“Don’t let racists spoil the success of England Lions in bringing the country together”
Anti-racism pressure groups, think-tanks and MPs are urging everyone associated with professional football to build on the achievements of England during Euro 2020, in cementing better race-relations throughout the country.
During the past four weeks the English nation got behind its football team as it made history in reaching its first finals in the competition.
Not since the 1966 World Cup, and the only English football success, has the country had so much to celebrate.
“What we have to do is to remind ourselves of how positive the previous four weeks were,” said the chair of anti-racism charity, Kick It Out, Sanjay Bhandari.
“That Gareth Southgate is an incredible leader who has led a team with a band of brothers’ spirit that has lifted the spirits of the nation as we come out of lockdown,”
“They really get the importance of everyone feeling included, and that football, being a game for all, and this country has come together.”
The director of the British Future think-tank, Sunder Katwala, said it had been “brilliant month for England, for English football, and for Englishness”.
This team, he said, did more than just talk about being representative of the nation.
“Sport can often be powerful in a show not tell way,” he told Eastern Eye. “When you had the first black players in the team, and they fought the argument, it changed the idea of who could be English. You had the image of an inclusive Englishness.
“But what's been different in 2018, and 2021, is there's been a narrative and an articulation that goes with that, that you would associate with a civic society leader or a political leader.
“And it's been a football manager, and football players who've actually spoken up for a diverse and inclusive Englishness.”
Incredible experience
Manisha Tailor is the only south Asian, man or woman, in a full-time coaching role in any of the 92 clubs in English professional football, as the newly promoted assistant coach at Queens Park Rangers.
“The Euros have been an incredible experience, and they took us on a journey which was more than just about football,” she said.
“It brought people from the community together, for the love of the game. Even those who may not have watched football before were hooked, and this has been great to see.
“I think food and music is a big part of south Asian culture, and the tournament allowed for this to be infused with sport, showing what being English and living in England mean to different people.”
Manisha Tailor is a coach at QPR
In a news conference on Monday (12), Southgate praised his team and the fans who supported them.
“We have been a beacon of light in bringing people together, in people being able to relate to the national team, and the national team stands for everyone,” he told journalists.
“That togetherness has to continue, and we’ve shown the power our country has when it does come together and has that energy and positivity.”
Confident players
Katwala acknowledged that Southgate’s form of leadership gave his players confidence to speak out on things considered political in the past.
“They've led the country and provided the vision and version when everybody else has been silent on this point of what does England [and] needs to mean in the England of 2020.
“They're a very socially conscious generation. I think Raheem Sterling, Marcus Rashford, Jordan Henderson have shown that.
“It's a very young team, the average age is 25. They represent the shift in views of the 25-year-olds of England today that it's a more diverse group as a group more confident, comfortable, about diversity.
“They don't have to fight some of the battles that Cyril Regis, Luther Blissett and that first courageous generation of legends had to fight.
“They say, we will make new progress in our generation, the progress of the past is a foundation for battles to win today.”
Black and south Asian MPs have been quick to praise the England team and their head coach.
“As I posted on social media, we should be very, very proud of the achievements of Gareth Southgate and his wonderful team, they have been a class act throughout,” enthused the Labour MP for Slough, Tan Dhesi.
“Just because somebody has missed a penalty kick, or just because the team has narrowly missed out on creating history by winning the European Championship for the first time ever, it doesn't mean that those players have failed.
“They are heroes, and they should be regarded as such.”
The Labour MP for Brent Central Dawn Butler described it as a “fabulous four weeks”.
“The lads just made us so proud, and they the whole English team was phenomenal,” she said.
“They literally lifted the whole country out of depression, bought us hope at a time when we needed that more than ever.
“That hope didn't come from politics. It came from a football team, full of young lads and a great manager standing by what they believed in, social causes, justice and equality.”
Racist backlash
Hundreds of south Asians were at Wembley for the final, while tens of thousands watched it live on television, living every anxious moment.
