Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Bopanna-Babos enter semis of Australian Open mixed doubles

India's Rohan Bopanna and Timea Babos of Hungary entered the mixed doubles semifinals at the Australian Open with a straight-set win over Colombian Juan Sebastian Cabal and Abigail Spears of USA, on Wednesday (24).

The fifth seeded Indo-Hungarian pair took one hour and 15 minutes to get the better of Cabal-Spears duo 6-4 7-6 (5) in the quarterfinal duel.


It was a hard-fought encounter as Bopanna and Babos had to dig deep to squeeze out the win.

In fact, Cabal and Spears had the better break point conversion rate, utilising three out of the seven that came their way as against Bopanna and Babos' 4:12 record.

But Bopanna and Babos kept a steady lead throughout the duel and managed to score more winners in both their first and second serves to eke out the victory.

In the end the Indo-Hungarian duo won 73 points as against their rivals' 68.

Bopanna and Babos will take on the winners of the other quarterfinal between Australian duo of Storm Sanders and Marc Polmans and Spanish-Brazilian combination of Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez and Marcelo Demoliner in the semifinals.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Elon Musk’s 'The Odyssey' review: Robotic voices and lifeless visuals sink AI epic

The first episode follows Odysseus as he pretends to be mad to avoid joining the Trojan War

X/ imagine

Elon Musk’s 'The Odyssey' review: Robotic voices and lifeless visuals sink AI epic

Highlights

  • Elon Musk has released the first seven-minute episode of an AI-generated adaptation of Homer’s The Odyssey, created using Grok.
  • The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw criticised its lifeless visuals, flat storytelling and robotic voices.
  • The review questioned whether AI-generated filmmaking can offer genuine artistic value beyond its lower production costs.

Elon Musk’s attempt to bring Homer’s The Odyssey to the screen using artificial intelligence has received a scathing review, with a critic questioning the emotional depth and artistic value of the project.

Keep ReadingShow less