‘Lack of funding leaves south Asian domestic abuse survivors vulnerable’
As many as 76 per cent of workers in the sector said their caseload had increased in the past 12 months
By Nadeem BadshahJul 14, 2023
CHARITIES supporting Asian domestic abuse survivors are in a funding crisis with a lack of space in refuges and a shortage of trained frontline workers, experts have cautioned.
They said further services are at risk of shrinking or closing due to a dearth of financial support.
Research by the Refuge charity found that 85 per cent of frontline workers believe their community-based service is being impacted by insufficient funding. And 76 per cent of workers in the sector said their caseload had increased in the past 12 months.
In 2022-23, the number of new clients supported by Refuge’s community-based services increased by 10 per cent from the previous year.
Sundari Anitha, professor of gender, violence and work at the University of Lincoln, said since 2010 there has been a “huge reduction” on spending on domestic violence services across the board.
She told Eastern Eye: “Services have been shut down. But not everyone is equally disadvantaged in funding cuts.
“There has been a greater degree of cuts in services for BAME women in the past 13 years. These services were not enough as it was; they were overstretched.
“In BAME refuges there are high occupancy rates of 95-96 per cent, so women have to wait longer.
“These organisations are smaller; funding sources are more irregular and not all are supported by local authorities. They are very precarious and they have staff on short-term contracts which affects the staff you can attract.”
A coalition of 11 women’s sector organisations sent a petition to justice secretary Alex Chalk in late June stating at least £238 million a year is needed for such services through the Victims and Prisoners Bill.
Anitha added: “It is not a postcode lottery. Those who are disadvantaged already are more disadvantaged. There is a correlation between poverty and domestic violence – if you don’t have secure immigration status, it is harder to access services or you live in overcrowded housing, are trapped with an abusive husband and in-laws.
“We also need to ringfence ‘for and by’ services like for south Asian women.”
A report by Women’s Aid said an annual investment of £427m is required to fund community-based and refuge services “to the level needed to support women and children who need to access them” with the latter requiring a minimum of £189m.
The charity said research estimated the economic and social costs of domestic abuse in England in 2022 were just under £78 billion and argued an effective intervention could save up to £23bn a year.
Aneeta Prem MBE, founder of the Freedom charity, which supports domestic abuse survivors, said her organisation is facing a challenge of insufficient funding. She told Eastern Eye: “This issue not only impacts Freedom’s capacity, but also hampers its ability to deliver essential services.
“I speak to frontline workers who support south Asian survivors on a daily basis and they all express concern over the lack of funding.
“In reality, this translates to even greater vulnerability for survivors from south Asian communities. “There is a shortage of available space in refuge centres and a lack of properly trained frontline professionals. Consequently, there’s a genuine risk that these individuals may not receive the necessary help when escaping from violence. By providing adequate training and funding, we can make a tangible difference.”
Tina*, a survivor of domestic abuse who accessed community-based services through Refuge, believes her Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA) was “the reason I was able to access support to deal with the impacts of my ex’s abuse”.
“While I was entangled with the criminal justice system my support network was cut off from me for two years, which left me feeling so alone.
“My IDVA was able to get me the emotional, medical, economic and physical support I needed after leaving my abuser.
“It was thanks to community-based services that I got the debt my ex accrued in my name cleared, had someone with me to help process information in court, and had emotional support to cope with my PTSD, anxiety and depression.”
Prem added much of Freedom Charity’s work with young people in schools, colleges, universities is undertaken voluntarily, because neither profession[1]al bodies nor educational institutions have sufficient funding as a charity.
The former police officer said: “For example, looking at recent statistics on forced marriage, it is disheartening to note a decline in reported cases. “Instead of celebrating this decrease, I would argue that it highlights the lack of awareness among many frontline professionals regarding the complexity of this issue. Both the survivors and the professionals assisting them have not received the necessary support and assistance.
“This is primarily due to insufficient funding, but also because the staff has not received adequate training, especially in light of the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.” Recent research by the University of Lincoln and the University of Bristol found that queries to the government’s forced marriage unit declined from 1,507 in 2018 to 337 in 2021 which has been linked to the pandemic.
Aneeta Prem MBE
Separate data from Karma Nirvana, which sup[1]ports forced marriage victims, showed its helpline dealt with 42 per cent more cases between April 2022 and March 2023 than they did in the same period two years before.
Amjad Malik, a solicitor in Greater Manchester, said: “I think due to negative publicity about asylum claimants, boats coming to the UK, especially those who come to our shores via Europe, is impacting funding decisions on merit.
“Funding must be increased and those vulnerable benefit from such services. Charities are doing a greater job under the circumstances.”
Polly Harrar, founder of The Sharan Project charity, said a lack of sustainable funding presents an immediate threat to “by and for” charities that work within south Asian communities and could lead to the closure of specialist services.
She added: “Due to the cost of living crisis, we have seen an increase in calls to our service, particularly where survivors are struggling to escape domestic abuse or to financially cope when they do leave, however we have not seen funding to address these needs.
