Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Pakistan cricketer Umar Akmal's 18-month ban reduced to one year

Pakistan cricketer Umar Akmal's 18-month ban over corruption charges has been reduced to a year, the Court of Arbitration for Sports said on Friday.

The verdict from the Lausanne-based body will likely come as a relief for the troubled batsman, who has a history of disciplinary issues that have earned him a string of fines and bans during his career.


But the court also hit him with a hefty fine of 4.2 million rupees ($26,854) over his breaching of the Anti-Corruption Code.

A Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) disciplinary committee banned Akmal for three years last April after he failed to report details of a match-fixing approach made to him during meetings with alleged bookies.

The ban was later reduced to 18 months by an independent adjudicator.

Pakistan cricket authorities hoping for a further reduction have filed an additional appeal over the case to the CAS.

"It's a big relief for Umar," the cricketer's brother Kamran told AFP.

"He wants to play cricket and return to the field."

The PCB said he would be eligible to compete again after completing a rehabilitation programme.

Addressing a press conference in Lahore, Akmal said he was ready to play again.

"I am fully ready and excited to play cricket again," he said. "It was tough being out and sitting at home with my bread and butter taken away.

"I don't want to comment on my national selection. It's my job to play cricket and perform and it's up to them (the selectors) - if they think it's better for the country [to include me], then they will definitely give a chance."

Akmal emerged on the international cricket scene with a hundred in his first Test in New Zealand in 2009.

He has so far played 16 Tests, 121 one-day internationals, as well as 84 Twenty20 internationals.

But his career has been plagued by disciplinary problems, including an arrest after scuffling with a traffic warden in 2014.

The batsman was also sent home after he failed a fitness test ahead of the 2017 Champions Trophy in England and has been hit with various fines over the years.

's 18-month ban over corruption charges has been reduced to a year, the Court of Arbitration for Sports said Friday.

The verdict from the Lausanne-based body will likely come as a relief for the troubled batsman, who has a history of disciplinary issues that have earned him a string of fines and bans during his career.

But the court also hit him with a hefty fine of 4.2 million rupees ($26,854) over his breaching of the Anti-Corruption Code.

A Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) disciplinary committee banned Akmal for three years last April after he failed to report details of a match-fixing approach made to him during meetings with alleged bookies.

The ban was later reduced to 18 months by an independent adjudicator.

Pakistan cricket authorities hoping for a further reduction have filed an additional appeal over the case to the CAS.

"It's a big relief for Umar," the cricketer's brother Kamran told AFP.

"He wants to play cricket and return to the field."

The PCB said he would be eligible to compete again after completing a rehabilitation programme.

Addressing a press conference in Lahore, Akmal said he was ready to play again.

"I am fully ready and excited to play cricket again," he said. "It was tough being out and sitting at home with my bread and butter taken away.

"I don't want to comment on my national selection. It's my job to play cricket and perform and it's up to them (the selectors) - if they think it's better for the country [to include me], then they will definitely give a chance."

Akmal emerged on the international cricket scene with a hundred in his first Test in New Zealand in 2009.

He has so far played 16 Tests, 121 one-day internationals, as well as 84 Twenty20 internationals.

But his career has been plagued by disciplinary problems, including an arrest after scuffling with a traffic warden in 2014.

The batsman was also sent home after he failed a fitness test ahead of the 2017 Champions Trophy in England and has been hit with various fines over the years.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less