‘Its diversity and growth story give enough reasons for optimism about future’
By AMIT ROYAug 23, 2022
THE 1990s were a time of hope in India.
One of my jobs at the Daily Telegraph was to travel regularly to India and do surveys of the Indian economy.
While I would do the journalistic interviews, an accompanying colleague from advertising would try to persuade captains of industry to take out ads in the paper. I still have his rate card: £36,500 for a full-page ad; £45,000 if it was in colour. One special report carried so much advertising, I reckoned the paper made £150,000 from the venture.
One of the trips was in July 1995 when PV Narasimha Rao of the Congress Party was the prime minister. He had started the process of liberalisation in 1991, when he had opened India up to the challenges of the global economy. He had appointed Dr Manmohan Singh, an Oxbridge educated academic and former
governor of the Reserve Bank of India, as his finance minister. Singh became prime minister from 2004-2009 and served a second term from 2009-2014, before Narendra Modi of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power that year.
PV Narasimha Rao (Photo: Douglas E Curra/AFP/Getty Images)
In 1995, Dileep Padgaonkar, former editor of the Times of India, told me: “Economic liberalisation is doing extraordinary things to Indian society. Words such as money and profit are no longer derogatory. For the first time, I feel optimistic about India.”
Tarun Das, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry – India’s equivalent of the Confederation of British Industry – predicted: “India will definitely emerge as an economic superpower.”
I went to Bangalore, capital of Karnataka, which was even then being hailed as the “Silicon Valley of India”. It was the city of “booze and bleepers”. Bangalore had 150 very noisy pubs. Business folk wore bleepers to show how important they were – mobile phones, which would transform India, were a thing of the future. I stayed at the Windsor Manor, where I was allocated a personal Jeeves.
Bangalore, known as the Silicon Valley of India (Photo by MANJUNATH KIRAN/AFP via Getty Images)
So far as the British media is concerned, the perception of India has changed over the past 75 years from a third world country to an economic powerhouse with a large middle class population. That is why post Brexit, the UK is keen to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement with India. On his trip to India in April this year, prime minister Boris Johnson expressed the hope that an agreement would be ready to sign “by Diwali”.
The way British newspapers once dealt with India was very different.
At the Daily Telegraph, for example, we would routinely report the “immigration figures” issued by the Home Office. If “New Commonwealth” immigration, notably from India and Pakistan, was down, that was regarded as a positive development. In 1979, some Indian women coming as intended brides were subjected to “virginity tests” by male immigration officers at Heathrow.
By and by, the economic story from India became more important. The business pages of newspapers began taking more of an interest in India. Looking back on it now, there was another important development, but this time in the UK.
This was in 1990. Philip Beresford, who was compiling the Rich List for the Sunday Times, came across a couple of Asian names. Did I know them? Could I suggest a couple more? I said I could offer another 50, possibly even 100.
In the event, the first Asian Rich List was published in Management Today, which Beresford took over as editor. I took the story to the Daily Telegraph, which I had rejoined. It ran in the Telegraph Colour Magazine with a cover picture of Naresh Patel, of Colorama, standing in front of a Porsche. The headline was: “My other car is a Rolls.”
The piece introduced characters then unknown – such as Srichand Hinduja and Swraj Paul – but who have subsequently become familiar ones.
What the Asian Rich List did was dispel the notion that Indians had emigrated to Britain to live as parasites on state handouts. On the contrary, they were creating jobs for ordinary people.
Gopichand Hinduja with the 2021 Asian Rich List, is flanked by the Asian Media Group’s ShaileshSolanki (left) and Kalpesh Solanki
British Indian society was also changing. At a Sunday Telegraph news conference on a Tuesday, Charles Moore, the editor, said he thought I looked a bit tired.
A colleague cut in disloyally: “That’s because he’s always going to parties.”
It ended with Charles ordering me to do a piece on the glamorous Friday night parties that Ramola Bachchan (married to Amitabh Bachchan’s younger brother, Ajitabh Bachchan) held at her home – 2 Frognal – in the heart of Hampstead village in north London.
Ramola’s tables offered a choice of Indian, Italian and Thai food. And there was champagne. Hers was the best party in town where one could meet anyone who was anyone in the new India. Anil Agarwal (of Vedanta) was a regular guest. On another occasion, I remember Imran Khan, ever the party boy, dropping in. Ramola’s parties reflected what was happening in the resurgent new India.
