Indian engineering manager Abheer was in the middle of a performance review cycle when he was suddenly laid off from his job at Google - victim of a wave of industry-wide cutbacks.
"Everything was going fine," said Abheer, 31, who asked to use a pseudonym to protect his identity. "I know a few people who actually got promoted in October and (then) they were laid off ... there's no kind of foresight that this is coming."
The wave of tech layoffs in the United States at companies including Meta Platforms Inc, Google and Amazon are upending the lives of foreign workers like Abheer who are in the country on H-1B visas reserved for "high skilled" occupations.
Under the terms of their visas, workers who are laid off face the prospect of having to leave the country in 60 days unless they can find another job or manage to change their immigration status.
Indians represented about 75% of approved special visa holder petitions in 2021, according to the US government, and industry estimates suggest they account for about a third of the roughly 200,000 tech jobs lost in the United States over the last year.
As a result, thousands of Indian workers have seen their lives turned upside down in recent months.
TICKING CLOCK
US Citizenship and Immigration Services approved about 407,000 H-1B visa petitions in 2021, the last year for which a detailed data report was available.
For many of the Indians who secured them, the current wave of job cuts could be their first experience of being laid off since they arrived in the United States, said Khanderao Kand, founder of the Global Indian Technology Professionals Association (GITPRO), a worldwide networking group.
He said people looking for help are often in a state of panic as they face a frantic search for a new job against a ticking clock. Other options, such as filing for a student visa or a visa for spouses of H-1B holders, might allow them to stay in the United States - at least temporarily - but would not give them the right to work, Kand said.
The Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora Studies (FIIDS), a nonprofit, is among the groups lobbying the U.S. government to extend the grace period for laid-off employees beyond 60 days.
Some people say the current deadline puts migrant workers at risk of labor abuses by unscrupulous bosses aware of their precarious immigration status - for example, offering less money or a more junior role than a person might otherwise command.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, a former engineering director at Google who was recently laid off said there are also significant restrictions for people on L-1 visas.
Those permits are generally granted to people in managerial or executive roles or whose jobs require specialized knowledge.
In contrast to H-1B holders, who can seek a job with another company if they are laid off, people on L-1 visas represent intracompany transfers to the United States.
"L-1 visas are lot more restrictive because you're confined to a very specific role and you can only be in that box," the former engineering director said.
"You might be missing out on promotions, benefits, on (compensation). But you don't really have an equal right to protest because then your visa is in a very risky situation."
LACKING OPTIONS
Even immigrants who have survived the recent wave of layoffs can be affected if their job status or salary is downgraded as part of corporate cost-cutting, labor specialists say.
For example, Google has said it is now pausing certain new labor certification applications, which can be part of immigrants' green card applications.
People in the United States on H-1Bs can extend beyond an initial six-year time frame - three years plus a three-year extension - if a green card application has been filed, said Tahmina Watson, a Seattle-based immigration lawyer.
"It will depend on which part of the process is being paused," Watson said. "Because these people who are at the cusp of their six years are really going to suffer."
A Google spokesperson said the company decided to pause new applications in light of the tech industry's staffing reductions and that the move would not affect current or future applications for other visa types.
"A lot of the income that I or anyone creates as an immigrant from their job ... goes back into either paying back our parents because they had saved for (college) education or paying back the loans that we have taken," Gupta said.
Such factors further compound the stress of the looming two-month deadline if they find themselves out of a job.
"It's about what that 60 days actually entails both mentally, emotionally, and also financially," she said. "Because each moment is literally like OK, we're losing a day."
FUGITIVE businessman Nirav Modi, who has been in a UK prison for more than six years, has told a court there will be “sensational developments” when his extradition case to India resumes next month.
The 54-year-old appeared before High Court Judge Simon Tinkler at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Friday in an unrelated civil case involving an unpaid loan of over USD 8 million to the Bank of India.
The judge rejected Modi’s request to delay the case on technical and medical grounds raised from prison. The matter is set to go to trial in January 2026.
“They (Bank of India) refer to my extradition… I'm still here. There will be some sensational developments, and I have never used these words before,” Modi said during a pre-trial review hearing.
Modi, wanted in India in connection with the estimated USD 2 billion Punjab National Bank fraud case, told the court he was “extremely hopeful” of being discharged or granted bail after the court agreed to consider new evidence despite what he called a “high bar”.
The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that Modi “has lodged an application to reopen his (extradition) appeal”, with Indian authorities having already filed their response. The hearing is expected to take place towards the end of November.
Representing himself as a “litigant in person”, Modi read from handwritten notes as he addressed the judge. Prison officers stood nearby as he spoke about difficulties with his eyesight and delays in accessing a computer while in custody, which he said made the legal process unfair.
“I understand this is an adversarial process and they (Bank of India) can say anything against me. But they keep on making assumptions; I would say, spend one day in prison… there needs to be some basic common sense,” he said, appearing agitated during the hearing.
The Bank of India, represented by barrister Tom Beasley and RWK Goodman’s Milan Kapadia, is pursuing Modi’s personal guarantee related to a loan to Dubai-based Firestar Diamond FZE. They said that delaying the proceedings would be unfair as it would indefinitely postpone the bank’s claim.
“If he is extradited, he will likely remain in custody… He will also be in a different time zone,” Beasley told the court, adding that the bank “remains sceptical” about Modi’s “claimed lack of funds”.
Justice Tinkler ruled that maintaining the court timetable outweighed other factors and said that reasonable measures were being taken to ensure fairness in the case.
“It is clear that some (medical) issues do affect his ability to work and will, in all likelihood, affect his ability to participate in the trial without reasonable adjustments being made,” the judge said, referring to a confidential medical report.
He said the seven-day trial scheduled for January would allow enough time to accommodate Modi’s medical needs. The court was also informed that prison authorities would provide him with a computer within a week, and hard copies of legal documents would be sent before another pre-trial hearing in early December.
Modi’s in-person appearance followed a “production order” from the court, which led to logistical issues over his return to custody. He was moved from HMP Thameside in south London, where he has been held, to HMP Pentonville in north London.
The businessman requested that the court note his preference for a single cell, but the judge said this was beyond the court’s jurisdiction. However, the judge directed that all his papers be transferred with him or that he be returned to Thameside soon.
Modi has been in prison since his arrest in March 2019 and has repeatedly been denied bail on grounds that he poses a flight risk, most recently in May this year.
He faces three criminal cases in India: one by the Central Bureau of Investigation related to the PNB fraud, another by the Enforcement Directorate over alleged money laundering, and a third for alleged interference with witnesses and evidence.
In April 2021, then UK Home Secretary Priti Patel ordered his extradition after a prima facie case was established. Modi had exhausted all legal challenges until his recent application to reopen the appeal was accepted. The case is set to be heard next month.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.