BBC Radio Five Live’s Nihal Arthanayaka summed up many people’s thoughts with his Tweet, “I hated myself that my default setting was ‘I hope the black players don’t miss the penalties.’”
But immediately after the defeat, the three black players who missed their penalties faced racial abuse on social media.
“It's always there lurking in the background, and we always knew that if England missed out on penalties and a black player missed, it [racism] will come back online,” said Bhandari.
“But we also have to remember that online is a very different to the real world. There's clearly an element of the online abuse that is real people in this country who are Tweeting racist stuff.
“Our data from monitoring online abuse over the whole season, and previously, the vast majority of online abuse actually comes from overseas and comes from people who've never set foot inside an English football stadium.
“And you can't really call them fans, they're users of the platforms.”
Bukayo Saka is consoled by Gareth Southgate. (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)
Such is the difference from a generation ago that the second in line to the throne and FA president, Prince William, took to Twitter to condemn the racists.
He Tweeted that he was “sickened” by the abuse.
“It is totally unacceptable that players have to endure this abhorrent behaviour.
“It must stop now and all those involved should be held accountable.”
But only the social media companies can stop racist abuse online.
Over the past two years, sport stars, celebrities, and Prince William have periodically boycotted social media.
Boycott social media
Companies, like Twitter, have promised to clamp down on abuse, but critics say they are too slow to act, and the punishment meaningless.
Katwala suggests that if nothing changes, players should once again boycott social media on the first day of the new Premier League season next month.
“The FA should go in, studs up, and put the social media companies under pressure,” he said.
“They should use the first day of the football season in August to say to Twitter, to Facebook, whose side are you on? Are you on the side of anti-racism, or are you going to keep these pro-racism rules?
“There isn't enough punishment when there's racist abuse against players. Bans are voluntary. If you get banned from a platform you can come back on.
“If the social media companies want to be part of a healthy conversation, you've actually got to sit down with the players, listen to the players and make some changes.”
Incoming FA chair Debbie Hewitt. Sunder Katwala has urged the FA to go "studs up" to tackle racism (PIC credit: FA)
He is backed by the Labour MP for Perry Barr, Khalid Mahmood.
“All social media platforms have a responsibility, and they've got to engage forcefully with anybody who generates hate campaigns.
“You can't do it on the street, but just by putting on social media and getting away with it isn’t right.
“You shouldn’t be allowed to get away with racial abuse.”
The Labour MP for Brent Central, Dawn Butler, said social media platforms needed to be held accountable for their inaction.
“Find ways that affects their pockets, not something that they can just easily dismiss, and use racism as clickbait to enhance their money-making model.
“At the end of the day, social media platforms make money from clickbait, and we've got to, we've got to change that, and it's not just racism, it's homophobia.”
United front
The chair of Kick It Out, Sanjay Bhandari, said the approach to tackling online abuse was “fragmented”.
He urged the FA, Premier League, English Football League, and the Professional Footballers’ Association to “remain engaged” in tackling racism in the sport.
“Part of the challenge is you have to figure out who's actually got jurisdiction.
“All of those governing bodies, we want them to remain as energetic and as involved as they have been, and they're engaged with it.
“So, for the last year or so the, the public statements of support have been really good in supporting the players in what they wanted to do around making protests and we want to see that continue.
“We worked well together as a unified team, around the social media boycott.
“We need more of the teamwork across football and working together.”
Southgate condemned the racism as “unforgivable”.
Political fallout
In a briefing on Monday (12), the prime minister, Boris Johnson said, “Shame on you, and I hope you will crawl back under the rock from which you emerged."
But his comments were criticised by the former Manchester United and England right-back, Gary Neville.
Gary Neville (Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images)
He told Sky News, “He [the prime minister] said Muslim women look like letter boxes. Honestly, Gareth Southgate and Boris Johnson are poles apart.”
