A black police officer with the Metropolitan police, who was dismissed last year, has won her job back after a tribunal said her sacking was unfair.
Supt Robyn Williams was dismissed in March 2020 after being convicted for possessing a child abuse video that she recieved unsolicited via WhatsApp and never viewed.
The Guardian reports that after Williams successfully argued her dismissal was unreasonable and unfair, a police appeals tribunal rescinded her sacking and replaced it with a final written warning.
She can now return to Met and resume her 36-year career where she was one of the most senior female African-Caribbean officers in Britain and was praised for her work after the 2017 Grenfell fire. williams has also been decorated with the Queen's Police Medal.
According to The Guardian report, the Met's black police association claimed her sacking was an example of institutional racism. Then there is another section who thought she could have avoided trouble, had she told the truth.
“For over a year, before and during the pandemic, I have continued to support local people by working within community initiatives. I am therefore delighted to be able to return to the work I love, serving our communities within London,” Williams was quoted as saying.
It all started in February 2018 after Williams was sent a Whatsapp message by her sister containing a video of a young girl being abused. The sister was outraged and wanted the culprit to be punished by the police.
But Williams never viewed the video and claims that she never knew it was in her phone. The concerned video was sent by the sister on a WhatsApp group of 17 people, and from the group only Williams was put on trial.
A jury convicted her after the prosecution said Williams failed to report fearing that would have landed her sister in trouble. They also added that before police came to know about the video, both the sisters had met in the day and it could have been discussed by them.
Police Superintendents’ Association professional standards coordinator Victor Marshall said: “We are pleased that today’s panel agreed that her dismissal was unreasonable in light of the complex circumstances surrounding her conviction and we are delighted she will be able to continue to serve the communities of London.”
“The tribunal determined Ms Williams’ dismissal should be replaced with a final written warning. We await the full judgment. Once received, we will then consider the ruling and engage with Ms Williams’ representatives accordingly,” the Met said in a statement.
When Miss England, Milla Magee, packed her bags and walked out of the Miss World 2025 stage in Hyderabad, she didn’t just make headlines, she blew the lid off a global beauty empire. For the first time in the contest’s 74-year history, a titleholder quit mid-competition, and her reasons hit hard: exploitation, hypocrisy, and outdated values dressed up in sequins.
Here are the five biggest revelations from a scandal that’s shaking the pageant world to its core:
1. “We were props for rich men” – Magee’s disturbing allegations
Magee painted a picture of contestants whisked from one polished gala to the next, all day and all night, clad in couture gowns and heavy make-up. But behind the lens? Magee said contestants were “farmed out” to entertain wealthy male sponsors at exclusive dinners, calling the experience degrading and old-fashioned.
“It made me feel like a prostitute,” she told reporters. “I couldn’t be part of it anymore.”
She also claimed there was constant pressure to look picture-perfect even during breakfast and said organisers scolded women who weren’t “exciting” enough for social media or the sponsors.
2. Two different stories and one huge question mark
While Magee said she left due to personal and ethical concerns, Miss World officials claimed she initially cited a family emergency. Miss World CEO Julia Morley fired back, suggesting Magee "believed she didn’t stand a chance," releasing sunshiny, unedited clips of Magee raving about Hyderabad’s "amazing biryani" as a jarring counterpoint to her later allegations.
Miss World CEO Julia Morley said, “She left with our support. Then we saw articles implying something very different.”
This raises a big question: Was Magee’s exit planned from the start, or did she have a change of heart after seeing what went on behind the scenes?
3. What the official inquiry found (and what it didn’t)
Telangana’s government responded fast, launching an investigation led by top officials, including three senior women police officers. CCTV footage from the key dinner event showed Magee sitting with four women and one senior IAS officer and not a room full of “middle-aged men.”
Other contestants interviewed didn’t back up Magee’s claims. Most complaints? Too many selfies and tight schedules. The inquiry head even floated the idea of a deliberate smear campaign against India and hinted that this might have been an attempt to smear the country's image.
Still, the fact that Magee was the only one to speak out raises uncomfortable questions about what actually happened, the silence, pressure, and fear in competitive environments.
4. Politicians got involved and the response was mixed
The scandal ripped through Telangana’s politics. Opposition leader K. T. Rama Rao, declaring "as a father of a girl," issued a raw apology: "I condemn what you experienced... This doesn’t represent Telangana’s culture," demanding a fair probe. State officials, however, went on the offensive, accusing Magee of outright "gaslighting," highlighting her brief 8-day stay, and muttering about legal defamation suits.
They claimed footage from the Chowmahalla banquet contradicted Magee’s claim of being seated with predatory sponsors, showing her sitting with four women and one senior IAS officer.
