Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

BBC faces Trump test

Leadership row revives debate on truth and bias

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

ENEMIES of the BBC will demand that Tim Davie’s successor as director general be someone who supports US president Donald Trump, rejects the notion that Is­rael has carried out genocide in Gaza, and is generally sympathetic to right-wing politics. A BBC that looks more like GB News would be perfect.

Any normal person reading Trump’s en­tire speech on January 6, 2021 – which pre­ceded the riots at the Capitol by his support­ers, whom he had egged on by falsely claim­ing that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen from him – would acknowledge that the two things were cause and effect.


And , Tim Davie

Unfortunately, the Panorama documen­tary spliced together two quotes 50 minutes apart to have Trump saying: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol... and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.”

But he did say: “You will have an illegiti­mate president. That’s what you’ll have. And we can’t let that happen.”

What does that mean?

He also said: “We won in a landslide. This was a landslide. They said it’s not American to challenge the election. This the most corrupt election in the history, maybe of the world.”

And: “We must stop the steal and then we must ensure that such outra­geous election fraud never happens again, can never be allowed to hap­pen again.”

I recall a speech we had to memorise at St Xavier’s School in Patna (India), – Mark Anthony’s very clever way of manipulating the crowds who were initially in favour of Julius Caesar’s assassi­nation. In Shakespeare’s play, Antony tells them that he can­not tell them they are the ben­eficiaries of Caesar’s will be­cause that would enrage them into taking action against Bru­tus and the other conspirators (“such honourable men”).

Antony words are worth reading in full to understand the underlying meaning of Trump’s speech:

ANTONY: “But here’s a parchment with the seal of Caesar;/ I found it in his closet, ‘tis his will:/ Let but the commons hear this testament – / Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read – / And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds/ And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,/ Yea, beg a hair of him for memory,/ And, dying, men­tion it within their wills,/ Bequeathing it as a rich legacy/ Unto their issue.”

Fourth Citizen: “We’ll hear the will: read it, Mark Antony.”

All: “The will, the will! We will hear Caesar’s will.”

ANTONY: “Have pa­tience, gentle friends, I must not read it;/ It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you./ You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;/ And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar,/ It will inflame you, it will make you mad:/ ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs;/ For, if you should, O, what would come of it!”

Possibly a riot at the Capitol? My guess is that Caesar’s will was fake news – it probably didn’t even exist.

More For You

Reeves tax plan

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves

Reeves faces calls to resign over tax plan

IF ONLY voters had listened to Rishi Sunak last year, the economy would today have been in a much healthier state. Inflation was about two per cent when he was oust­ed from office. As chancellor, Rachel Reeves has managed to double that.

The Daily Telegraph wants Reeves to re­sign, allegedly because she misled the coun­try. She claimed the economy faced a black hole of £20–30 billion, but it has now emerged that Richard Hughes, chair of the indepen­dent Office for Budget Responsibility, told Reeves that “at no point” she faced a shortfall of more than £2.5bn. Hughes also confirmed that on October 31, the OBR upgraded its forecasts and told the chancellor that she, in fact, had a £4.2bn surplus. In other words, she stands accused of lying in order to justify her decision to raise taxes by £26bn.

Keep ReadingShow less