THE author of a new book analysing the arguments against a controversial race report which denied institutional racism exists in the UK has revealed his motivations for delving into the debate.
Released earlier this year, the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities (Cred) report received a barrage of criticism from anti-racist campaigners and race equality think-tanks after its authors concluded racism no longer stopped ethnic minorities from progressing in society.
“Put simply, we no longer see a Britain where the system is deliberately rigged
against ethnic minorities,” Dr Tony Sewell, the commission’s chairman, said in a foreword to the report.
Hasan Ali Imam is the author of BAME, Breaking Through Barriers, a new book described as a “comprehensive response to the critics of the Cred report.”
It explores the arguments raised in the Cred report and offers a thorough critique on the issues at hand. Imam said he wanted to delve deeper into the anger of campaigners and understand why so many felt society had not progressed over the past six decades.
“I refuse to accept that we are perpetual slaves to white supremacy and victimisation,” the social commentator told Eastern Eye. “That is why I wanted to engage in dialogue and debate with these critics.”
The report’s point on racism no longer being the main factor to explain disparities should have been celebrated, Imam said. “This is what the civil rights campaigners fought for 60 years ago and, if nothing has changed, then it implies that the anti racist campaigners failed and the organisations and charities that exist to help empower ethnic communities have failed, too,” he said.
“They have not failed, and our communities are in a better place than 60 years ago. It is therefore very peculiar why this issue has angered anti-racist campaigners; it should not have provoked controversy,” he said.
However, Imam stressed his book was a basis for dialogue and understanding and his aim was to defuse the anger, rather than attack the critics. “I believe we can have a grown-up conversation between those who have different views,” he said.
'Race report is a challenge to white supremacy'
Imam believes many people missed a crucial point about the report. Some critics argued the report was not for BAME communities as it was tailored for white communities and that it supported white supremacy.
“I challenge this notion by stating that the report does the exact opposite,” he argued. “White supremacists would like to think they are in a superior and powerful position sitting on the peak of ‘mount privilege’. However, BAME communities are succeeding, and in some cases excelling white communities, in areas such as education.
“Hence, the key take-away for me is that the Cred report is a direct challenge to white supremacy – the critics have inverted this notion.”
On his own initial reaction to the report, Imam said he was struck by the claim that the UK is an example to other countries on what race relation should look like. He noted how Muslims in many parts of Europe were being targeted by far-right Islamophobia that had translated into actual government policies – such as banning halal meat and the headscarf or the niqab.
“I am very lucky to be living as a Muslim in the UK, I would never want to live in Europe,” he said. “When I look through the prism of my Bangladeshi-Muslim experience, I agree with the Cred report that in some cases, the UK is a beacon to Europe, and possibly, the world.
“The critics of Cred should not have been so quick to mock this claim.”
Analysing the criticism
Imam said the only way to make progress is through reasoned and civil debate. Telegraph columnist Calvin Robinson agreed Imam’s book highlights the “importance of reasoned debate and nuance”. “What is the worst thing that could happen? We just agree to disagree,” Imam said.
Prior to the release of the Cred analysis, Imam saw critics condemning the report before it was even released. The early criticism piqued his curiosity, he said.
“Why would critics make judgements on the report before they read it in its entirety? For me it was very unusual to watch this negative feedback so early on,” Imam explained.
He also took note of some of the racial abuse aimed at the commissioners, including Sewell. Imam witnessed Sewell being likened to a Nazi and the Klu Klux Klan (the white supremacist hate group).
“Something was very wrong in the discourse that was unfolding, and this motivated me to take an interest in the report and read through the entire 258 pages,” he said. “I wanted to understand why it caused a commotion. What was meant to be an article metamorphosed into a book. It is my own work and independent of the race commission.”
While conducting research for his book, Imam found that there were 16 areas of convergence between the Cred report and its critics. “These commonalities did not come out during the discussions I heard on TV and radio because the critics were too busy dismissing the report,” Imam remarked. “If the debate was reasoned, then progress would have been made in the discourse on ending ethnic disparities.
