Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

India’s top court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

Electoral bonds were launched by Modi government to make political funding more transparent. But critics say it has made it opaque 

India’s top court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

In a landmark judgement, the Indian Supreme Court on Thursday annulled the electoral bonds scheme, saying it violates the constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the right to information. 

Electoral bonds were launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government in 2018 to make political funding more transparent. But critics say it has made the process opaque. 


It allows individuals and companies to donate money to political parties anonymously and without any limits. The donors need to buy bonds from the government-run State Bank of India (SBI) and donate them to a political party. 

The apex court ordered the SBI to discontinue issuing these bonds and disclose to the Election Commission by March 6 the names of the contributors to the six-year-old scheme. 

These interest-free, time-limited bonds are issued in fixed denominations - Rs 1,000 to Rs 10 million - and can be purchased from SBI during specific periods throughout the year. 

So far, electoral bonds worth Rs 160 billion (£1.5bn) have been sold in 29 tranches. Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has received most of these funds.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud directed the Election Commission to publish the information shared by SBI on its official website by March 13. 

The bench, also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, delivered two separate and unanimous verdicts on the pleas challenging the scheme. 

Pronouncing the verdict, the CJI said the scheme is violative of the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. 

"They infringe upon the right to information of the voter by anonymising contribution through electoral bonds are violative of Article 19 (1)(a)," the CJI said while pronouncing the verdict. 

Chandrachud said the Right to Information (RTI) law is "not confined to state affairs but also includes information necessary for participatory democracy".

"Political parties are relevant units in the electoral process and information about funding of political parties is essential for electoral choices," he added.

The court observed that "Political contributions give a seat at the table to the contributor... this access also translates into influence over policy making." Because of the close nexus between money and politics it is possible that financial contributions "would lead to quid pro quo arrangements", the court added. 

 In October last year, the bench began hearing arguments on the four petitions, including those filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), and the NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR). 

Advocate Varun Thakur, who represented Thakur in the case, described the verdict as a setback for the government "because from 2018 to 2024 whatever transactions which have taken place have to be made public". 

"It is a setback because of the way anonymous contributions were received through the scheme. Now accountability will be fixed," Thakur added. 

"The Supreme Court has struck down the Electoral Bond scheme and all the provisions that were made to bring it into effect," said Prashant Bhushan, a lawyer representing the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) watchdog. 

The scheme, which was notified by the government on January 2, 2018, was pitched as an alternative to cash donations made to political parties as part of efforts to bring transparency in political funding. Elections in India are primarily funded through private donations. 

According to the provisions of the scheme, electoral bonds may be purchased by any citizen of India or entity incorporated or established in the country. An individual can buy electoral bonds, either singly or jointly with other individuals without disclosing their identity. 

Critics have said this eliminates transparency in electoral funding and gives an edge to ruling parties. They also felt it was an opaque way to funnel "black money" to parties. 

Verdict welcomed 

Opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi welcomed the judgment, accusing the BJP of using the bond system as a "medium for taking bribes and commission". 

Senior Congress leader and former finance minister P Chidambaram on Thursday hailed it as a great victory for transparency.  

"The fact that the BJP cornered nearly 90 per cent of the donations by corporates and high net worth individuals will be exposed now. Let the world know who gave money, when the money was given, and to which party it was given," he said. 

Former chief election commissioner S Y Quraishi, a vocal critic of this scheme, termed the Supreme Court verdict a "great boon for democracy". "Every issue that we raised has been tackled in the judgement," he added. 

The BJP, however, sought to downplay the Supreme Court verdict, saying every decision of the apex court should be respected. Party spokesperson Nalin Kohli said the Opposition is politicising the issue as it does not have any alternative to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership and the positive work done by his government. (Agencies)

More For You

Rajnath Singh

The council that approved the initiation of procurement for arms and equipment is headed by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. (Photo: Reuters)

Reuters

India starts process to procure arms worth $12.31 billion

INDIA’s Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) has approved the initiation of procurement for arms and equipment worth $12.31 billion (£9.05 billion), the defence ministry said on Thursday.

The council is headed by India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.

Keep ReadingShow less
uk weather

Forecasts indicate that the weekend will be unsettled

Getty Images

Cooler conditions bring relief as UK heatwave ends

Key points

  • UK's second heatwave of 2025 ends with cooler temperatures setting in.
  • Tuesday recorded the year’s highest temperature at 34.7°C in London.
  • No return to heatwave conditions forecast for early July.
  • Showers expected in parts of Scotland and Northern Ireland, with drier weather ahead.

UK heatwave fades as cooler weather returns

Following a stretch of record-breaking heat, the UK has now entered a cooler phase, with no heatwave conditions forecast for the first half of July. This change comes after Tuesday became the hottest day of the year so far, with 34.7°C recorded in London’s St James’s Park.

However, the high temperatures that marked the start of July have now given way to more comfortable conditions. In many parts of the country, temperatures have dropped by more than 10°C, bringing relief from the extreme heat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families slam Hancock's 'insulting' care home defence at Covid inquiry

Matt Hancock arrives ahead of his latest appearance before the Covid-19 Inquiry on July 02, 2025 in London, England.(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Families slam Hancock's 'insulting' care home defence at Covid inquiry

BEREAVED families have condemned former health secretary Matt Hancock as "insulting" and "full of excuses" after he defended the controversial policy of moving untested hospital patients into care homes during the early days of the Covid pandemic.

Speaking at the Covid-19 inquiry on Wednesday (2), Hancock described the decision to discharge patients into care homes as "the least-worst decision" available at the time, despite the devastating death toll that followed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer-Getty

Starmer has said the NHS must 'reform or die' and promised changes that would control the rising costs of caring for an ageing population without increasing taxes. (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

Starmer outlines 10-year NHS reform strategy

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer will on Thursday launch a 10-year strategy aimed at fixing the National Health Service (NHS), which he said was in crisis. The plan seeks to ease the pressure on overstretched hospitals and shift care closer to people’s homes.

The NHS, which is publicly funded and state-run, has faced difficulties recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic. It continues to experience annual winter pressures, repeated waves of industrial action, and a long backlog for elective treatments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer-Reeves-Getty

Starmer and Reeves during a visit to Horiba Mira in Nuneaton, to mark the launch of the Government's Industrial Strategy on June 23, 2025 in Nuneaton. (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

Reeves ‘going nowhere’, says Starmer after tears in parliament

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer on Wednesday said that Chancellor Rachel Reeves would remain in her role for “a very long time to come”, after she appeared visibly upset in parliament as questions were raised about her future.

Reeves was seen with tears rolling down her face during Prime Minister’s Questions, after Starmer did not confirm whether she would remain chancellor until the next general election, expected in 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less