Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

National Portrait Gallery withdraws video after Churchill Bengal famine row

The 40-minute work, Persistence, by Turner Prize-winning artist Helen Cammock described the famine as involving the "wilful starvation of the Indian population by Winston Churchill".

Churchill

Sir Winston Churchill making the victory sign, circa 1950.

OFF/AFP via Getty Images


A VIDEO installation at the National Portrait Gallery has been withdrawn following a dispute over its references to Sir Winston Churchill's role in the 1943 Bengal famine.


The 40-minute work, Persistence, by Turner Prize-winning artist Helen Cammock described the famine as involving the "wilful starvation of the Indian population by Winston Churchill".

The installation had been on temporary display for 10 months and was due to end in August as part of the exhibition Artists First: Contemporary Perspectives on Portraiture.

The work prompted an open letter from Lord Roberts of Belgravia, a Churchill biographer, signed by more than 50 peers, including Churchill's grandson Sir Nicholas Soames. The letter said the claim was incorrect and described the installation as an "ideologically motivated rant", the BBC reported.

An estimated three million people died in the Bengal famine. Lord Roberts said the famine was caused by a typhoon and that Churchill instructed his war cabinet to make every effort to help those affected by seeking grain from international leaders. Others argue Churchill's policies contributed to the famine.

The National Portrait Gallery told the BBC that Cammock had decided to remove the film from display. It said the work was presented as an artistic piece, not a documentary, and that the views expressed did not necessarily reflect those of the gallery.

Cammock said the work was not a documentary and urged people to "hear it out". She said her work was grounded in academia and "asks us to think about who is honoured and valorised and who is not; whose stories are told and whose are not".

She added: "Nina Simone once said 'An artist's duty, as far as I'm concerned, is to reflect the times' and sometimes this means revisiting, enquiry and challenge."

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Social media child protection

Ofcom says social media platforms must do more to protect children from harmful content, including material pushed through personalised feeds

iStock

Ofcom raises concerns over social media algorithms as child safety rules show little impact

Highlights

  • Ofcom found no significant change in the proportion of children encountering harmful content in the first nine months after new safety duties took effect in July 2025.
  • Personalised recommendation feeds remain a major route through which children encounter pornography, suicide-related material and misogynistic content.
  • Campaigners say stronger enforcement is needed, warning that a proposed social media ban for under-16s cannot replace existing online safety protections.

Ofcom has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the UK’s online safety rules after finding that children’s exposure to harmful social media content remained largely unchanged during the first nine months of the new requirements.

Keep ReadingShow less