Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

BBC impartiality and Israel-Hamas conflict

If the BBC gives in over Hamas, this and future British governments will have made a rod for themselves

BBC impartiality and Israel-Hamas conflict

THE government is pressuring the BBC to refer to Hamas as “terrorists” instead of “militants” or “fighters” in its news reports.

But ministers should reflect on the consequences of taking such a stance. The BBC is part of British soft power precisely because it is independent of government.


Take, for example, the occasion when the Indian government reacted badly to the BBC’s two-part documentary on Narendra Modi earlier this year. The UK government resorted to its usual get-out of-jail card – it pointed out that however much it might disagree with the film, it could not tell the BBC what to do because it was an independent organisation.

If the BBC gives in over Hamas, this and future British governments will have made a rod for themselves. It will be asked by foreign administrations to intervene over BBC reports that they might not like.

Addressing a Jewish community vigil opposite Downing Street last Monday (9), the immigration minister Robert Jenrick condemned Hamas to loud cheers: “Let us be clear what the world has witnessed. These weren’t, as some in the media say, militants or fighters. They were terrorists. They were murderers. They were barbarians, and the BBC or whoever else we see on the television should say it as it is.”

John Simpson, world affairs editor of BBC News, hit back: “British politicians know perfectly well why the BBC avoids the word ‘terrorist’, and over the years plenty of them have privately agreed with it. Calling someone a terrorist means you’re taking sides and ceasing to treat the situation with due impartiality.

“The BBC’s job is to place the facts before its audience and let them decide what they think, honestly and without ranting. That’s why, in Britain and throughout the world, nearly half a billion people watch, listen to and read us. There’s always someone who would like us to rant. Sorry, it’s not what we do.”

If the BBC was seen to be taking sides, it could not report from both sides of a dispute. I knew my language was monitored by the Iranian authorities during long years in Iran when I reported on the students who took hostages at the US embassy in Teheran, the thousands of executions carried out by the regime, the Iran-Iraq war and the violence in a country in the throes of revolution.

I was very young and inexperienced, but I had to learn how to write several stories a day in the Daily Telegraph without using inflammatory language that would get me thrown out – or worse. It was much the same reporting the Falklands War from Buenos Aires.

Argentina, or stories from other “enemy datelines”.

I think that is the point the BBC is trying to make over covering Hamas. In the long run, it is more advantageous for the government to maintain a distance between itself and the BBC.

One invaluable lesson I learned in Iran was about the radical Islamist theory of chaos. That fitted in with the laws of chaos and the Brownian motion I had learnt in physics and in thermodynamics at university – things proceed from a state of disorder to greater disorder. In other words, things generally get worse.

This, I think, is Hamas’s thinking, which must have known that the Israeli response to its killings of more than 1,000 of its citizens, would be overwhelming. It wants to suck Israel into a state of even greater chaos.

After the 2008 Mumbai massacre, Manmohan Singh, then India’s prime minister, did something very difficult after the killing of 175 innocent people – he showed restraint, avoided “hot pursuit”, and basically did nothing.

Last week, I expressed the hope that the politics of the Israel-Hamas conflict wouldn’t spill over into Britain. It already has.

We are all familiar with the complex background to the Israel-Palestine conflict. I was lucky enough to have grown up with Jewish pupils, who were among my closest friends at school. They belong to a community that has much in common with aspirational British Asians. People know what I mean without having to spell it out. It is best to live in harmony in this country.

More For You

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Shraddha Jain

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

FUNNY UK TOUR

The tidal wave of top Indian stand-up stars touring the UK continues with upcoming shows by Shraddha Jain this July. The hugely popular comedian – who has over a million Instagram followers – will perform her family-friendly show Aiyyo So Mini Things at The Pavilion, Reading (4), the Ondaatje Theatre, London (5), and The Old Rep Theatre, Birmingham (6). The 90-minute set promises an entertaining take on the mundane and uproarious aspects of everyday life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: How populist politicians tackle personality clashes

Elon Musk with Donald Trump

Comment: How populist politicians tackle personality clashes

THE US president Donald Trump and billionaire businessman Elon Musk went to war on social media.

Geert Wilders brought the Dutch government down after less than a year. Nigel Farage scrambled to hold his Reform team together.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
Doctor Who
Doctor Who

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

RANI MAKES RETURNDoctor Who acclaimed actress Archie Panjabi added to her diverse body of work by playing the iconic villain Rani in the recently concluded series of Doctor Who. She reprised the role originally portrayed by Kate O’Mara decades ago. Unfortunately, the series – available on BBC iPlayer – has been plagued by problems and suffered plummeting ratings, largely due to poor storylines. As a result, Archie and fellow cast member Varada Sethu are unlikely to return in future episodes.

Doctor Who


Keep ReadingShow less
Priya Mulji with participants

Priya Mulji with participants at a Thailand retreat

X/ Priya Mulji

Finding my tribe in an unexpected place

Priya Mulji

I turned 43 recently, and it was the best birthday of my life. Special for so many reasons. For the first time since my twenties, I spent my birthday abroad. (In case you were wondering – Phuket, Thailand.)

Last year, I impulsively booked myself onto my friend Urvashi’s mind, body and soul expansion experience. Since then, life has taken some unexpected turns – including being made redundant from my day job – so this trip could not have come at a better time.

Keep ReadingShow less