Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Gandhi ‘evolved as a person with the years’

By Amit Roy

THE Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement didn’t exactly win friends in the Indian community by daubing the word “racist” on the pedestal steps of Mahatma Gandhi’s statue in Parlia­ment Square and flicking white paint on the bronze. In fact, quite the opposite.


I have not heard of a single black leader who has offered an apology for this outrage.

Those who attacked Gandhi, arguably the greatest human being of the 20th century, should also by the same logic desecrate the monuments of Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jnr, because they proudly proclaimed they were his followers and inspired by his example.

Mandela wrote an essay, The Sacred Warrior, which historically curious BLM activists should read. “There are those who believe he was di­vinely inspired, and it is difficult not to believe with them,” he wrote.

King, who visited India in 1959, said: “I came to see for the first time that the Christian doc­trine of love operating through the Gandhian method of non-violence was one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom.”

Even General Jan Smuts, the South African leader who repeatedly clashed with Gandhi, de­veloped respect and admiration for his Indian adversary. Incidentally, Smuts, too, merits a statue in Parliament Square.

And of Gandhi, Albert Einstein observed: “Generations to come, it may well be, will scarce believe that such a man as this one ever in flesh and blood walked upon this Earth.”

There are malcontents and warped people in every society, some of whom have started a per­verse petition calling for the removal of Gandhi’s statue in Leicester.

Gandhi had no more scathing critic than him­self, all laid out in An Autobiography: The story of My Experiments with Truth. He evolved as a person with the years. If anything, his lessons in non-violence are needed today more than ever. It is worth emphasising he was assassinated be­cause his critics accused him of being a Hindu who was too soft with India’s Muslims.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep ReadingShow less