Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

US terminates preferential trade status for India

PRESIDENT Donald Trump has terminated India's designation as a beneficiary developing nation under the key GSP trade programme after determining that it has not assured the US that it will provide "equitable and reasonable access to its markets."

The Generalized System of Preference (GSP) is the largest and oldest US trade preference programme and is designed to promote economic development by allowing duty-free entry for thousands of products from designated beneficiary countries.


"I have determined that India has not assured the US that it will provide equitable and reasonable access to its markets. Accordingly, it is appropriate to terminate India's designation as a beneficiary developing country effective June 5, 2019," Trump said in a proclamation on Friday (31) ignoring the plea made by several top American lawmakers.

On March 4, Trump announced that the US intends to terminate India's designations as a beneficiary developing country under the GSP programme. The 60-day notice period ended on May 3.

The Trump administration has prioritised working with the government of India to ensure that the US companies have a level playing field, a senior state department official told reporters on Thursday (30), hours after Narendra Modi was sworn in as prime minister for a second time following his spectacular electoral victory in the general elections.

Under the GSP programme, nearly 2,000 products including auto components and textile materials can enter the US duty-free if the beneficiary developing countries meet the eligibility criteria established by Congress.

India was the largest beneficiary of the programme in 2017 with $5.7 billion in imports to the US given duty-free status, according to a Congressional Research Service report issued in January.      

The GSP criteria include, among others, respecting arbitral awards in favour of the US citizens or corporations, combating child labour, respecting internationally recognised worker rights, providing adequate and effective intellectual property protection, and providing the US with equitable and reasonable market access.      

Countries can also be graduated from the GSP programme depending on factors related to economic development.

In a statement, Coalition for GSP executive director Dan Anthony said Trump's decision will cost American businesses over $300 million in additional tariffs every year.

"Without GSP benefits American small businesses face a new tax that will mean job losses, cancelled investments and cost increases for consumers. Only a year after the Senate and House passed a three-year reauthorisation of the GSP by a near-unanimous margin, the Trump administration has kicked out the GSP country that saves American companies more money than any other," he said.

Anthony said the Trump administration made the decision in the face of opposition from members of the Congress and hundreds of American businesses that have called for continued GSP eligibility for India.

"They also acted despite India's willingness to negotiate new market access for American exports. Thus, there are no winners from today's decision. American importers will pay more, while some American exporters will continue to face current market access barriers in India and others, including farmers, are very likely to be subject to new retaliatory tariff, Anthony said.

The Trump administration argues that New Delhi has failed to assure America that it will provide equitable and reasonable access to its markets in numerous sectors.

Meanwhile, India had said that the US government's move to withdraw duty concessions on certain products under the GSP programme will not have a significant impact on exports to America as the benefits were only about $190m annually.

(PTI)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Heathrow Airport

Heathrow expansion could mean higher flight prices as the aviation industry faces pressure to cut emissions

iStock

How much more could you pay to fly if Heathrow gets its third runway?

  • A return flight to Alicante could cost an extra £150 by 2050 under the proposed approach.
  • A return trip to New York could cost up to £400 more.
  • The Climate Change Committee says Heathrow expansion must be matched by stronger action to cut aviation emissions.

Heathrow's proposed third runway could eventually make flying more expensive for passengers, with the UK's climate advisers warning that airlines may need to pass the cost of cutting aviation emissions on to travellers.

The Climate Change Committee (CCC) said Heathrow expansion could breach the UK's carbon budgets and make the 2050 net zero target impossible under current policies. It said expansion could only be compatible with the UK's climate commitments if the aviation industry became more efficient, increased its use of sustainable aviation fuel and paid for the permanent removal and storage of carbon from the atmosphere.

Keep ReadingShow less