Magee’s walkout wasn't just about one night; it cracked open the pageant’s identity crisis. Remember, this is a lifeguard who’d already swapped swimsuits for CPR tests in Miss England, pushing purpose over pin-ups. With runner-up Charlotte Grant stepping into Magee’s shoes for the 31 May finale, the question looms: will organisers truly embrace change, or merely paper over cracks with some fresh lipstick?
With the Miss World 2025 grand finale just days away on 31 May, the spotlight is now split between the crown and the controversy. Milla Magee’s dramatic exit has pushed uncomfortable truths into the open, almost forcing the industry to reckon with its image, ethics, and expectations. Whether her claims are true or if all of it leads to real change or get swept under the red carpet remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the glitz of the pageant world no longer hides the cracks and the world is watching what happens next.
LONDON mayor Sadiq Khan has endorsed calls for the partial decriminalisation of cannabis possession, citing evidence that current laws cause more harm to society than the drug's usage while disproportionately affecting black communities.
The recommendation comes from the independent London Drugs Commission, chaired by former Labour cabinet minister Lord Falconer, which published a comprehensive report on Wednesday (28) examining cannabis policing worldwide.
"I've long been clear that we need fresh thinking on how to reduce the substantial harms associated with drug-related crime in our communities," Khan was quoted as saying, describing the report as providing "a compelling, evidence-based case" for reform.
The commission recommended removing natural cannabis from the Misuse of Drugs Act, where it currently sits as a Class B substance alongside drugs like ketamine, and instead maintaining it under the Psychoactive Substances Act. This would effectively decriminalise possession of small amounts for personal use while keeping production and distribution illegal.
Lord Falconer said that "continuing to have possession as a crime meant continuing have problems between the police and ethnic communities."
The report found that cannabis policing "continues to focus on particular ethnic communities," with stop-and-search powers most commonly initiated based on "the smell of cannabis" and used disproportionately against young black men.
"The law treats cannabis the same as a whole range of much more serious drugs," Falconer argued. "The right course now, we think, is keep dealing criminal but make sure that possession is not a crime."
However, the proposal has met fierce resistance from government and opposition politicians. Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner stated categorically that the recommendations were "not the government position and we are not going to be changing our policy."
A Home Office spokesperson reinforced this stance, saying: "We have no intention of reclassifying cannabis from a Class B substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act. We will continue to work with partners across health, policing and wider public services to drive down drug use."
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp launched a scathing attack on the proposal, warning: "Cannabis is associated with anti-social behaviour and heavy use can lead to serious psychosis and severe mental health problems. US and Canadian cities which tried this approach have ended up as crime-ridden ghettos with stupefied addicts on the streets and law-abiding citizens frightened to go there."
David Raynes from the National Prevention of Drugs Alliance argued that reducing legal consequences would wrongly signal that "cannabis was less harmful."
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley maintained neutrality, saying that drug laws were "a matter for parliament" while noting that "drugs being at the centre of a lot of crime" with "drug dealing so linked to violence."
The commission's report, compiled with evidence from over 200 international experts, found that current sentencing for cannabis possession "cannot be justified when balanced against the longer-term impacts" of criminal justice involvement. It noted that while cannabis can be addictive, those suffering adverse effects "need reliable, consistent medical and other support."
The report made 42 recommendations, including improved addiction services, better education programmes, and fair access to medical cannabis.
Jennie from BLACKPINK is at the centre of an online firestorm after her name was dragged into a scandalous podcast discussion. In an episode of Above The Influence, two influencers, Kira and Woohak, shared unverifiable stories accusing female K-pop idols of engaging in sexual activities with wealthy businessmen. Jennie was specifically named in one of the most shocking claims.
During the podcast, co-host Woohak claimed he once attended a summer camp with the son of a BMW heir. According to him, this person allegedly paid to sleep with Jennie and even had a video of the encounter. No video has surfaced, no names were confirmed, and no evidence was shown, yet the clip quickly spread online, causing major backlash.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire, Kira, who said she had previously dated BIGBANG’s T.O.P, went on to make sweeping claims about prostitution in the K-pop industry. She stated that even top-tier idols, including solo artist IU, were involved, quoting an alleged price for a night with IU at £400,000 (₹4.2 crore). Again, no proof was provided.
These comments sparked immediate backlash from fans. Social media was flooded with calls for both Jennie’s and IU’s agencies to take legal action against the podcast hosts for defamation. Many pointed out the serious consequences of spreading baseless accusations, especially in South Korea, where defamation laws are strict even when the remarks are made abroad.
