Britain should not offer preferential access to European Union workers over those from outside the bloc after Brexit, a government-commissioned report said on Tuesday (18).
The independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) said decisions on who could work in Britain once it abolishes free movement with the EU should focus on attracting highly skilled people.
Prime minister Theresa May has indicated she is open to such an idea, with reports suggesting an announcement could come at her Conservative party’s conference this month.
However, it could cause problems in Brexit negotiations with the EU. Britain’s hopes for a close trading relationship with the bloc are likely to be linked to demands for preferential access for EU workers in the UK.
The committee said that if immigration was not part of the Brexit talks, “we recommend moving to a system in which all migration is managed with no preferential access to EU citizens”.
Future policy “should favour high-skilled workers, as there is clear evidence they bring benefits to the UK’s public finances, innovation and productivity”.
The committee recommended removing a cap on the number of non-EU high-skilled workers allowed in each year and expanding it to include more skills.
By contrast, it concluded there is no need for a specific route for low-skilled workers to come to Britain, with the exception of seasonal agricultural labour.
It conceded this could hit sectors that have grown quickly in recent years on the back of cheap labour, such as food production.
The government commissioned the re-port last year to inform its future policy on immigration, a key issue with voters in the 2016 Brexit referendum, and is expected to publish plans later this year.
In an interview with the BBC broadcast late on Monday (17), May suggested she wanted to give EU and non-EU workers the same rights to work in Britain.
“The message from the British people is very simple, it was they don’t want a situa-tion where they could see people coming from the EU having... automatic rights in terms of coming here to the UK and a set of rules for people from outside the EU,” she said.
But London mayor Sadiq Khan warned the report was a “missed opportunity” to protect jobs.
“British businesses will pay a heavy price if the government fails to protect their access to a European workforce at all skill levels in the future,” he said.
Around 226,000 EU citizens came to Britain in the year ending March 2018, with 138,000 leaving, official figures show. Non-EU immigration stood at 316,000, with around 81,000 leaving. The Home Office said on Tuesday that the government wanted EU citizens to continue to play a positive role in Britain.
“We will carefully consider the Migration Advisory Committee’s recommendations before setting out further detail on the UK’s future immigration system,” a spokeswoman for the Home Office said.
“EU citizens play an important and positive role in our economy and society and we want that to continue after we leave.”
TikTok is to lay off hundreds of employees from its London office, with the bulk of the cuts affecting content moderation and security teams, according to reports estimating over 400 job losses by the Communication Workers Union. Online safety campaigners, along with TUC and CWU leaders, have urged Chair Chi Onwurah MP to investigate the impact of TikTok’s actions on UK online safety and workers’ rights.
The strategic shift is part of a broader reorganisation of TikTok's global trust and safety operations, aiming to streamline processes and concentrate operations in fewer locations worldwide. The move has prompted significant criticism from safety advocates and politicians, raising concerns about the platform's commitment to child protection and online safety.
Safety roles cut
People working in the trust and safety team are most likely to lose their jobs as part of a global restructuring that prioritises AI- assisted moderation over human oversight. TikTok is moving UK content moderation roles to Europe as it rely on AI, putting hundreds of jobs at risk despite rising regulatory pressure under the Online Safety Act.
The timing is particularly controversial given recent revelations about platform safety failures. Report from Global Witness, a not-for-profit organisation have accused TikTok of "sacrificing online safety" through these AI-driven cuts, with investigations revealing that the algorithm has directed minors toward explicit content a serious breach of child protection standards.
The Communication Workers Union and online safety professionals have urged UK MPs to investigate the restructuring, warning that job losses could expose children to harmful material. The cuts represent a fundamental shift in TikTok's operational philosophy, prioritizing cost efficiency over comprehensive content review.
TikTok's restructuring putting several hundred jobs at risk marks a significant move as it shifts to AI-assisted content moderation. While the platform claims the changes will improve efficiency, the decision has sparked debate about whether algorithmic moderation adequately protects vulnerable users. As regulators scrutinise social media platforms increasingly, TikTok's focus on automation rather than human expertise may face mounting political and regulatory challenges in the UK and beyond.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.