Minneapolis Public Schools defends policy to sack white teachers first
It says the policy is aimed at remedying “the continuing effects of past discrimination”.
Representative image (iStock)
Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) has stood by its policy of prioritising the retention of educators of underrepresented backgrounds while determining layoffs, saying aimed at remedying “the continuing effects of past discrimination”.
The American public school district’s agreement with the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) stipulates that teachers belonging to “populations underrepresented among licensed teachers in the district” may be exempt from district-wide layoffs outside of seniority order.
It is a deviation from the traditional “last-in, first-out” system.
A Minneapolis Public Schools spokesperson told ABC News, “To remedy the continuing effects of past discrimination, Minneapolis Public Schools and the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) mutually agreed to contract language that aims to support the recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups as compared to the labour market and to the community served by the school district.”
The prioritisation policy follows the introduction of the Increase Teachers of Colour Act which seeks to “increase the percentage of teachers of colour and American Indian teachers in Minnesota”.
The objective of the legislation is to ensure that “all students have equitable access to effective and racially and ethnically diverse teachers who reflect the diversity of students”.
However, the policy of the school district raised the concerns that attempts to rectify past discrimination could constitute discrimination itself.
Critics feel that layoffs should be based on merit, not seniority or race.
Earlier, a memorandum of agreement between MPS and the American Indian Community of Minneapolis, represented by the Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors recognised that the education of American Indian children continued to present significant challenges to the school district due to the disconnect between American Indian cultural values and practices and western paradigms of education.
It also recognised that the wisdom and insights of American Indian educators and other American Indian community members were required to assist the district in meeting its educational responsibilities to American Indian students.