“The topic of closing the gaps within BAME communities is too important to be relegated to manufactured rage.”
How has the discussion on race changed?
In recent years, Imam believes the conversation on race has become amplified
and there is heightened awareness of racism and ethnic disparities. For instance, many corporations have accelerated their diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes.
He also regarded the surge of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement last year following the murder of George Floyd, a black man killed by a police officer in the United States.
Although he welcomed the new discourse on race, Imam voiced concern on the so-called cancel culture that has emerged in recent years. “The culture of cancelling divergent opinion in the media is a worrying development,” he said.
“Critical Race Theory (CRT) is the divisive mechanism at the centre of conversations in the US, and I believe this is making the US regress, not progress, by fracturing race relations. CRT assumes that white institutions and white communities are inherently racist and that any progress that BAME groups make are at the behest of white communities only. Hence, our communities have no tools nor capabilities to progress on our own.”
He highlighted the work of Robin DiAngelo, a white American academic whom Imam described as the “doyen of white self-deprecation”. DiAngelo, author of White Fragility, is known for her work in the field of whiteness studies and holds workshops on the topic.
According to Imam, her workshops tend to focus on white progressive audiences “where their default status is that of a racist and that whiteness is a shameful state of being that needs to be shed”.
“Well-meaning white anti-racist academics like DiAngelo are steering the conversations on racism towards a dystopia based on CRT, which replaces common human experiences with robust racial fault lines,” warned Imam.
On his own experiences with racial discrimination, Imam said he faced racial abuse when he was growing up in the 1980s. He has also experienced Islamophobia – which intensified following terror attacks.
Imam witnessed the scale of racial disparity while running for parliament in 2010. He campaigned in parts of east London with a high Bangladeshi population and was pained to see the number of Bengali families living in social housing.
However, two decades later, Imam believes the disparities are closing. “I see more prosperity among the Bangladeshi community,” said Imam, who was born in Bangladesh. “There are more millionaires now, which was unheard of 30 years ago and Bangladeshi children are starting to do well in education and entering good professions, as well as becoming entrepreneurs.
“We are on an upward trajectory towards success and new memories are being created on the way.”
BAME, Breaking Through Barriers by Hasan Ali Imam is available on Amazon
A CONVICTED child sex offender from Pakistan has successfully challenged government attempts to send him back to his homeland, claiming he faces danger because his criminal acts became public there.
Jamil Ahmed, 48, persuaded immigration judges that deporting him would breach his human rights after newspapers in Pakistan reportedly covered his convictions for abusing teenage girls in Scotland, reported The Times.
The case highlighted ongoing legal complexities surrounding the removal of foreign nationals who have committed serious crimes in Britain.
Ahmed first faced justice in 2008 when courts found him guilty of unlawful sexual activity with a girl aged between 13 and 16. He received a three-year probation order and was ordered to complete 240 hours of unpaid work.
Five years later, he appeared in court again on similar charges involving another teenager. This time, magistrates sentenced him to three years and six months in prison and placed him permanently on the sex offenders register.
Following his second conviction, immigration officials issued a deportation order. However, Ahmed has spent nearly ten years fighting through the courts to remain in Britain, losing two previous appeals but never actually being removed.
At his latest tribunal hearing in Edinburgh, Ahmed's representatives argued that media coverage of his crimes had reached Pakistan through various publications, including the Daily Kashmir News.
The tribunal judgment said, "Ahmed asserts that he has a well-founded fear of persecution and is at risk of suffering serious harm in Pakistan because knowledge of his crimes have become known in Pakistan and published in newspapers."
He further claimed that local authorities in Pakistan had opened an investigation based on his convictions, and that religious leaders had issued a fatwa against him. He alleged that extremists were distributing leaflets containing his photograph and that armed men had visited his family home searching for him. Tragically, he said his father was subsequently shot dead.
The Home Office challenged the authenticity of the alleged Pakistani newspaper reports during proceedings.
