Lord Austin ‘surprised’ by troubles in Leicester last year
Inquiry lead denies authorities overlooked ‘deepening divides’ in community
By Sarwar AlamSep 20, 2023
THE lead of an independent review investigating into clashes in Leicester last year has refuted suggestions that the authorities overlooked decades of deepening divides in the city.
Dozens of people were arrested after community tensions erupted in August and September 2022 and led incidents of vandalism and attacks on places of worship and other properties in Leicester, bringing to the fore divisions in the city and beyond.
Lord Ian Austin, who was appointed by the levelling up and communities secretary Michael Gove to lead the independent review, told Eastern Eye he was ‘surprised’ by the troubles in Leicester.
“Leicester’s got a proud history of diversity, tolerance and communication. I have visited Leicester on quite a few occasions; I’ve also worked in Leicester for a few months. What struck me is its diversity, it’s strength of community relations,” he said.
“Leicester is an amazing city. People from all over the world have contributed to work together from all sorts of different places and backgrounds to contribute to its success. And that’s why I was so surprised to see what happened last year.”
The panel will consist of Dr Samir Shah CBE, a former commissioner for the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities; Hilary Pilkington, professor of sociology at the University of Manchester and Dr Shaaz Mahboob, head of digital development NHS England. The panel will aim to establish the facts of what happened during the period of unrest, analyse it, share recommendations to prevent it happening again and suggest ways to strengthen cohesion locally.
Dr Samir Shah
Lord Austin said, “We’re coming into this with a completely open mind, no preconceptions, no preconceived ideas. “We’ve got a really great panel. It’s diverse, it’s independent from the government, independent from the council. It brings together people with real expertise who have spent decades working on these sorts of issues.” Lord Austin said he was keen to put local people at the forefront of the independent inquiry. “We want to listen to people in Leicester to understand last year’s events, what can be learned from them and how
communities in the city can work together to prevent problems in future,” he added.
“If people want their views taken into account, come and talk to me or invite me to come and listen to you. The key thing is that local people are in the lead of this.”
Dilwar Hussain, founder and chair of New Horizons in British Islam, a charity that works on Muslim identity, integration and reform, told Eastern Eye in July that his organisation had worked with Leicester Council for 15 years and warned them of ‘cracks in social cohesion’ and told them to get on top of the issues.
Asked if he would be willing to speak to some of the people who instigated or took part in the violence and listen to the reasons for their actions, Lord Austin admitted that would be “difficult”.
“We want to talk to people in different communities. We’re not just coming here to talk to the council, to the police or these sorts of institutions,” he said. “We’re coming to listen to local people, but if people were involved in criminality, then I think that might be difficult.”
This is the second attempt at understanding the circumstances that led to the unrest in Leicester.
In November last year, Leicester City Mayor, Sir Peter Soulsby, announced an inquiry that would be led by Dr Chris Allen, an associate professor of hate crimes at the University of Leicester (UoL), working alongside a team of researchers and an advisory panel.
Allen, however, stepped down after his appointment was criticised by local councillors and a number of local Hindu organisations who claimed his previous research on Muslim communities and Islamophobia might not make him an impartial voice.
Lord Austin has faced similar accusations of potentially lacking impartiality.
Hilary Pilkington
He has been accused of Islamophobia from The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) who referenced his 2021 tweet showing a fake new flavour for Ben and Jerry’s ice cream for people in Gaza, named “Hamas Terror Misu” after the company announced that it would stop selling its products in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The MCB said in a statement that Lord Austin’s appointment had created “deep apprehension among Muslims and other communities in Leicester”.
Lord Austin was the Labour MP for Dudley North from 2005 until 2019, sitting as an independent for his last nine months as MP after resigning from the party due to what he claimed was a “culture of extremism, anti-semitism and intolerance”.
“I’ve spent my entire life working against racism, prejudice and extremism,” he said.
“I spent my entire time in politics, and before that, trying to bring people together, build stronger and more united communities. I understand that we’ve got to come to Leicester, we’ve got to earn people’s confidence and trust and that’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to listen to everybody, and we’re going to try and make some of the recommendations for the future. I’m sure there’ll be things we learn that can be applied to other communities.”
The panel is expected to publish the findings of the review next year.
Dr Shaaz Mahboob
A second, separately-run inquiry into the unrest is being hosted by the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London.
Leicester Mayor Sir Soulsby claimed that neither of the two inquiries will be seen as being “truly impartial”. “I myself would not pretend to have the impartiality of a judge or lawyer. The only worry I have is neither of the two approaches will be seen as being truly impartial. I hope they can demonstrate they are taking the right measures and an impartial view and that we can learn something from them,” he said.
A three-vehicle collision on Tavistock Road in Plymouth led to significant traffic disruption on Thursday, May 15.
The crash occurred at around 11:00 BST and prompted an immediate response from Devon and Cornwall Police, the fire service, and paramedics. Emergency services attended the scene to manage the incident and assess those involved.
