palestine has more recognition - in principle - than ever before across the international community, but it may be a long road to that taking practical form. Israel continues to oppose a Palestinian state.
The ceasefire will be welcomed in Britain for humanitarian relief and rekindling hopes of a path to a political settlement. It offers an opportunity to take stock on the fissures of the last two years on community relations here in Britain too. That was the theme of a powerful cross-faith conversation last week, convened by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to reciprocate the expressions of solidarity received from Muslims, Christians and others after the Manchester synagogue attacks, and challenge the arson attack on a Sussex mosque.
Jewish and Muslim civic voices had convened an ‘optimistic alliance’ to keep conversations going when there seemed ever less to be optimistic about. The emerging news from Gaza was seen as a hopeful basis to deepen conversation in Britain about how tackling the causes of both antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice could form part of a shared commitment to cohesion.
This conflict has not seen a Brexit-style polarisation down the middle of British society. Most people’s first instinct was to avoid choosing a side in this conflict. The murderous Hamas attack on Jews on October 7, 2023 and the excesses of the Israeli assault on Gaza piled tragedy upon tragedy. The instinct to not take sides can be an expression of mutual empathy, but is not always so noble. It can reflect confusion and exhaustion with this seemingly intractable conflict. A tendency to look away and change the subject can frustrate those whose family heritage, faith solidarity or commitments to Zionism and Palestine as political ideas make them feel more closely connected.
Others have felt this conflict thrust upon them in an unwelcome way - including British Jews fed up with the antisemitic idea that they can be held responsible at school, university or work for what the government of Israel is doing. Protesters for Palestine perceive double standards in arguments about free speech - as do those with contrasting views. The proper boundaries between legitimate political protest and prejudice are sharply contested.
Hamit Coksun is an asylum seeker who speaks somewhat broken English. He would seem an unusual ally for Robert Jenrick. Yet the shadow justice secretary went to court to offer solidarity, after Coskun had burned a Qu’ran outside the Turkish Embassy, while shouting “F__ Islam” and “Islam is the religion of terrorism”. He had been fined £250, but the appeal court overturned his conviction. The judgment was context-specific: this specific incendiary protest took place outside an embassy, not a place of worship, in an empty street, and did not direct the comments at anybody in particular.
The law does not protect faiths from criticism, and indeed offers some protection for intolerant and prejudiced political speech too, though the police can place conditions on protest to protect people from abuse, intimidation or harassment on the basis of their faith.
So it can be legal to performatively burn books - holy or otherwise - though this verdict makes clear it does not offer a green light to do so in every context.
But how far should we celebrate those who choose to burn books? Cosun advocates banning the Qu’ran, making him a flawed champion of free speech. Jenrick is legitimately concerned to show that there are no laws against blasphemy in Britain, but could anybody imagine that he would turn up in person to show solidarity to a man burning the Bible, Bhagvad Gita or Torah, shouting profanities to declaring religion of war or genocide? The court’s defence of the right to shock, offend and provoke is correct in law. Those are hardly the only conversations that a shared society needs.
Sunder Katwalawww.easterneye.biz
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.