Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Church of England to review monuments across places of worship to probe links to slavery, colonialism

THE Church of England on Tuesday (11) outlined a review of monuments across its thousands of places of worship to examine if they honour slavery and colonialism, indicating some may be removed.

The Anglican Church published new guidelines for its parishes and cathedrals in the latest step of a consultation launched during the Black Lives Matter protests last year.


The movement followed the death of George Floyd in US police custody in May 2020 and saw a statue of Edward Colston, a 17th century slave trader, dumped in Bristol harbour in western England.

Subsequently, Bristol Cathedral removed a stained glass window that had been dedicated to Colston.

The British government is pressing ahead with contentious legislation to toughen jail terms for vandalism of historical artefacts, and the Church of England said it did not condone such direct action.

Parishes may opt to remove items featuring "contested heritage", but may opt also to relocate them or attach educational material to explain their context better, according to the new guidelines.

They may also decide no change is needed to contentious monuments, but this should not be taken as "inertia" and the reasons should be communicated, the guidelines stated.

The idea was to ensure 'a welcoming and inclusive Church today' for minorities, the CoE's director of churches and cathedrals Becky Clark said in a statement.

"The issues of contested heritage require us honestly and openly to discuss ways in which our buildings can demonstrate our commitment to social and racial justice as a reflection of our faith in Jesus Christ," she said.

The state-backed CoE manages more than 16,000 church buildings and 42 cathedrals across England. Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby is the senior cleric for the worldwide Anglican communion, including in Africa and the US.

The dean of Bristol Cathedral, Mandy Ford, said the review was intended "not to obliterate history, but to restore and repair our relationships with those whose history is not yet expressed in our buildings".

"As we seek to find ways to honour those whose stories are untold and to give voice to communities that have suffered injustice, this guidance will be invaluable," she said.

More For You

 social-media-ban

Generation Z in India leads all countries surveyed in backing a ban

iStock

Majority of Indian parents 'support social media ban for under-16s'

  • Indian parents rank second globally in support for a social media ban for under-16s, at 75 per cent— behind only Malaysia (77 per cent)
  • Generation Z in India leads all countries surveyed in backing a ban, at 73 per cent, against a global average of 51 per cent
  • Parents and under-18s are 23 points apart globally on support for a ban (60 per cent vs 37 per cent)

PARENTS in India have recorded the second-highest level of support for a social media ban for under-16s, at 75 per cent, behind only Malaysia (77 per cent), according to new research published by the UK-based education charity, Varkey Foundation.

The Family First report follows Australia's introduction of a social media ban for under-16s, as other countries consider similar measures.

Keep ReadingShow less