MUZMATCH, a leading Muslim dating and marriage app, has lost a long legal battle to keep its name. A court in the UK has ruled that the start-up had infringed on the trademark of multibillion-dollar company, Match Group, which claims to have “pioneered the concept of online dating” more than 20 years ago.
The US dating giant behind Tinder and OkCupid won the court battle against Muzmatch after accusing it of copying its product and services. Lawyers for Match Group, which owns Tinder and Hinge as well as Match.com, accused Muzmatch at a court hearing in January of “free riding” on its reputation in order to become a major player in the online dating market.
Match Group has been at odds with Muzmatch for some time now, having successfully challenged Muzmatch’s trademark registrations in the EU and the U.K. since 2016. The group had also made several attempts to buy the Muslim dating app between 2017 and 2019, Muzmatch’s lawyers said at the January hearing.
In his judgment, the deputy high court judge Nicholas Caddick QC stated that this “would have led some consumers to assume that the goods and services offered by Muzmatch were somehow connected with or derived from Match”. According to the American company, the British firm (Muzmatch) also used keyword tags including “match-muslim” and “uk-muslim-match”, which it claimed were an attempt to “ride on the coattails” of Match’s registered trademarks.
Muzmatch’s chief executive, Shahzad Younas, said he would appeal against the judgment but vowed to continue the platform, even if it meant rebranding. Younas, 37, a former Morgan Stanley banker who launched Muzmatch in 2011 with the aim of providing a safe environment for single Muslims to meet online, added that he had spent $1m fighting Match Group in court in the UK and the US.
He added: “The number of Muslims in the community, Muslim organisations, and individuals, businesses, etc, who’ve said: ‘I’m so glad that you’re fighting this and you didn’t back down’ … For them, there was a principle at stake. In their eyes, and we’ve heard this from customers as well, it’s so important that a Muslim-led startup creates products for the community.”
Muzmatch states that “the judge did mention that he didn’t believe we were intentionally using Match Group’s brand to our advantage, but this was little consolation. It’s a disappointing result, but we’re most worried about the chilling effect this has in the tech industry. What does it say when a multi-billion dollar company can use its weight to stifle competition in this manner?”
Muzmatch may have lost the case but Younas has not given up. He says, “Whilst we respect the judgement, we wholeheartedly disagree with this ruling and intend to appeal. This fight isn’t over! I have truly been touched by the love and solidarity I’ve received from the global Muslim community who recognise the very real contribution we’re making. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.”
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
NMC founder BR Shetty found liable in $5.4bn fraud case
Nov 11, 2026
Highlights
- Abu Dhabi court finds BR Shetty and former NMC chief executive Prasanth Manghat liable for fraud.
- The case involves a $5.4bn (£4.1bn) claim linked to NMC's collapse.
- Judge finds Shetty knowingly received improperly transferred funds and helped conceal company debts.
- NMC's administrators say the ruling supports their efforts to recover money for creditors.
AN ABU DHABI court has found Indian businessman Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty (BR Shetty), founder of collapsed healthcare group NMC Health, and its former chief executive Prasanth Manghat liable for knowingly participating in fraud involving billions of dollars.
The ruling follows a $5.4 billion (£4.1bn) claim brought by Alvarez & Marsal, the administrators of the former FTSE 100 company, in a long-running case linked to one of London's biggest corporate scandals.
According to The Times, the Abu Dhabi Global Market court found that Shetty and Manghat had "dishonestly and knowingly participated in the fraud" and held them liable for fraudulent and wrongful trading.
The judgment was delivered after a trial that began in March.
Justice Sir Andrew Smith found that Shetty had knowingly received "substantial sums improperly transferred" from NMC Group and used the money to acquire assets.
He was also found to have failed to disclose securities supporting his personal financial arrangements, allowed misleading financial statements to be published and helped conceal the group's borrowings from its former external auditor, Ernst & Young (EY).
The court ruled that both men must contribute to NMC's assets for wrongful trading. For fraudulent trading, $5.4bn (£4.1bn) was identified as the starting point for deciding the appropriate contributions, according to the judgment summary.
The precise amounts each defendant must pay were not specified in the report.
NMC collapse and investigation
Alvarez & Marsal was appointed administrator in 2020 after NMC was plunged into crisis following allegations of accounting and governance irregularities raised by US short-seller Muddy Waters Research.
An investigation by the Freeh Group, commissioned by NMC, subsequently uncovered $6.6bn (£5bn) in debt.
Founded by Shetty, NMC operated in 19 countries, including the UK, where it owned Aspen Healthcare. At its peak in 2018, the company had a market value of £8.6bn on the London Stock Exchange.
Its collapse caused heavy losses for investors and creditors, including Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank (ADCB).
The court also found that ADCB had established its claims under UAE law against Manghat, including claims for outstanding liabilities and lost profits.
The bank's fraud claim against the former chief executive was heard alongside the administrators' case.
In February, Alvarez & Marsal reached a confidential settlement with EY following a separate £2bn claim at the High Court in London.
The administrators also reached a confidential $600m (£455m) settlement in July with Bank of Baroda, one of India's largest banks, which had been a defendant in the Abu Dhabi proceedings.
Shetty and Manghat consider appeal
Both Shetty and Manghat had denied the allegations.
A spokesman for Shetty, 84, said he was "surprised and disappointed" by the judgment and was considering an appeal.
"Dr Shetty has always maintained that he was not party to the fraud at NMC," the spokesman said.
Manghat's spokesman also said he was considering possible avenues for appeal. He maintained that the two cases brought against him were "disproportionate", both in their scale and in the way they singled him out.
Shetty has previously described himself as the "victim of a large-scale fraud" and denied responsibility for the company's collapse.
Richard Fleming, joint administrator and managing director at Alvarez & Marsal, said the judgment vindicated the efforts made since the firm's appointment.
NMC's operating companies in the UAE exited administration in 2022.
Keep ReadingShow less