According to a witness, it appeared that one vehicle had collided with the rear of another. Photographs from the scene showed emergency crews present amid long queues of traffic.
The collision resulted in the closure of all southbound lanes on Tavistock Road between William Prance Road and Manadon Roundabout, causing substantial delays for motorists. The roads and traffic monitoring service Inrix reported the incident at 11:27 BST, confirming slow traffic and lane closures in the affected area.
— (@)
Police stated that investigations into the cause of the crash are ongoing. The road remained closed for several hours to allow emergency services to clear the scene safely.
By 14:30 BST, Tavistock Road was reopened to traffic. No further details have been released regarding any injuries sustained or the circumstances leading up to the crash.
Drivers were advised to follow local traffic updates and seek alternative routes during the closure.
THE Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured confiscation orders totalling £305,284 from Raheel Mirza, Cameron Vickers and Opeyemi Solaja for their roles in an investment fraud. The orders cover all their remaining assets.
The confiscation proceedings against a fourth defendant, Reuben Akpojaro, have been adjourned.
The FCA said the money will be returned to investors as soon as possible. Failure to pay could lead to imprisonment.
Between June 2016 and January 2020, the defendants cold-called individuals and persuaded them to invest in a shell company.
They claimed to trade client money in binary options, but the funds were used to fund their lifestyles.
In 2023, the four were convicted and sentenced to a combined 24 and a half years.
Steve Smart, executive director, Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said: “We are committed to fighting financial crime, including denying criminals their ill-gotten gains. We’ve already successfully prosecuted these individuals for their part in a scam that conned 120 people out of their money. We’re now seeking to recover as much as we can for victims.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said at a Downing Street press conference that the changes were necessary as male prisons in England and Wales are expected to run out of space by November.
THOUSANDS of criminals, including domestic abusers and sexual offenders recalled to prison for breaching licence conditions, will be released after 28 days under new emergency measures to manage the prison capacity crisis.
Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said at a Downing Street press conference that the changes were necessary as male prisons in England and Wales are expected to run out of space by November. “That would lead to a total breakdown of law and order,” she said.
The policy applies to offenders originally sentenced to between one and four years. Terrorists and those assessed by the police, prison and probation services as high risk or those who have committed serious further offences will be excluded, The Times reported.
Mahmood said the change “buys us the time we need to introduce the sentencing that — alongside our record prison building plans — will end the crisis in our prisons for good.”
According to The Times, the number of prison spaces has dropped below 500, with jails operating at 99 per cent capacity. The Ministry of Justice said those being recalled for minor infractions, such as missing appointments or failing to notify changes in circumstances, are clogging up the system. Currently, 13,583 people — 15 per cent of the prison population — are in jail after recall, up from 100 in 1993.
Victims commissioner Baroness Newlove told The Times: “Victims will understandably feel unnerved and bewildered… reducing time served on recall can only place victims and the wider public at an unnecessary risk of harm.”
Domestic abuse commissioner Dame Nicole Jacobs said: “You are not sent to prison for four years if you do not pose significant danger… Re-releasing them back into the community after 28 days is simply unacceptable.”
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said Labour was “siding with criminals over the public” and should instead focus on the 17,000 people on remand and deporting the 10,350 foreign criminals in UK prisons.
Amy Rees, interim permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice, said failure to enact the measures would be “intolerable” and could force courts to release dangerous offenders on bail due to lack of space.
The policy is expected to create 1,400 places and remain in place until the government’s wider sentencing reforms begin next spring. Construction on three new prisons will begin this year, adding 5,000 places, but the government still faces a projected shortfall of 9,500 by 2028.
Keep ReadingShow less
They traced its likely path through a prominent landowning family
A document long believed to be a mere copy of Magna Carta has been identified as a rare original dating back to 1300, making it one of the most valuable historical manuscripts in existence, according to British academics.
The discovery was made after researchers in the UK examined digitised images of the document, which has been held in Harvard Law School’s library since 1946. At the time, the manuscript was purchased for just $27.50 – approximately £7 at the then exchange rate – and described as a damp-stained 14th-century copy. Today, that sum would be roughly $450 (£339) adjusted for inflation.
However, medieval history professors David Carpenter of King's College London and Nicholas Vincent of the University of East Anglia now believe the manuscript is an original Magna Carta from the year 1300, issued during the reign of King Edward I.
“This is a fantastic discovery,” said Professor Carpenter, who first began analysing the document after encountering its digitised version on Harvard’s website. “It is the last Magna Carta... It deserves celebration, not as some mere copy, stained and faded, but as an original of one of the most significant documents in world constitutional history – a cornerstone of freedoms past, present and yet to be won.”
Professor Carpenter said he was “absolutely astonished” by the finding and by the fact that the manuscript’s true nature had gone unrecognised for decades. “That it was sold for peanuts and forgotten is incredible,” he added.
Magna Carta, first issued by King John in 1215, is widely regarded as a foundational document in the history of constitutional law. It established the principle that everyone, including the monarch, was subject to the law, and it granted basic liberties and protections to the king’s subjects. The charter has had a lasting influence, shaping constitutional frameworks in countries around the world.
