Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Why Remember Together?

by SUNDER KATWALA

Director, British Future


REMEMBRANCE Sunday this year marks the centenary of the armistice of the First World War, that moment at 11 o’clock on the 11th day of the 11th month when the guns finally fell silent.

A tumultuous global conflict, which had claimed 16 million lives, finally came to an end.

The anniversary also closes the four-year commemoration of the First World War centenary.

The scale of public engagement, starting with the emotional response to the sea of poppies at the Tower of London in the summer of 2014, reflected a curious paradox. We feel that the world wars played a formative role in our national identity, yet most people began this centenary with a fairly sketchy sense of that history.

People sometimes wonder whether Britain’s traditions and rituals of Remembrance will retain their relevance to new generations in our fast-changing and increasingly diverse society.

Yet the centenary has made many more people aware of the surprising fact that the armies that fought a century ago looked much more like the Britain of 2018 than that of 1918, certainly when it comes to their multi-ethnic and multi-faith mix. Ten million soldiers came from across Britain, the Empire and Commonwealth. The 1.5 million servicemen from what was then undivided India – present-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka – would still be the largest-ever volunteer army in global history, had it not been for the even-larger Indian Army contribution to the Second World War a generation later.

Just four out of 10 people were aware that Indian soldiers took part in the First World War before the centenary began; that had risen to seven out of 10 people in the first two years of the event. What was minority knowledge has become something that most people have heard of.

British Future’s research into public views of the centenary finds the Commonwealth contribution is the issue on which public awareness has grown most. It has not been a minor tributary, but a major theme of the commemorations.

There has been an enormous level of activity in the Sikh community, with the UK Punjab Heritage Association helping many people discover their family connections. Few people realise that 400,000 Muslim soldiers fought in the First World War as part of the Indian Army, but New Horizons in British Islam and British Future have worked together to take that untold story around the country.

Muslim soldiers who lost their lives in the First World War were buried in Woking, Surrey, near the 19th century Shah Jahan Mosque. That burial ground has become a strikingly beautiful new memorial garden – its restoration covered in a BBC documentary – and a site for commemoration and education.

The role of Brighton’s Royal Pavilion as a makeshift hospital for Indian troops was commemorated in the post-war Chattri memorial, where events have swollen in numbers.

At the Oval Test during the summer, India’s Virat Kohli and England’s Joe Root wore special khadi poppies made of handwoven cotton, to support the Royal British Legion’s efforts to raise further awareness of the Commonwealth contribution.

The centenary has made our shared history better known than ever before. There is more work to do to ensure that this effort does not stop when the centenary ends, and it matters when extremists of different stripes do still try to co-opt national symbols of Remembrance to promote hate.

The far-right racists of Britain First and Anjem Choudary’s Islamist extremists both depend on an ignorance of the history of the world wars to claim that minorities can never be accepted as British. The real history of the Commonwealth contribution can provide a powerful antidote to these simplistic narratives.

Britain’s schools have found that our shared history of contribution resonates powerfully in classrooms that are more diverse than ever before. Yet, one wonders how many of those children’s parents, looking at local Remembrance services that mostly still look much “whiter” than the local communities in which they are located, conclude that Remembrance isn’t for them – or is something to which they don’t yet feel fully invited. More work is needed before the participation in local civic Remembrance activities fully reflects the diversity of the local population today.

Remembrance is powerful because it is voluntary. Everybody makes their own decisions about whether or how to participate. This Remembrance season will be more prominent than ever before in temples and mosques, as well as synagogues and churches, as different faiths support a new “Remember Together” campaign, which shows how our traditions of Remembrance can and do belong to us all.

The message at the end of this centenary should be clear – because they fought together, we remember together. Everybody is invited to participate in these moments that bring us together today.

Sunder Katwala is the director of British Future, which is coordinating Remember Together with the Royal British Legion. Visit www.remembertogether.uk for more information.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less