The home secretary, Priti Patel, also joined in the criticism of racist attacks aimed at England’s black players.
“I am disgusted that @England players who have given so much for our country this summer have been subject to vile racist abuse on social media,” she Tweeted.
“It has no place in our country and I back the police to hold those responsible accountable.”
But Aston Villa’s and England’s Tyrone Mings took to Twitter to slate Patel.
“You don’t get to stoke the fire at the beginning of the tournament by labelling our anti-racism message as ‘Gesture Politics’ & then pretend to be disgusted when the very thing we’re campaigning against, happens.
Dog whistle politics
That sense of outrage was echoed by Dhesi, who described the prime minister’s condemnation as “hypocritical” because he had not supported players who took a knee.
“Ministers need to be called out, because some of this dog whistle politics when individuals, like the prime minister, like the home secretary, had been engaged in saying that they will not condemn those who are booing the English players when they are taking the knee.
“Those guys were taking the knee in order to make a stand against racism.
“Racism should be condemned by all, instead the likes of the prime minister and some of his Conservative ministers, described that as gesture politics.
“So, is it any wonder that when dogs eventually start to bark, that we should not be surprised?”
But it is not just opposition MPs who have criticised Patel.
The former chair of her party, Lady Sayeeda Warsi, Tweeted her disgust.
“It’s time to stop the culture wars that are feeding division,” she wrote.
Manisha Tailor told Eastern Eye that she was saddened that some players had been subjected “to such hurt and vile abuse for simply representing their country”.
Yet she said the Euros had given her hope.
“My mentors had already empowered to be resilient, to have the courage to persist and to find different ways of learning.
“This in essence has helped me to problem solve, manage how I feel and find solutions.
“The atmosphere created as a result of the tournament has added to this and has left me feeling even more inspired to be part of what England means to us, an all-inclusive England and continuing this journey for change.”
A CONVICTED child sex offender from Pakistan has successfully challenged government attempts to send him back to his homeland, claiming he faces danger because his criminal acts became public there.
Jamil Ahmed, 48, persuaded immigration judges that deporting him would breach his human rights after newspapers in Pakistan reportedly covered his convictions for abusing teenage girls in Scotland, reported The Times.
The case highlighted ongoing legal complexities surrounding the removal of foreign nationals who have committed serious crimes in Britain.
Ahmed first faced justice in 2008 when courts found him guilty of unlawful sexual activity with a girl aged between 13 and 16. He received a three-year probation order and was ordered to complete 240 hours of unpaid work.
Five years later, he appeared in court again on similar charges involving another teenager. This time, magistrates sentenced him to three years and six months in prison and placed him permanently on the sex offenders register.
Following his second conviction, immigration officials issued a deportation order. However, Ahmed has spent nearly ten years fighting through the courts to remain in Britain, losing two previous appeals but never actually being removed.
At his latest tribunal hearing in Edinburgh, Ahmed's representatives argued that media coverage of his crimes had reached Pakistan through various publications, including the Daily Kashmir News.
The tribunal judgment said, "Ahmed asserts that he has a well-founded fear of persecution and is at risk of suffering serious harm in Pakistan because knowledge of his crimes have become known in Pakistan and published in newspapers."
He further claimed that local authorities in Pakistan had opened an investigation based on his convictions, and that religious leaders had issued a fatwa against him. He alleged that extremists were distributing leaflets containing his photograph and that armed men had visited his family home searching for him. Tragically, he said his father was subsequently shot dead.
The Home Office challenged the authenticity of the alleged Pakistani newspaper reports during proceedings.
Ahmed called Pakistani legal expert Asad Ali Khan to testify about the newspaper coverage, but the 2024 hearing judge dismissed this evidence, leading to Ahmed's initial defeat.
However, the Upper Tribunal ruled that the previous judge had made legal errors by failing to properly consider the expert testimony and other key evidence.
