Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

BBC faces Trump test

Leadership row revives debate on truth and bias

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

ENEMIES of the BBC will demand that Tim Davie’s successor as director general be someone who supports US president Donald Trump, rejects the notion that Is­rael has carried out genocide in Gaza, and is generally sympathetic to right-wing politics. A BBC that looks more like GB News would be perfect.

Any normal person reading Trump’s en­tire speech on January 6, 2021 – which pre­ceded the riots at the Capitol by his support­ers, whom he had egged on by falsely claim­ing that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen from him – would acknowledge that the two things were cause and effect.


And , Tim Davie

Unfortunately, the Panorama documen­tary spliced together two quotes 50 minutes apart to have Trump saying: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol... and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.”

But he did say: “You will have an illegiti­mate president. That’s what you’ll have. And we can’t let that happen.”

What does that mean?

He also said: “We won in a landslide. This was a landslide. They said it’s not American to challenge the election. This the most corrupt election in the history, maybe of the world.”

And: “We must stop the steal and then we must ensure that such outra­geous election fraud never happens again, can never be allowed to hap­pen again.”

I recall a speech we had to memorise at St Xavier’s School in Patna (India), – Mark Anthony’s very clever way of manipulating the crowds who were initially in favour of Julius Caesar’s assassi­nation. In Shakespeare’s play, Antony tells them that he can­not tell them they are the ben­eficiaries of Caesar’s will be­cause that would enrage them into taking action against Bru­tus and the other conspirators (“such honourable men”).

Antony words are worth reading in full to understand the underlying meaning of Trump’s speech:

ANTONY: “But here’s a parchment with the seal of Caesar;/ I found it in his closet, ‘tis his will:/ Let but the commons hear this testament – / Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read – / And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds/ And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,/ Yea, beg a hair of him for memory,/ And, dying, men­tion it within their wills,/ Bequeathing it as a rich legacy/ Unto their issue.”

Fourth Citizen: “We’ll hear the will: read it, Mark Antony.”

All: “The will, the will! We will hear Caesar’s will.”

ANTONY: “Have pa­tience, gentle friends, I must not read it;/ It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you./ You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;/ And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar,/ It will inflame you, it will make you mad:/ ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs;/ For, if you should, O, what would come of it!”

Possibly a riot at the Capitol? My guess is that Caesar’s will was fake news – it probably didn’t even exist.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep ReadingShow less