In the early years of independence, the Indian economy was protectionist, but the country did build up its industrial infrastructure, which made Rao and Singh’s economic reforms possible. Rajiv Gandhi, who had taken over as prime minister after the assassination of his mother, Indira Gandhi, in 1984, was a young man with a progressive vision of the future. He certainly believed in computers.
I saw him in 1986 when he said he wanted India to be an economic superpower by the end of the century.
My first survey of the Indian economy was in 1993 when John Major was the chief guest at the Republic Day celebrations on January 26. Television was starting to drive middle class and even rural aspirations. Adi Godrej, managing director of Godrej Soaps, said increasing soap sales were an indicator of social change. “A village woman will not spend 93p on a bottle of shampoo, but she will buy a 2p sachet,” he observed.
In 1994, I spoke to Shoba (now Shobaa) De, author of such racy novels as Starry Nights and Socialite Evenings. “Almost every Christmas or New year’s eve party this year will be black tie,” she said.
In 2006, I interviewed Manmohan Singh who said: “Today all sections of our economy are open for foreign investment. Our effort is to ensure that India has a world class infrastructure. That includes ports, airports, roads, the transport services, a lot more investment in the power sector and other related energy systems. These are our highest priorities.”
The prime minister added: “We also want our financial services system to be liberalised and expanded. All these are areas in which I believe the United Kingdom has distinct capabilities which can be harnessed to our mutual advantage.”
I also met Ratan Tata, chairman of the Tata Group at his office, Bombay House, in Mumbai. He did not tell me he was poised to make a bid for Jaguar Land Rover and Corus Steel, but he did say: “Protection has been India’s worst enemy but, thanks to globalisation, 25-30 per cent of our revenues comes from overseas business.”
Ratan Tata (Photo: Harold Cunningham/Getty Images)
In 2010, I was in Delhi for David Cameron’s first visit as prime minister. He had gone as opposition leader in 2006 and would visit twice more as prime minister and was always accompanied by large trade delegations.
One shouldn’t be boastful. India is still not an economic superpower. It has a long way to go before it catches up with China. But in the last 75 years, it has come a long way. Despite all the problems the world is facing after the pandemic, one can be reasonably optimistic about the Indian economy. Its diversity should be a source of strength.
CANADIAN prime minister Mark Carney invited his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to the upcoming Group of Seven summit in a phone call on Friday (6), as the two sides look to mend ties after relations soured in the past two years.
The leaders agreed to remain in contact and looked forward to meeting at the G7 summit later this month, a readout from Carney's office said.
India is not a G7 member but can be invited as a guest to its annual gathering, which will be held this year in Kananaskis in the Canadian province of Alberta, from June 15 to 17.
"Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister (Carney) ... thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit," Modi said in a post on X.
Modi also stated in his post on Friday that India and Canada would work together "with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests."
Bilateral ties deteriorated after Canada accused India of involvement in a Sikh separatist leader's murder, and of attempting to interfere in two recent elections. Canada expelled several top Indian diplomats and consular officials in October 2024 after linking them to the murder and alleged a broader effort to target Indian dissidents in Canada.
New Delhi has denied the allegations, and expelled the same number of Canadian diplomats in response.
India is Canada's 10th largest trading partner and Canada is the biggest exporter of pulses, including lentils, to India.
Carney, who is trying to diversify trade away from the United States, said it made sense for the G7 to invite India, since it had the fifth-largest economy in the world and was at the heart of a number of supply chains.
"In addition, bilaterally, we have now agreed, importantly, to continued law enforcement dialogue, so there's been some progress on that, that recognizes issues of accountability. I extended the invitation to prime minister Modi in that context," he told reporters in Ottawa.
Four Indian nationals have been charged in the killing of the Sikh separatist leader.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Foreign secretary David Lammy. (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images)
FOREIGN SECRETARY David Lammy arrived in Delhi on Saturday (7) for a two-day visit aimed at strengthening economic and security ties with India, following the landmark free trade agreement finalised last month.
During his visit, Lammy will hold wide-ranging talks with his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar and is scheduled to meet prime minister Narendra Modi, as well as commerce minister Piyush Goyal.
According to a statement, the discussions will focus on bilateral ties in areas of trade, defence and security, building on the ambitious free trade agreement (FTA) finalised on May 6.