Ahmed called Pakistani legal expert Asad Ali Khan to testify about the newspaper coverage, but the 2024 hearing judge dismissed this evidence, leading to Ahmed's initial defeat.
However, the Upper Tribunal ruled that the previous judge had made legal errors by failing to properly consider the expert testimony and other key evidence.
Judge Jeremy Rintoul concluded, "I consider that, cumulatively, the judge has failed to reach sustainable conclusions with respect to the documents, the wife's evidence and the expert's opinion."
Ahmed, who is married with children and continues living in Scotland, will now face a fresh hearing to determine his immigration status, the newspaper report added.
Bertrice Pompe (CL) and Bernadette Dugasse (CR), who were both born on Diego Garcia, speak outside High Court following their campaign's failed bid to prevent Britain transferring ownership of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, on May 22, 2025 in London.
A BRITISH court on Thursday cleared the way for the government to proceed with a deal to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, lifting a temporary injunction that had blocked the signing of the agreement.
The deal would involve the UK transferring the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius and paying to lease the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island in the territory.
Prime minister Keir Starmer was scheduled to finalise the agreement in a virtual signing ceremony with Mauritian representatives on Thursday. However, a last-minute injunction granted to two Chagossian women by London's High Court delayed the process.
The injunction, granted early Thursday morning, temporarily blocked the deal, leading to criticism of the government. At a 10:30am hearing, Judge Martin Chamberlain lifted the ban, stating that extending it could harm the UK’s national and public interest. He added that any further legal challenges must be brought before the Court of Appeal.
“We welcome the judge's ruling today,” a government spokesperson said.
The opposition Conservatives criticised the proposed agreement. “You’re seeing British sovereign territory being given away to an ally of China, and billions of pounds of British taxpayers’ money being spent for the privilege,” said Conservative MP Robert Jenrick. “This was always a bad deal,” he added.
Earlier, the two Chagossian women, Bernadette Dugasse and Bertrice Pompe, had sought the injunction after a leaked newspaper report on Wednesday night indicated that the deal was set to be announced.
Outside the court, about 50 protesters gathered. The women's lawyer, Philip Rule, said the government was acting “unlawfully” and argued that Thursday could be the court’s last chance to intervene.
Starmer has said Britain’s ownership of the Chagos Islands has been questioned by international legal rulings and that an agreement with Mauritius is the only way to ensure the base remains operational.
The base on Diego Garcia is leased to the United States and is considered a key military facility in the Asia-Pacific, having been used during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ahead of the court’s ruling, a government spokesperson told AFP, “The deal is the right thing to protect the British people and our national security.”
The Conservative Party called the agreement a “sellout for British interests”.
Britain retained the Chagos Islands after Mauritius became independent in the 1960s. Thousands of Chagossian residents were later removed from the islands and have pursued legal claims for compensation.
In 2019, the International Court of Justice recommended that the UK return the islands to Mauritius following decades of legal disputes.
Under the proposed deal, the UK would obtain a 99-year lease for the base, with the option to renew. The government has not disclosed the cost but has not denied reports of a £90 million annual fee.
Mauritian prime minister Navin Ramgoolam has said Mauritius would continue to pursue full sovereignty over the islands if the United States did not support the agreement.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Salal Dam on the Chenab, the first hydropower project under the Indus Water Treaty
INDIA is considering plans to dramatically increase the amount of water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action for the deadly April attack on tourists that New Delhi blames on Islamabad, according to four people familiar with the matter.
Delhi “put in abeyance” its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, which governs the use of the Indus river system, shortly after 26 civilians were killed in Indian Kashmir in what India described as an act of terror. Pakistan has denied any involvement, but the accord has not been revived, despite both countries agreeing to a ceasefire last week.
After suspending India’s participation in the treaty, India’s prime minister Narendra Modi ordered officials to expedite planning and execution of projects on the Chenab, Jhelum and Indus rivers, three bodies of water in the Indus system that are designated primarily for Pakistan’s use, six people told Reuters.