Judge Jeremy Rintoul concluded, "I consider that, cumulatively, the judge has failed to reach sustainable conclusions with respect to the documents, the wife's evidence and the expert's opinion."
Ahmed, who is married with children and continues living in Scotland, will now face a fresh hearing to determine his immigration status, the newspaper report added.
Bertrice Pompe (CL) and Bernadette Dugasse (CR), who were both born on Diego Garcia, speak outside High Court following their campaign's failed bid to prevent Britain transferring ownership of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, on May 22, 2025 in London.
A BRITISH court on Thursday cleared the way for the government to proceed with a deal to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, lifting a temporary injunction that had blocked the signing of the agreement.
The deal would involve the UK transferring the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius and paying to lease the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island in the territory.
Prime minister Keir Starmer was scheduled to finalise the agreement in a virtual signing ceremony with Mauritian representatives on Thursday. However, a last-minute injunction granted to two Chagossian women by London's High Court delayed the process.
The injunction, granted early Thursday morning, temporarily blocked the deal, leading to criticism of the government. At a 10:30am hearing, Judge Martin Chamberlain lifted the ban, stating that extending it could harm the UK’s national and public interest. He added that any further legal challenges must be brought before the Court of Appeal.
“We welcome the judge's ruling today,” a government spokesperson said.
The opposition Conservatives criticised the proposed agreement. “You’re seeing British sovereign territory being given away to an ally of China, and billions of pounds of British taxpayers’ money being spent for the privilege,” said Conservative MP Robert Jenrick. “This was always a bad deal,” he added.
Earlier, the two Chagossian women, Bernadette Dugasse and Bertrice Pompe, had sought the injunction after a leaked newspaper report on Wednesday night indicated that the deal was set to be announced.
Outside the court, about 50 protesters gathered. The women's lawyer, Philip Rule, said the government was acting “unlawfully” and argued that Thursday could be the court’s last chance to intervene.
Starmer has said Britain’s ownership of the Chagos Islands has been questioned by international legal rulings and that an agreement with Mauritius is the only way to ensure the base remains operational.
The base on Diego Garcia is leased to the United States and is considered a key military facility in the Asia-Pacific, having been used during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ahead of the court’s ruling, a government spokesperson told AFP, “The deal is the right thing to protect the British people and our national security.”
The Conservative Party called the agreement a “sellout for British interests”.
Britain retained the Chagos Islands after Mauritius became independent in the 1960s. Thousands of Chagossian residents were later removed from the islands and have pursued legal claims for compensation.
In 2019, the International Court of Justice recommended that the UK return the islands to Mauritius following decades of legal disputes.
Under the proposed deal, the UK would obtain a 99-year lease for the base, with the option to renew. The government has not disclosed the cost but has not denied reports of a £90 million annual fee.
Mauritian prime minister Navin Ramgoolam has said Mauritius would continue to pursue full sovereignty over the islands if the United States did not support the agreement.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Salal Dam on the Chenab, the first hydropower project under the Indus Water Treaty
INDIA is considering plans to dramatically increase the amount of water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action for the deadly April attack on tourists that New Delhi blames on Islamabad, according to four people familiar with the matter.
Delhi “put in abeyance” its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, which governs the use of the Indus river system, shortly after 26 civilians were killed in Indian Kashmir in what India described as an act of terror. Pakistan has denied any involvement, but the accord has not been revived, despite both countries agreeing to a ceasefire last week.
After suspending India’s participation in the treaty, India’s prime minister Narendra Modi ordered officials to expedite planning and execution of projects on the Chenab, Jhelum and Indus rivers, three bodies of water in the Indus system that are designated primarily for Pakistan’s use, six people told Reuters.
One of the key plans under discussion involves doubling the length of the Ranbir canal on the Chenab to 120 km, according to two of the sources. The canal, which runs through India to Pakistan’s agricultural heartland of Punjab, was built in the 19th century, long before the treaty was signed.