The FTA represents the biggest deal the UK has finalised since leaving the European Union. Under the agreement, 99 per cent of Indian exports will be exempt from tariffs, while making it easier for British firms to export whisky, cars and other products to India.
"India was one of my first visits as Foreign Secretary, and since then has been a key partner in the delivery of our Plan for Change," Lammy said. "Signing a free trade agreement is just the start of our ambitions - we're building a modern partnership with India for a new global era. We want to go even further to foster an even closer relationship and cooperate when it comes to delivering growth, fostering innovative technology, tackling the climate crisis and delivering our migration priorities."
The minister will also welcome progress on migration partnerships, including ongoing efforts to safeguard citizens and secure borders in both countries. Migration remains a top priority for the government, with Lammy focused on working with international partners to strengthen the UK's border security.
Business investment will also feature prominently in the discussions, with Lammy set to meet leading Indian business figures to explore opportunities for greater Indian investment in Britain.
The current investment relationship already supports over 600,000 jobs across both countries, with more than 950 Indian-owned companies operating in the UK and over 650 British companies in India. For five consecutive years, India has been the UK's second-largest source of investment projects.
The talks will also address regional security concerns, with India expected to raise the issue of cross-border terrorism from Pakistan with the foreign secretary. The UK played a role in helping to de-escalate tensions during last month's military conflict between India and Pakistan, following the deadly Pahalgam terrorist attack in Kashmir.
Lammy had previously visited Islamabad from May 16, during which he welcomed the understanding between India and Pakistan to halt military actions.
His visit is also expected to lay the groundwork for a possible trip to New Delhi by prime minister Keir Starmer. This is Lammy's second visit to India as foreign secretary, following his inaugural trip in July when he announced the UK-India Technology Security Initiative focusing on collaboration in telecoms security and emerging technologies.
(with inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Seema Misra was wrongly imprisoned in 2010 after being accused of stealing £75,000 from her Post Office branch in Surrey, where she was the subpostmistress. (Photo credit: Getty Images)
SEEMA MISRA, a former sub-postmistress from Surrey who was wrongly jailed in the Post Office scandal, told MPs that her teenage son fears she could be sent to prison again.
Misra served five months in jail in 2010 after being wrongly convicted of theft. She said she was pregnant at the time, and the only reason she did not take her own life was because of her unborn child, The Times reported.
Speaking at a meeting in parliament on Tuesday, she said, “It affects our whole family. My 13-year-old younger son said, ‘Mummy, if the Post Office put you back in prison don’t kill yourself — you didn’t kill yourself [when you were in prison] because I was in your tummy. What if they do it again?’”
Misra, who wore an electronic tag when giving birth, supported a campaign to change the law around compensation for miscarriages of justice.
In 2014, the law was changed under Lord Cameron, requiring victims to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt to receive compensation. Campaigners say this has resulted in only 6.6 per cent of claims being successful, down from 46 per cent, and average payouts dropping from £270,000 to less than £70,000.
Sir David Davis called the rule change an “institutional miscarriage of justice” during prime minister’s questions and urged the government to act.
Dame Vera Baird, interim head of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, has also announced a full review of the body’s operations, following years of criticism over its performance.
Keep ReadingShow less
Habibur Masum pleaded guilty at Bradford Crown Court to manslaughter and possession of a bladed article. (Photo: West Yorkshire Police)
A MAN has admitted killing his wife as she pushed their baby in a pram through Bradford city centre, but has denied her murder.
Habibur Masum, 26, pleaded guilty at Bradford Crown Court to manslaughter and possession of a bladed article. He denied the charge of murder. The victim, 27-year-old Kulsuma Akter, was stabbed multiple times on 6 April last year. The baby was unharmed.
Masum, of Leamington Avenue, Burnley, was remanded in custody by Justice Cotter and is due to stand trial for murder on Monday.
He also denied two charges of assault, one count of making threats to kill and one charge of stalking. During a previous hearing, the court was told those charges relate to incidents over two days in November 2023.
The stalking charge alleges Masum tracked Akter between November and April, found her location at a safe house, sent threatening messages including photos and videos, loitered near her temporary residence, and caused her alarm or distress and fear of violence.
Akter was attacked at around 15:20 BST on Westgate near Drewton Road. She later died in hospital. Masum was arrested in Aylesbury after a three-day manhunt by West Yorkshire Police.
