Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Brexit and partition views

by AMIT ROY

BACK in December, David Landsman, the excellent executive director of Tata UK, sent


out a message: “In my last few days at Tata, I wanted to let you know that after five-and-a-half years, I will be stepping down from the company at the end of the year in

order to pursue a variety of business and other opportunities.”

Landsman, a safe pair of hands but also innovative, is a former diplomat. His successor, Tim Jones, is a former banker who was Natwest’s head of retail.

Under David’s watch, Tata took the decision to sponsor the Hay Festival. A decision was taken at the end of 2018 to end the sponsorship before Jones had taken over.

Peter Florence, director of the Hay Festival, said in a statement: “We had a fixed five-year contract with Tata as a main stage sponsor that ended in 2018. It was a great relationship both ways.”

I thought Tata’s sponsorship of Hay, where the spacious Tata Tent was always packed, was

a great success. Tata’s decision appears to have nothing to do with Booker winner Arundhati Roy’s long-held hostility towards the multinational. Having boycotted Hay while it

was sponsored by Tata, she will make an appearance and be in conversation with fellow author Pankaj Mishra on June 2.

It would be more interesting if Arundhati interviewed Pankaj, especially about his angry

article about Brexit – The Malign Incompetence of the British Ruling Class – in the New

York Times this year.

The gist of it is that “with Brexit, the chumocrats who drew borders from India to Ireland

are getting a taste of their own medicine”.

He argues: “The Brexiteers, pursuing a fantasy of imperial-era strength and self-sufficiency,

have repeatedly revealed their hubris, mulishness and ineptitude over the past two years.

“Such a pattern of egotistic and destructive behaviour by the British elite flabbergasts many people today. But it was already manifest seven decades ago during Britain’s rash exit from India.

“It is actually more accurate, for those invoking British history, to say that partition – the

British Empire’s ruinous exit strategy – has come home. In a grotesque irony, borders imposed in 1921 on Ireland, England’s first colony, have proved to be the biggest

stumbling block for the English Brexiteers chasing imperial virility.

Moreover, Britain itself faces the prospect of partition if Brexit, a primarily English demand,

is achieved and Scottish nationalists renew their call for independence.”

More For You

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

A billboard featuring Narendra Modi and Sir Keir Starmer welcomes the British leader along a street in Mumbai

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.

One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.

Keep ReadingShow less