India is permitted to draw a limited amount of water from the Chenab for irrigation, but an expanded canal – which experts said could take years to construct – would allow it to divert 150 cubic meters of water per second, up from about 40 cubic meters currently, the four people said, citing official discussions and documents they had seen.
Details of the Indian government’s deliberations on expanding Ranbir have not previously been reported. The discussions started last month and continue even after the ceasefire, one of the people said.
The Indian ministries responsible for water and foreign affairs, as well as Modi’s office, did not respond to Reuters’ questions. Indian hydropower giant NHPC, which operates many projects in the Indus system, also did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Modi said in a fiery speech this week that “water and blood cannot flow together,” though he didn’t refer to the treaty. Water minister CR Paatil told a media event last Friday (16) that his ministry would “implement what prime minister Modi says” and “try to ensure that not a drop of water goes out.”
The water and foreign ministries of Pakistan did not respond to requests for comment. Foreign minister Ishaq Dar told lawmakers last week that the government had written to India arguing that suspending the treaty was unlawful and that Islamabad regarded it as remaining in force.
A dry stretch of the Indus River in Pakistan’s Jamshoro and Kotri districts earlier this month
Islamabad said after India suspended the treaty in April that it considered “any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan” to be an “act of war.” About 80 per cent of Pakistani farms depend on the Indus system, as do nearly all hydropower projects serving the country of some 250 million.
Any efforts by Delhi to build dams, canals or other infrastructure that would withhold or divert significant amount of flow from the Indus system to India “would take years to realize,” said water security expert David Michel of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
International relations expert Happymon Jacob at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University said that India’s new focus on the Indus Waters Treaty reflected an attempt to pressure Pakistan over Kashmir.
“With the latest conflict, Delhi may refuse to discuss Kashmir with Pakistan in any format,” he said. “Delhi has not only progressively narrowed the scope of bilateral talks but has also curtailed the agenda, focusing only on specific issues like the IWT.”
Pakistan said it is preparing legal action in several international forums, including the World Bank, which facilitated the treaty, as well as the Permanent Court of Arbitration or the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
“Water should not be weaponised,” Pakistan’s finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told Reuters on Monday. “We don’t even want to consider any scenario which... does not take into account the reinstatement of this treaty.”
The Indus system runs through some of the world’s most geopolitically tense areas, originating near Lake Mansarovar in Tibet and snaking through India’s north and Pakistan’s east and southeast, before emptying into the Arabian Sea.
The treaty is widely seen as one of the world’s most successful water-sharing accords, having survived several major wars and longstanding tensions between India and Pakistan.
Islamabad has previously opposed many Indian projects in the Indus system, while Delhi said after the Kashmir attack that it had been trying to renegotiate the treaty since 2023 to account for population increases and its rising need for clean hydroenergy.
The treaty restricts India largely to setting up low-impact hydropower projects on the three rivers allocated to Pakistan. Delhi has freedom to utilise the waters of three other rivers – the Sutlej, Beas and Ravi tributaries – as it sees fit.
Delhi has also created a list of hydropower projects in its Jammu and Kashmir territory that it hopes will expand capacity to 12,000 megawatts, up from the current 3,360 MW.
The list, which was created by the power ministry and seen by Reuters, was not dated. A person familiar with the document said it was created before the Kashmir incident but is actively being discussed by government officials.
The prospective projects also include dams that can store large volumes of water, in what would be a first for India in the Indus river system, according to two people familiar with the matter. India has identified at least five possible storage projects, four of which are on tributaries of the Chenab and Jhelum, according to the power ministry document. (Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, expressed his fury after witnessing a major accident during the launch of the latest North Korean warship, on Thursday. Kim considers this malfunction in the mechanism of the warship as a shame to the nation’s prestige.
As per Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), parts of the 5,000 ton destroyer’s bottom was damaged, and went off-balance as it eased into water during the launch. Parts of the destroyer’s hull was crushed, leaving the bow stranded on the shipway.
