Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Brexit FAQs explained

By Amit Roy

THERE is nothing permanent about Brexit. If it doesn’t work, a future generation can always ap­ply to rejoin the club. What Grou­cho Marx meant to say was, “I re­fuse to be kept out of any club that won’t have me as a member.”


Also, there have been so many deadlines and cliffhangers, there is no reason to think the UK and the European Union won’t continue to negotiate well into 2021 and be­yond. The rules of engagement be­tween the UK and the EU will con­tinue to be adjusted and finessed so that the damage caused by Brexit is reduced as far as is possible.

Meanwhile, for Eastern Eye read­ers, here are some thoughts for fur­ther discussion.

Is there anything good about leaving the EU?

In a negative way, yes. Previously, anyone from Europe could enter Britain, no questions asked. Now they can be treated just as badly as any­one from India or Pakistan.

Will there really be a level-playing field after Brexit?

Of course not. Spain is almost a second home to millions of Brits – between 800,000 and one million Britons own a property there. More important, the upper and middle classes have homes in France – it is reckoned between 150,000 and 300,000 of them live in France.

In theory, the new immigration rules will treat everyone equally once freedom of movement stops on December 31. In practice, a way will be found to circumvent the new restrictions, not least because the Spanish economy depends on Brit­ish holidaymakers looking for fish and chips and cheap alcohol in a sunny climate.

Will Britain flourish outside the EU?

It is not immediately apparent how leaving the world’s biggest trading bloc is a good thing. But neither is the EU’s Common Agricultural Pol­icy which pays farmers, especially in France, to produce surplus food which cannot even be given away to the world’s poor.

Britain is clearly in for a rough ride over the next few years. But (UK chancellor) Rishi Sunak thinks Britain will do better outside the UK – and he is a supposed to be a clever chap. How long the slump lasts is anybody’s guess.

In that case, was it really such a good idea to leave?

The answer to this is both yes and no. The British were determined to join, not necessarily because they were keen on membership, but be­cause their pride was hurt when General Charles de Gaulle of France vetoed the UK’s application in 1963. After a referendum in 1975, with a 67 per cent vote in favour, the UK joined the Common Market.

Sadly, this was not a marriage made in heaven. The referendum of 2016 split the country – 51.89 per cent for Leave to 48.11 per cent for Re­main, so 17,410,742 votes to leave and 16,141,241 to remain.

But after 40 years of a bad marriage, divorce is proving to be very acrimonious. It’s no good saying they should never have married, but actually that is the truth – this star-crossed couple should never have got married. It could all have been avoided if only Indian astrolo­gers had been consulted.

Surely the Brits don’t believe in this astrological nonsense since their leaders “follow the science”?

You would be surprised.

Are you going to explain that re­mark or not?

Oh, all right. There was the occa­sion when the Indian “godman” Chandraswamy came to London in the summer of 1975 and completely mesmerised Margaret Thatcher.

That is nonsense – the “Iron Lady” taken in by an Indian “holy man”? I don’t believe you.

It is set out chapter and verse in K Natwar Singh’s book, Walking with Lions – Tales from a Diplomatic Past (HarperCollins).

Natwar, who was deputy Indian high commissioner in London, lat­er became external affairs minister. In his book, he reveals how he took Chandraswamy to Mrs Thatcher’s office in the Commons. He convinced her he wasn’t a fraud, gave her a talisman and instructed her to re­port to Natwar’s residence in the Frognal, Hampstead, wearing a red dress, which she did.

This next bit is from Natwar’s book: “She asked many questions but the most important related to the chances of her becoming prime minister. My wife was also present.

“Chandraswamy did not disap­point Mrs Thatcher. He prophesied that she would be prime minister for nine, 11 or 13 years. Mrs Thatch­er, no doubt, believed she would be prime minister one day, but nine, 11, 13 years was a bit much. Mrs Thatcher put one final question. When would she become prime minister? Chandraswamy announced, in three or four years. He was proved right. She was prime minis­ter for 11 years.”

So are you saying that the future of Brexit, and that of the UK and the EU, are all in the stars?

No, of course not. But it is just worth pointing that the EU flag has 12 stars in it. Chandraswamy is no longer with us, alas, but I could always ask India House if they know of an­other godman.

More For You

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less