“We have always known there is a disparity in how charitable funding is allocated, but the scale of the issue truly is staggering so while we welcome calls to increase funding for community led services, we need action and we need it now.”
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “This government is committed to ensuring that victims of domestic abuse can receive the support they need, whenever they need it.
“That’s why we are quadrupling funding for victim support services, including investment to increase the number of independent sexual and domestic abuse advisers by almost half.
“At the same time, our Victims and Prisoners Bill will enshrine their rights in law for the first time, making sure victims get the support to which they are entitled.”
THE US State Department on Monday said it was imposing visa restrictions on owners and staff of travel agencies in India who it says knowingly facilitate illegal migration to the United States.
An unspecified number of individuals associated with these travel agencies are being subjected to visa bans under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The action is based on information collected by the US mission in India, according to department spokesperson Tammy Bruce.
Washington often imposes such visa restrictions without naming the individuals involved.
"We will continue to take steps to impose visa restrictions against owners, executives, and senior officials of travel agencies to cut off alien smuggling networks," Bruce said. She did not provide details on how the travel agents had facilitated illegal migration.
The action is part of a broader effort under president Donald Trump's administration to curb migration to the United States and deport undocumented immigrants already in the country.
The US embassy in New Delhi has also issued repeated warnings on its social media platforms, advising Indian nationals visiting the United States not to overstay their authorised period of stay. It warned that overstaying could lead to deportation and a permanent ban from entering the country.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown has led to more than 65,000 holiday rental listings being removed from the platform, as the Spanish government takes firm action to address breaches in national regulations and respond to growing housing concerns.
The Ministry of Consumer Affairs ordered the mass delisting due to thousands of properties lacking valid licence numbers, having unclear ownership records, or showing discrepancies between listed information and official housing databases. The government said these violations warranted immediate removal from Airbnb’s platform.
This action is part of a wider effort to bring order to Spain’s short-term rental sector and alleviate the country's worsening housing affordability crisis, especially in major tourist destinations such as Madrid, Andalusia and Catalonia, where the volume of tourist rentals has surged.
Consumer Affairs Minister Pablo Bustinduy said the government aimed to end what he described as a “lack of control” and growing “illegality” in the holiday rentals market. “No more excuses. Enough with protecting those who make a business out of the right to housing in our country,” he said during a press briefing.
The decision follows a broader trend of local authorities in Spain cracking down on tourist rentals. In 2023, the city of Barcelona announced a plan to eliminate all 10,000 of its licensed short-term lets by 2028, arguing that housing must be prioritised for long-term residents rather than tourists.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown reflects rising pressure on public officials to act, as protests continue over high rents and property prices, particularly in cities with large tourism industries. Many residents and campaigners argue that the expansion of short-term rentals has significantly reduced the availability of affordable housing.
- YouTubeYouTube/ WGN News
According to official data, there were approximately 321,000 licensed holiday rental properties across Spain as of November 2023, representing a 15% increase compared to 2020. Authorities believe many more operate without licences, prompting the Consumer Affairs Ministry to open a formal investigation into Airbnb in December.
In response to earlier scrutiny, Airbnb said it requires hosts to confirm they have permission to rent their properties and that they follow local laws. However, the company also claimed the government had not provided a clear list of non-compliant listings. It added that not all owners are required to hold a licence and questioned whether the ministry had the authority to regulate digital platforms.
Airbnb has yet to issue a formal response to the latest action.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown aligns with similar efforts across Europe, including in Portugal, the Netherlands and parts of Italy, where governments are introducing stricter regulations on short-term rentals in a bid to balance tourism with long-term housing needs.
As Spain continues to grapple with housing shortages and rising costs, the government has made clear that further measures may follow to ensure platforms and property owners comply with national laws.
Keep ReadingShow less
The man stood up during a Teams call to adjust a cable behind his computer, without wearing any trousers.
A MANAGER was sacked from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) after accidentally flashing his genitals during a video call, an employment tribunal has ruled.
The digital production manager, referred to as DB in the tribunal’s ruling, was earning £58,580 a year when the incident occurred. He stood up during a Teams call to adjust a cable behind his computer, without wearing any trousers, The Telegraph reported.
The tribunal said: “During the call, after approximately three minutes 26 seconds, the claimant stood to adjust a cable behind the computer and revealed he was wearing nothing from the waist down. His genitals were visible.”
Two Capgemini consultants based in India, who were on the call, complained to the FSCS the following week. An internal investigation concluded the staffer was “inappropriately dressed” and “naked from the waist down.”
DB, born in India, in the employment tribunal’s ruling, told his line manager in an email that he did not realise his camera was on and closed his laptop when he noticed. He was dismissed in January 2024 for breaching FSCS rules requiring employees to be dressed appropriately.
He later filed a complaint for unfair dismissal and racial discrimination. The tribunal ruled the dismissal was lawful and said his discrimination claims were not well founded, The Telegraph reported.