Her mother, Monwara Begum, speaking from Bangladesh last year, said: "I am in shock. She was my youngest daughter and I adored her greatly... The only day I didn't hear from her was the day she was attacked."
Keep ReadingShow less
Bags of rubbish and bins overflow on the pavement in the Selly Oak area on June 02, 2025 in Birmingham, England.(Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
MEMBERS of the Unite union voted by 97 per cent on a 75 per cent turn out in favour of continuing the industrial action in Birmingham, which began intermittently in January before becoming an all-out stoppage in March.
At the centre of the dispute is a pay row between the cash-strapped city council and workers belonging to Unite which says some staff employed by the council stand to lose £8,000 per year under a planned restructuring of the refuse service.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said a proposal by Birmingham City Council was not in line with an offer discussed in May in talks under a conciliation service.
She accused the Labour "government commissioners and the leaders of the council" of watering it down.
"It beggars belief that a Labour government and Labour council is treating these workers so disgracefully," she said. "Unite will not allow these workers to be financially ruined –- the strikes will continue for as long as it takes."
Although non-unionised workers have been collecting bins during the strike the industrial action continues to cause disruption to rubbish removal resulting in concerns about rats and public health.
The dispute in the city of over a million people, known for its industrial past and multicultural character, is an illustration of the budgetary pressures facing many other local authorities across the country.
A council spokesperson denied there had been any watering down of the deal.
"This is a service that needs to be transformed to one that citizens of Birmingham deserve and the council remains committed to resolving this dispute, the spokesperson said.
"We have made a fair and reasonable offer that we have asked Unite to put to their members and we are awaiting their response.”
Council defends ‘ambitious’ vision for city, reports LDRS
In another development, Birmingham council has defended an “ambitious” plan for the city’s future despite the vision being slammed as “devoid of reality”.
The local authority’s corporate plan sets out the priorities for Birmingham over the next three years and how it intends to overcome the issues which have recently plagued the council.
In a bid to make the city fairer, greener and healthier, the Labour-run council’s plan explores how it can tackle critical challenges such as housing need, health inequalities, unemployment and child poverty.
Bags of rubbish and bins overflow on the pavement in the Sparkbrook area on June 02, 2025 in Birmingham, England. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
But the council’s vision came under fire during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday (3) with Conservative group leader Robert Alden pointing to its aspiration of improving street cleaning and waste services.
He went on to say the city’s bins service was currently not operating properly as the ongoing bins strike continues to take its toll.
“This plan is devoid of the reality of the situation the council finds itself in,” he argued. “That’s a fundamental problem as to why it will fail.
“Residents expect the city to balance the books and to clean the streets – this corporate plan doesn’t do it.
Councillor Alden added: “A lot of officer time and resources have been spent producing yet more colourful, lovely dossiers to hand out and claim that the future will be different.”
Acknowledging the financial turmoil which has plagued the authority, council leader John Cotton said the Labour administration had made significant progress in “fixing the foundations”.
He continued: “Fixing those foundations is essential if we’re going to deliver on ambitions for this city – and we should make no apology for being ambitious for Birmingham and its people.
“This is exactly what this corporate plan is about – it’s about looking forward to the future.”
Cotton went on to say the plan sets out the council’s “high level ambitions” and “major targets” for the city over the next few years.
“It’s also underpinned by a lot of detailed policy and strategy that’s come before this cabinet previously,” he said.
“It’s important not to just look at one document – we need to look at this being the guiding document that governs all the other work that this council is undertaking.”
Deputy leader Coun Sharon Thompson added: “We have to be ambitious for the residents of Birmingham – that is we are committed to doing whilst also fixing some of the issues which opposition [councillors] have highlighted.
“The world is changing, innovation is coming upon us and we cannot let Birmingham be left behind.”
She added that having a Labour government working with the council would “make a difference” when it came to tackling some of the city’s most pressing issues compared to the previous 13 years.
Birmingham City Council also has plans to transform its waste collection service in a bid to boost the efficiency and reliability of bin collections.
But the bins strike dispute between itself and Unite the union remains unresolved, with striking workers raising concerns about pay while the council’s leadership has repeatedly insisted that a “fair and reasonable” offer has been made.
The all-out citywide strike has been running since March and has attracted unwanted headlines from across the world, with tales of ‘cat-sized rats’ and rubbish mountains making headlines.