One of the key plans under discussion involves doubling the length of the Ranbir canal on the Chenab to 120 km, according to two of the sources. The canal, which runs through India to Pakistan’s agricultural heartland of Punjab, was built in the 19th century, long before the treaty was signed.
India is permitted to draw a limited amount of water from the Chenab for irrigation, but an expanded canal – which experts said could take years to construct – would allow it to divert 150 cubic meters of water per second, up from about 40 cubic meters currently, the four people said, citing official discussions and documents they had seen.
Details of the Indian government’s deliberations on expanding Ranbir have not previously been reported. The discussions started last month and continue even after the ceasefire, one of the people said.
The Indian ministries responsible for water and foreign affairs, as well as Modi’s office, did not respond to Reuters’ questions. Indian hydropower giant NHPC, which operates many projects in the Indus system, also did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Modi said in a fiery speech this week that “water and blood cannot flow together,” though he didn’t refer to the treaty. Water minister CR Paatil told a media event last Friday (16) that his ministry would “implement what prime minister Modi says” and “try to ensure that not a drop of water goes out.”
The water and foreign ministries of Pakistan did not respond to requests for comment. Foreign minister Ishaq Dar told lawmakers last week that the government had written to India arguing that suspending the treaty was unlawful and that Islamabad regarded it as remaining in force.
A dry stretch of the Indus River in Pakistan’s Jamshoro and Kotri districts earlier this month
Islamabad said after India suspended the treaty in April that it considered “any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan” to be an “act of war.” About 80 per cent of Pakistani farms depend on the Indus system, as do nearly all hydropower projects serving the country of some 250 million.
Any efforts by Delhi to build dams, canals or other infrastructure that would withhold or divert significant amount of flow from the Indus system to India “would take years to realize,” said water security expert David Michel of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
International relations expert Happymon Jacob at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University said that India’s new focus on the Indus Waters Treaty reflected an attempt to pressure Pakistan over Kashmir.
“With the latest conflict, Delhi may refuse to discuss Kashmir with Pakistan in any format,” he said. “Delhi has not only progressively narrowed the scope of bilateral talks but has also curtailed the agenda, focusing only on specific issues like the IWT.”
Pakistan said it is preparing legal action in several international forums, including the World Bank, which facilitated the treaty, as well as the Permanent Court of Arbitration or the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
“Water should not be weaponised,” Pakistan’s finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told Reuters on Monday. “We don’t even want to consider any scenario which... does not take into account the reinstatement of this treaty.”
The Indus system runs through some of the world’s most geopolitically tense areas, originating near Lake Mansarovar in Tibet and snaking through India’s north and Pakistan’s east and southeast, before emptying into the Arabian Sea.
The treaty is widely seen as one of the world’s most successful water-sharing accords, having survived several major wars and longstanding tensions between India and Pakistan.
Islamabad has previously opposed many Indian projects in the Indus system, while Delhi said after the Kashmir attack that it had been trying to renegotiate the treaty since 2023 to account for population increases and its rising need for clean hydroenergy.
The treaty restricts India largely to setting up low-impact hydropower projects on the three rivers allocated to Pakistan. Delhi has freedom to utilise the waters of three other rivers – the Sutlej, Beas and Ravi tributaries – as it sees fit.
Delhi has also created a list of hydropower projects in its Jammu and Kashmir territory that it hopes will expand capacity to 12,000 megawatts, up from the current 3,360 MW.
The list, which was created by the power ministry and seen by Reuters, was not dated. A person familiar with the document said it was created before the Kashmir incident but is actively being discussed by government officials.
The prospective projects also include dams that can store large volumes of water, in what would be a first for India in the Indus river system, according to two people familiar with the matter. India has identified at least five possible storage projects, four of which are on tributaries of the Chenab and Jhelum, according to the power ministry document. (Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, expressed his fury after witnessing a major accident during the launch of the latest North Korean warship, on Thursday. Kim considers this malfunction in the mechanism of the warship as a shame to the nation’s prestige.
