Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Brexit and partition views

by AMIT ROY

BACK in December, David Landsman, the excellent executive director of Tata UK, sent


out a message: “In my last few days at Tata, I wanted to let you know that after five-and-a-half years, I will be stepping down from the company at the end of the year in

order to pursue a variety of business and other opportunities.”

Landsman, a safe pair of hands but also innovative, is a former diplomat. His successor, Tim Jones, is a former banker who was Natwest’s head of retail.

Under David’s watch, Tata took the decision to sponsor the Hay Festival. A decision was taken at the end of 2018 to end the sponsorship before Jones had taken over.

Peter Florence, director of the Hay Festival, said in a statement: “We had a fixed five-year contract with Tata as a main stage sponsor that ended in 2018. It was a great relationship both ways.”

I thought Tata’s sponsorship of Hay, where the spacious Tata Tent was always packed, was

a great success. Tata’s decision appears to have nothing to do with Booker winner Arundhati Roy’s long-held hostility towards the multinational. Having boycotted Hay while it

was sponsored by Tata, she will make an appearance and be in conversation with fellow author Pankaj Mishra on June 2.

It would be more interesting if Arundhati interviewed Pankaj, especially about his angry

article about Brexit – The Malign Incompetence of the British Ruling Class – in the New

York Times this year.

The gist of it is that “with Brexit, the chumocrats who drew borders from India to Ireland

are getting a taste of their own medicine”.

He argues: “The Brexiteers, pursuing a fantasy of imperial-era strength and self-sufficiency,

have repeatedly revealed their hubris, mulishness and ineptitude over the past two years.

“Such a pattern of egotistic and destructive behaviour by the British elite flabbergasts many people today. But it was already manifest seven decades ago during Britain’s rash exit from India.

“It is actually more accurate, for those invoking British history, to say that partition – the

British Empire’s ruinous exit strategy – has come home. In a grotesque irony, borders imposed in 1921 on Ireland, England’s first colony, have proved to be the biggest

stumbling block for the English Brexiteers chasing imperial virility.

Moreover, Britain itself faces the prospect of partition if Brexit, a primarily English demand,

is achieved and Scottish nationalists renew their call for independence.”

More For You

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

Piyush Goyal with Jonathan Reynolds at Chequers during the signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement in July

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

IN SIR KEIR STARMER’S cabinet reshuffle last week, triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, the prime minister shifted Jonathan Reynolds from business and trade secretary and president of the board of trade after barely a year in the post to chief whip, making him responsible for the party.

The move doesn’t make much sense. At Chequers, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement was signed by Reynolds, and the Indian commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal. They had clearly established a friendly working relationship.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less