Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

England players had no role in Pakistan pullout decision

ENGLAND cricketers had no role in the team's decision to abandon their tour of Pakistan next month, the players' union has said.

New Zealand returned home from Pakistan after abruptly abandoning their tour minutes before the opening fixture in Rawalpindi, citing a security alert from their government.


England followed suit this week, calling off their men's and women's teams tour of Pakistan, citing players' "mental and physical well-being".

Team England Player Partnership (TEPP), which represents England's international players, said the cricketers were not asked for input.

"At no stage did TEPP inform the ECB that the players would not be touring," TEPP chair Richard Bevan told website ESPNcricinfo in an article published on Friday.

"At no stage has the ECB ever asked TEPP or the teams, men and women, whether the tour should go ahead or whether players were prepared to tour Pakistan.

"It is 100 per cent incorrect to suggest TEPP intervened to say the players would not tour."

Pakistan was shunned by other cricketing nations for almost a decade after the deadly 2009 attack on the Sri Lanka team bus in Lahore but has recently been wooing back top international sides.

The England teams were each scheduled to play two Twenty20 international matches on Oct. 13 and 14 in Rawalpindi, with the women's side due to stay on for a three-match one-day international series from Oct. 17-21.

Former players have criticised the England and Wales Cricket Board's decision.

"English cricket, the governing body and players, had a chance to do the right thing this week," former England captain Michael Atherton wrote in The Times.

"They had a chance to repay a debt, uphold their honour and side with a cricketing nation that has undergone the kind of challenges others cannot even begin to contemplate.

"Instead, citing a mealy-mouthed statement, they did the wrong thing."

(Reuters)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Banksy

The largest cost relates to a mural painted on the Royal Courts of Justice in London on September 8, 2025. The mural showed a judge in a wig battering a protester with his gavel.

Getty Images

Banksy artworks rack up almost £150,000 in public costs

THREE Banksy artworks have cost public bodies almost £150,000 in cleaning, security and other costs, with the bill expected to rise.

The largest cost relates to a mural painted on the Royal Courts of Justice in London on September 8, 2025. The Ministry of Justice has spent £50,000 trying to remove the paint, while a further £35,300 was spent on overtime and security. The spending was disclosed to the BBC through Freedom of Information requests.

Keep ReadingShow less