As per Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), parts of the 5,000 ton destroyer’s bottom was damaged, and went off-balance as it eased into water during the launch. Parts of the destroyer’s hull was crushed, leaving the bow stranded on the shipway.
No casualties or injuries were reported after the incident.
The mishap took place in Kim’s presence, along with a large crowd from northeastern part of Chongjin, which added to his humiliation. He commented the accident as “criminal act”, and “carelessness”, from those in charge. He declared that those involved with the error will be held responsible and punished.
Multiple state institutions are considered responsible the accident – including the Munitions Industry Department, Kim Chaek University of Technology and the central ship design bureau.
Yang Wuk, an Asan Institute for Policy Studies military expert commented on the failed launch of the warship, embarrassing for the country.
According to a South Korean military analysis, the damaged warship is on their side in the water. The South Korean military spokesperson, Lee said that he expected the damaged destroyer to be equipped like the Choe Hyon.
“If the ship does not move together, the stresses will tear the hull apart,” said Sal Mercogliano, Professor at Campbell University and a maritime expert.
North Korea lacks floating docks usually found in shipbuilding states. Therefore, "Pushing from the side is the most basic, simplest and cheapest, if done right,” said Chol Il, retired South Korean submarine commander.
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces. Therefore, he ordered for the destroyer to be restored before the late June plenary session of the ruling Worker’s Party.
Keep ReadingShow less
The recall also sheds light on the ongoing debate around raw milk consumption
A milk product sold in Northern Ireland has been urgently recalled due to fears of contamination with a potentially deadly strain of E. coli bacteria. Kenneth Hanna's Farm Shop has issued a recall for its Ken's Raw Jersey Milk following the possible detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), a dangerous form of the bacteria.
The recall applies to all batch codes and use-by dates of the two-litre bottles sold in Northern Ireland. Consumers have been advised not to consume the product. Instead, the milk should either be returned to the place of purchase or safely disposed of.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has issued a public health warning, stating: “The possible presence of STEC in this product. Symptoms caused by STEC organisms include severe diarrhoea (including bloody diarrhoea), abdominal pain, and sometimes haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), a serious condition that can lead to kidney failure and can be fatal.”
STEC is a specific strain of E. coli that produces Shiga toxins, which are capable of causing serious illness. One of the most recognised strains is E. coli O157:H7, commonly linked to foodborne outbreaks associated with undercooked meat, unwashed produce, and unpasteurised dairy products.
Symptoms of an STEC infection typically develop within three to four days of exposure but can appear anytime between one and ten days. They include stomach cramps, diarrhoea—often bloody—and in some cases, fever. These symptoms may last for up to two weeks. While many recover without complications, the infection can result in severe outcomes in certain individuals.
One of the most serious complications is haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), which affects approximately 5 to 10 percent of STEC cases. HUS primarily impacts young children and the elderly, and symptoms include reduced urination, pale skin, fatigue, swelling, and unexplained bruising. In severe cases, the condition can lead to kidney failure and, in rare instances, death.
The FSA has advised anyone experiencing these symptoms to stay at home and avoid attending work, school, or nursery until they have been symptom-free for at least 48 hours to minimise the risk of spreading the infection.
The recall also sheds light on the ongoing debate around raw milk consumption. Ken's Raw Jersey Milk is an unpasteurised product, meaning it has not undergone the heat treatment process used to eliminate harmful bacteria. While supporters of raw milk claim it offers health benefits such as improved digestion and a richer nutrient profile, health authorities continue to warn of the risks associated with its consumption.
Raw milk can carry pathogens including E. coli, STEC, Listeria, and Salmonella. These bacteria are typically destroyed during pasteurisation, a process not applied to raw milk products.
This incident serves as a reminder of the potential dangers of consuming unpasteurised dairy. The FSA continues to monitor the situation, and consumers in Northern Ireland are urged to heed the recall notice and take appropriate safety precautions.
For further updates or health advice, consumers are encouraged to consult the FSA’s official website or contact their healthcare provider if symptoms appear.