Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Gandhi ‘evolved as a person with the years’

By Amit Roy

THE Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement didn’t exactly win friends in the Indian community by daubing the word “racist” on the pedestal steps of Mahatma Gandhi’s statue in Parlia­ment Square and flicking white paint on the bronze. In fact, quite the opposite.


I have not heard of a single black leader who has offered an apology for this outrage.

Those who attacked Gandhi, arguably the greatest human being of the 20th century, should also by the same logic desecrate the monuments of Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jnr, because they proudly proclaimed they were his followers and inspired by his example.

Mandela wrote an essay, The Sacred Warrior, which historically curious BLM activists should read. “There are those who believe he was di­vinely inspired, and it is difficult not to believe with them,” he wrote.

King, who visited India in 1959, said: “I came to see for the first time that the Christian doc­trine of love operating through the Gandhian method of non-violence was one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom.”

Even General Jan Smuts, the South African leader who repeatedly clashed with Gandhi, de­veloped respect and admiration for his Indian adversary. Incidentally, Smuts, too, merits a statue in Parliament Square.

And of Gandhi, Albert Einstein observed: “Generations to come, it may well be, will scarce believe that such a man as this one ever in flesh and blood walked upon this Earth.”

There are malcontents and warped people in every society, some of whom have started a per­verse petition calling for the removal of Gandhi’s statue in Leicester.

Gandhi had no more scathing critic than him­self, all laid out in An Autobiography: The story of My Experiments with Truth. He evolved as a person with the years. If anything, his lessons in non-violence are needed today more than ever. It is worth emphasising he was assassinated be­cause his critics accused him of being a Hindu who was too soft with India’s Muslims.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Small boats

By far the biggest losers from this Labour government’s choices are recently recognised refugees.

Getty Images

Hidden refugee U-turn means settlement changes fail the cohesion test

Immigration has been the most polarising issue of our age. Yet it was settlement policy - the immigration of the recent past – that caused the first public rifts in Andy Burnham’s government. The prime minister inherited a stand-off: how far was it fair to change the rules for those who had come to Britain, in record numbers, over the past five years?

No flagship government policy for decades has changed so much after consultation. Cue fierce political arguments about why. Right-wing opposition parties depicted home secretary Shabana Mahmood as the only Labour voice willing to get a grip – before being forced to back down by soft-headed pro-migration colleagues. The centre-left critique was that the government had picked a damaging fight with its own side when it would never be able to satisfy hardline demands to send the so-called ‘Boriswave’ home.

Keep ReadingShow less