The academics hope that the newly authenticated Magna Carta will be made available for public viewingHarvard
Following the 1215 version, the charter was reissued multiple times by successive monarchs, culminating in the 1300 edition issued under King Edward I. During this period, it is believed that around 200 original copies were produced and distributed across England. Only 25 of these originals are known to survive today, from the various editions between 1215 and 1300. Most are in the UK, with two in the US National Archives in Washington DC and one in Parliament House, Canberra.
“It is an icon both of the Western political tradition and of constitutional law,” said Professor Vincent. “If you asked anybody what the most famous single document in the history of the world is, they would probably name Magna Carta.”
The professors now believe the document discovered at Harvard originated in the town of Appleby, Cumbria. They traced its likely path through a prominent landowning family, the Lowthers, who are thought to have passed the manuscript to Thomas Clarkson, a leading anti-slavery campaigner in the 1780s. From there, the document entered the Maynard family estate.
In late 1945, Air Vice-Marshal Forster Maynard sold it at auction through Sotheby’s, where it was purchased by a London bookseller for £42. Harvard Law School acquired it months later for a fraction of that price, and it was catalogued as HLS MS 172 – a “copy made in 1327”.
The manuscript will become one of the most significant items in Harvard’s collectionHarvard
To determine the manuscript’s authenticity, Professors Carpenter and Vincent spent over a year analysing the text and comparing it to the six other known originals from the 1300 issue. Due to its faded condition, they did not work directly from the original but instead examined images taken using ultraviolet and spectral imaging techniques.
They found that the handwriting, dimensions and phrasing of the manuscript all matched the characteristics of the confirmed 1300 versions. The exact wording was critical to establishing its authenticity, as the text of Magna Carta was slightly altered with each reissue. The Harvard manuscript passed these tests “with flying colours”.
The value of the document could be extremely high. In 2007, a 1297 version of Magna Carta sold at auction in New York for $21 million – around £10.5 million at the time. While Professor Vincent declined to estimate the exact value of the Harvard version, he acknowledged it could be worth a similar figure.
Amanda Watson, assistant dean for library services at Harvard Law School, praised the discovery and the work of the academics involved. “This exemplifies what happens when collections are opened to brilliant scholars,” she said. “Behind every scholarly revelation stands the essential work of librarians, who not only collect and preserve materials, but create pathways that otherwise would remain hidden.”
The academics hope that the newly authenticated Magna Carta will be made available for public viewing, allowing more people to appreciate its historical significance.
“This document speaks to the very roots of legal liberty,” said Professor Carpenter. “It is more than just a piece of parchment – it’s a living symbol of the rights we enjoy and continue to fight for today.”
If confirmed by additional verification and widely recognised as an original, the manuscript will become one of the most significant items in Harvard’s collection and a key artefact in the history of global democracy.
Keep ReadingShow less
Yorkshire Water said boiling tap water before consumption
A temporary 'do not drink' notice was issued to residents in parts of North Yorkshire this week following the detection of coliform bacteria in the local water supply, indicating possible contamination with human or animal waste.
Yorkshire Water advised nearly 200 postcodes across High Bentham, Low Bentham, and Burton in Lonsdale not to consume tap water unless it had been boiled, after routine testing identified above-average levels of coliforms. These bacteria are found in the digestive systems of humans and animals and can include strains such as E. coli. While coliforms themselves can cause gastrointestinal illness, including diarrhoea and stomach cramps, their presence may also indicate the risk of other harmful bacteria in the water system.
In a statement issued on Tuesday evening, Yorkshire Water said boiling tap water before consumption would provide adequate protection. Bottled water was also supplied to customers registered on the company’s priority services list, including those with medical needs or limited access to boiling facilities.
The company confirmed that all impacted properties had received hand-delivered boil water notices, and customers could check their address status via Yorkshire Water’s website. During the incident, the company said it was continuing to carry out sampling to monitor the quality of the water supply and was working closely with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) to identify the cause and ensure safety.
The contamination is still being investigatediStock
On Wednesday at 5:15pm, Yorkshire Water announced that the boil water notice had been lifted for all affected areas. The company stated: “We can confirm that we are now able to lift the boil water instruction at all affected properties in the local area as the water is now back to our usual high standards. Customers can now use their tap water as normal.”
A spokesperson added: “We’d like to apologise to everybody impacted and thank them for their understanding and patience throughout.”
While the cause of the contamination is still being investigated, Yorkshire Water reiterated that it had taken swift action to protect public health and to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.
The boil order came as part of routine water quality testing, which Yorkshire Water said had detected results that did not meet its usual standards. Until the problem was resolved, the company urged caution and reassured customers that boiling water was an effective precautionary measure.
The incident highlights the importance of regular testing and rapid response protocols in maintaining safe public water supplies. Though the warning has now been lifted, Yorkshire Water is expected to continue investigating the root cause of the contamination to prevent future occurrences.