No casualties or injuries were reported after the incident.
The mishap took place in Kim’s presence, along with a large crowd from northeastern part of Chongjin, which added to his humiliation. He commented the accident as “criminal act”, and “carelessness”, from those in charge. He declared that those involved with the error will be held responsible and punished.
Multiple state institutions are considered responsible the accident – including the Munitions Industry Department, Kim Chaek University of Technology and the central ship design bureau.
Yang Wuk, an Asan Institute for Policy Studies military expert commented on the failed launch of the warship, embarrassing for the country.
According to a South Korean military analysis, the damaged warship is on their side in the water. The South Korean military spokesperson, Lee said that he expected the damaged destroyer to be equipped like the Choe Hyon.
“If the ship does not move together, the stresses will tear the hull apart,” said Sal Mercogliano, Professor at Campbell University and a maritime expert.
North Korea lacks floating docks usually found in shipbuilding states. Therefore, "Pushing from the side is the most basic, simplest and cheapest, if done right,” said Chol Il, retired South Korean submarine commander.
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces. Therefore, he ordered for the destroyer to be restored before the late June plenary session of the ruling Worker’s Party.
Keep ReadingShow less
The recall also sheds light on the ongoing debate around raw milk consumption
A milk product sold in Northern Ireland has been urgently recalled due to fears of contamination with a potentially deadly strain of E. coli bacteria. Kenneth Hanna's Farm Shop has issued a recall for its Ken's Raw Jersey Milk following the possible detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), a dangerous form of the bacteria.
The recall applies to all batch codes and use-by dates of the two-litre bottles sold in Northern Ireland. Consumers have been advised not to consume the product. Instead, the milk should either be returned to the place of purchase or safely disposed of.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has issued a public health warning, stating: “The possible presence of STEC in this product. Symptoms caused by STEC organisms include severe diarrhoea (including bloody diarrhoea), abdominal pain, and sometimes haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), a serious condition that can lead to kidney failure and can be fatal.”
STEC is a specific strain of E. coli that produces Shiga toxins, which are capable of causing serious illness. One of the most recognised strains is E. coli O157:H7, commonly linked to foodborne outbreaks associated with undercooked meat, unwashed produce, and unpasteurised dairy products.
Symptoms of an STEC infection typically develop within three to four days of exposure but can appear anytime between one and ten days. They include stomach cramps, diarrhoea—often bloody—and in some cases, fever. These symptoms may last for up to two weeks. While many recover without complications, the infection can result in severe outcomes in certain individuals.
One of the most serious complications is haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), which affects approximately 5 to 10 percent of STEC cases. HUS primarily impacts young children and the elderly, and symptoms include reduced urination, pale skin, fatigue, swelling, and unexplained bruising. In severe cases, the condition can lead to kidney failure and, in rare instances, death.
The FSA has advised anyone experiencing these symptoms to stay at home and avoid attending work, school, or nursery until they have been symptom-free for at least 48 hours to minimise the risk of spreading the infection.
The recall also sheds light on the ongoing debate around raw milk consumption. Ken's Raw Jersey Milk is an unpasteurised product, meaning it has not undergone the heat treatment process used to eliminate harmful bacteria. While supporters of raw milk claim it offers health benefits such as improved digestion and a richer nutrient profile, health authorities continue to warn of the risks associated with its consumption.
Raw milk can carry pathogens including E. coli, STEC, Listeria, and Salmonella. These bacteria are typically destroyed during pasteurisation, a process not applied to raw milk products.
This incident serves as a reminder of the potential dangers of consuming unpasteurised dairy. The FSA continues to monitor the situation, and consumers in Northern Ireland are urged to heed the recall notice and take appropriate safety precautions.
For further updates or health advice, consumers are encouraged to consult the FSA’s official website or contact their healthcare provider if symptoms appear.