Fans demand legal action after BLACKPINK’s Jennie named in shocking podcast claimsGetty Images
While neither YG Entertainment nor EDAM Entertainment has issued an official response yet, fans continue to demand accountability. Many fear that these kinds of reckless public claims can have a lasting emotional toll on the artists involved. They argue that spreading rumours in the name of entertainment crosses a line, especially when real lives and reputations are at stake.
Jennie, who recently performed at Coachella 2025 and released her solo album Ruby, is no stranger to media attention. But this latest controversy is different. It’s serious, personal, and, most importantly, unproven.
— (@)
As pressure mounts online, many are waiting to see if any legal steps will be taken or if the people behind the podcast will face consequences for what they’ve said. Until then, fans remain vocal in their support, calling for respect, responsibility, and justice.
Keep ReadingShow less
The incident in Liverpool city centre on Monday was believed to be isolated and not terrorism-related, according to police.
POLICE have been given extra time to question a 53-year-old man arrested after a car crashed into a crowd of soccer fans during a parade in Liverpool, injuring dozens.
"The investigation team have today been granted further time to continue questioning him in police custody, which will remain in place until tomorrow," Merseyside Police said on Wednesday.
Seven people remain in hospital in a stable condition following the incident on Monday, police said.
The incident in Liverpool city centre on Monday was believed to be isolated and not terrorism-related, according to police.
They said the driver of the grey Ford Galaxy involved in the crash had followed an ambulance into a closed street when a road block was lifted to let paramedics attend to a suspected heart attack victim.
Videos online showed the car driving through a street full of fans, sending some into the air and dragging at least four people under the vehicle.
When the car stopped, people surrounded it and began smashing its windows as police tried to keep them away from the driver.
Police said 50 people, including children, had been treated for their injuries.
King Charles, currently visiting Canada, said he was "deeply shocked and saddened to hear of the terrible events."
Princess Anne visited medics who had treated some of the injured at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital.
With many people off work for the Spring Bank Holiday, officials estimated about 1 million people had gathered along the 10-mile (16 km) parade route to watch the Liverpool team on an open-top bus with the Premier League trophy.
Liverpool had last won the league in 2020, but fans could not celebrate at the time due to pandemic lockdowns.
Police said the car struck the crowd as the parade was finishing. A Reuters photographer saw emergency services carrying victims to ambulances on stretchers and in their arms.
One source told MailOnline the driver appeared to panic when he realised he was in the crowd and people started hitting his car.
According to reports from other witnesses, the driver sounded his horn, reversed, and then accelerated forward.
Tension may be brewing behind the scenes between Kylie Jenner and Timothée Chalamet, with reports hinting that the beauty entrepreneur isn’t too happy about her boyfriend’s on-screen romantic roles. Sources close to the couple suggest that Kylie has asked Chalamet to steer clear of any future intimate scenes in his films, especially after buzz surrounding his chemistry with co-star Gwyneth Paltrow in the upcoming drama Marty Supreme.
Chalamet, known for his bold performances in films like Call Me By Your Name and Bones and All, is no stranger to portraying vulnerability and physical intimacy on screen. But his commitment to realism in acting appears to be clashing with Kylie’s discomfort. Insiders claim that her concern reached a peak following Paltrow’s recent interview where she described shooting multiple sex scenes for Marty Supreme, saying, “There’s a lot, a lot.” She also mentioned asking the intimacy coordinator to step aside, which reportedly didn’t sit well with Kylie.
Gwyneth Paltrow’s role in Marty Supreme making Kylie Jenner uneasyGetty Images
In Marty Supreme, Chalamet plays a ping-pong prodigy who ends up in a complicated relationship with his rival’s wife, played by Paltrow. The film is said to include several steamy sequences, which have only added to Jenner’s growing unease.
Although the couple have kept much of their relationship out of the spotlight, they’ve been seen together at public events like the Golden Globes and the Oscars. They were first linked in 2023, and since then, things seemed to be going strong. But sources say this disagreement marks one of the most serious bumps in their relationship so far.
According to insiders Timothée Chalamet’s film choices putting strain on his relationship with Kylie JennerGetty Images
According to reports, Kylie doesn’t want her partner to be seen in overly romantic roles and prefers that Chalamet take on projects that highlight his talent without the physical closeness to co-stars. She’s also reportedly voiced her dislike for seeing her boyfriend in such situations, even if it’s for work.
Despite the tension, there are whispers that Chalamet has been considering taking the relationship to the next level. But not everyone in his circle is on board. Some have advised him to hold off on any big decisions, especially with relationship pressures now intersecting with his career.
Could Timothée Chalamet’s romantic roles be causing tension with Kylie JennerGetty Images
Neither Jenner nor Chalamet has addressed the reports publicly. For now, all eyes are on Marty Supreme, which releases later this year.
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post