Keep ReadingShow less
He was jailed in October after admitting to breaching an injunction that barred him from repeating false claims about a Syrian refugee who had successfully sued him for libel. (Photo: Getty Images)
STEPHEN YAXLEY-LENNON, also known as Tommy Robinson, is set to be released from prison within a week after the High Court reduced his 18-month sentence for contempt of court.
The far-right anti-Islam activist was jailed in October after admitting to breaching an injunction that barred him from repeating false claims about a Syrian refugee who had successfully sued him for libel.
The Solicitor General had taken legal action against Yaxley-Lennon for comments made in online interviews and a documentary titled Silenced, which was viewed millions of times and shown in Trafalgar Square in July.
The sentence was made up of a 14-month punitive element and a four-month coercive element. Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson had said the four-month part could be lifted if Yaxley-Lennon complied with the court order to remove Silenced and related content from social media and other platforms.
On Tuesday, Yaxley-Lennon appeared via video link from HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes. His lawyer, Alex Di Francesco, told the court that Silenced had been removed from accounts under his control and that requests were made to remove other interviews where the false allegations were repeated.
Judge Johnson ruled that Yaxley-Lennon had “purged” his contempt. “The practical effect is that the defendant will be released once he has completed the punitive element, which I understand will be within the next week,” he said. The original release date had been set for 26 July, but it has now been moved up to 26 May.
The judge noted that while there was “an absence of contrition or remorse”, Yaxley-Lennon had given assurances that he would comply with the injunction in the future and understood the consequences of breaching it again. The court accepted that he had shown a “change in attitude” and had taken steps to comply with the order.
Yaxley-Lennon, 42, was jailed for 10 admitted breaches of the injunction after two contempt of court claims were brought against him by the Solicitor General. The injunction was first issued in 2021 after he falsely accused a Syrian teenager in a viral video of being violent. The teenager later won a libel case against him.
He was accused by some media and politicians of inflaming tensions that led to riots across Britain in July and August last year, following the murder of three girls at a dance workshop in Southport.
In January, a post from his social media account claimed that US billionaire Elon Musk was paying some of his legal fees. Musk has not confirmed this.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The first lady described the law as a "national victory"
US First Lady Melania Trump has welcomed a new law criminalising the non-consensual sharing of explicit images, including AI-generated deepfake content, calling it a major step towards protecting children and families from online exploitation.
The Take It Down Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump, makes it a federal offence to post "intimate images", whether real or digitally fabricated, without the subject’s consent. Under the legislation, individuals found guilty of intentionally distributing such content could face up to three years in prison. The law also compels technology companies to remove the offending material within 48 hours of notification.
The bill, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, 409 votes to 2 in the House of Representatives and unanimously in the Senate in February, has been one of the most widely backed pieces of legislation during Trump’s second term in office. It marks the sixth bill signed into law since his re-election, with the administration often favouring executive orders to implement its agenda.
Melania Trump, who has largely kept a low public profile, played a key role in advancing the legislation. The first lady described the law as a "national victory" and stressed its importance in shielding children from harmful online behaviour.
“This legislation is a powerful step forward in our efforts to ensure that every American, especially young people, can feel better protected from their image or identity being abused,” she said. “It will help parents and families safeguard children from online exploitation.”
Melania Trump first appeared publicly in support of the legislation in March during a solo roundtable event on Capitol Hill, where she urged lawmakers to pass the bill. “It’s heartbreaking to witness young teens, especially girls, grappling with the overwhelming challenges posed by malicious online content, like deepfakes,” she said at the time.
The law addresses two main forms of abuse: revenge porn the non-consensual sharing of intimate real images and deepfake pornography, where AI is used to create fake explicit material by inserting someone’s face into pornographic content. These practices have become increasingly common, particularly targeting women and public figures.
Paris Hilton, businesswoman and DJ, publicly supported the legislation, calling it “a crucial step toward ending non-consensual image sharing online”. Major tech firms, including Meta, TikTok and Google, have also backed the new law.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the first lady was “instrumental” in rallying support for the bill and ensuring its passage through Congress.
Despite the strong support, the legislation has attracted criticism from some digital rights organisations. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned that the law’s broad scope could have unintended consequences for free speech and privacy.
“While protecting victims of these heinous privacy invasions is a legitimate goal, good intentions alone are not enough to make good policy,” the group said. “As currently drafted, the Act mandates a notice-and-takedown system that threatens free expression, user privacy, and due process, without addressing the problem it claims to solve.”
The Internet Society, another advocacy group for digital privacy, raised concerns that the law could undermine encryption and pose “unacceptable risks to users’ fundamental privacy rights and cybersecurity”.
Critics argue that the bill, while well-intentioned, lacks adequate safeguards to prevent misuse and could result in overreach, affecting legal online content, including LGBTQ+ material, adult entertainment, and political commentary.
Nonetheless, supporters maintain that the new law fills a critical gap in US legislation by targeting a growing form of online abuse and sending a strong message against digital exploitation.