Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Manoj Bajpayee’s ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ controversy explained: Why Neeraj Pandey’s Netflix series is under fire

Objections were raised both online and through formal complaints

Manoj Bajpayee

The controversy centres on the title Ghooskhor Pandat

X/ RajneetiTadka

Highlights

  • Objections raised over the title of Neeraj Pandey’s upcoming Netflix drama Ghooskhor Pandat

  • FIR filed in Lucknow alleging the title hurts religious sentiments
  • Manoj Bajpayee and Neeraj Pandey issue clarifications amid growing backlash

What sparked the controversy

The controversy centres on the title Ghooskhor Pandat, with several groups claiming the use of the word “Pandat” is offensive when paired with “Ghooskhor”. Critics argue that the term is traditionally linked to priests and the Brahmin community, and that its usage in the title amounts to a disrespectful portrayal.

Objections were raised both online and through formal complaints, with some organisations warning of protests unless the title was changed.


FIR filed in Lucknow

Following the complaints, an FIR was registered at the Hazratganj police station in Lucknow against the director and the makers of the series. The complaint alleges that the title hurts religious sentiments and promotes a negative image of a particular community.

The filing of the FIR escalated the issue and brought the series into the spotlight ahead of its release.

Makers respond to backlash

Director Neeraj Pandey addressed the criticism by clarifying that “Pandat” has been used only as a reference for a fictional character and is not linked to any caste, religion or community. He also apologised to those who felt hurt by the title.

In response to public sentiment, the makers took down promotional material related to the series.

Manoj Bajpayee’s statement

Lead actor Manoj Bajpayee said he respects the concerns raised by those who were offended. He emphasised that his role focuses on portraying a flawed individual and the character’s journey, and was not intended as commentary on any community.

Bajpayee also spoke about Neeraj Pandey’s approach to filmmaking, saying the director works with seriousness and care, and that the team’s response reflects their respect for public sentiment.

What happens next

While the makers have clarified their intent, the FIR remains in place and reactions continue to emerge. There has been no official update yet on whether the controversy will affect the show’s release plans.

More For You

James Bond: Eon's rival studio passed on Ian Fleming novels calling them 'ridiculous' and 'not movie material'

The decision later became one of film history’s biggest missed opportunities

Getty Images

James Bond: Eon's rival studio passed on Ian Fleming novels calling them 'ridiculous' and 'not movie material'

Highlights

  • Newly surfaced studio reports reveal Bond novels were once rejected for the big screen
  • Elstree Studios dismissed Ian Fleming’s stories as unrealistic and unsuitable for cinema
  • Thunderball and Dr No received criticism over implausible plots and heavy gadget use
  • The decision later became one of film history’s biggest missed opportunities

Before Bond became a billion-pound franchise, one studio wanted no part of it

Years before Eon Productions transformed James Bond into one of cinema’s most successful franchises, a rival studio reportedly saw little value in Ian Fleming’s spy stories. Newly unearthed internal reports reveal that Elstree Studios rejected the opportunity to adapt the Bond novels after deciding they were “not movie material” and unlikely to succeed on screen.

The assessments came from the studio’s readers department in the late 1950s, where books and scripts were examined for adaptation potential. Instead of seeing a future blockbuster series, reviewers questioned whether Bond’s adventures would appeal to audiences.

Keep ReadingShow less