UK public wants more foreign care workers, finds study
People mistakenly think asylum seekers make up more than five times as much of UK immigration, the new research has found.
Those who were polled showed their support for more migrant doctors and nurses in the NHS
By Eastern EyeSep 20, 2024
THE public have a false perception of the number of asylum seekers who arrive in the UK, according to findings of a report by the thinktank British Future.
People mistakenly think asylum seekers make up more than five times as much of UK immigration, the new research has found.
On average, the public think those seeking asylum represent more than a third of total immigration (37 per cent) when in fact that figure is only around seven per cent.
Four in 10 Reform voters (39 per cent) and three in 10 Conservatives (31 per cent) think more than half of UK migration is from asylum seekers.
Concern about asylum seekers was driven by a visible lack of control of Channel crossings, the report’s authors said. The report from Immigration Attitudes Tracker by British Future and Ipsos further stated that prime minister Sir Keir Starmer is likely to have considerable ‘breathing room’ as he exceeds public expectations on immigration numbers (see comment on page 8).
The authors anticipate net migration to continue to reduce over the next year – partly through circumstance, partly due to the policies of the previous government.
Net migration to the UK fell more than 10 per cent in 2023, according to official figures. The number of people coming to the UK, minus the number leaving – was 685,000 in 2023, figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed. That is a fall from 2022’s record net migration figure, which was 764,000.
However, half the public (50 per cent) expects net migration to in - crease over the next 12 months and only 12 per cent expect it to fall.
According to the research, the public underestimates migration for work and study, which makes up most mi - gration to the UK.
People think a quarter of immigration (26 per cent) is for work, when the actual figure is around 40 per cent; and estimate that only 19 per cent is for study at UK universities (actually around 38 per cent).
Most people wanting to work in the UK still have to apply for a visa through the points-based system (PBS). However, since April 11, 2024, they have needed a confirmed job offer with a higher salary. Applicants now have to earn at least £38,700 – an increase of nearly 50 per cent from the previous £26,200 minimum.
The threshold does not apply to some jobs – such as in health and social care, and teachers on national pay scales. But overseas care workers can no longer bring family depend - ants with them.
Announcing the new rules, former home secretary James Cleverly claimed 300,000 people who were eligible to come to the UK in 2022 would no longer qualify. The view among the public shows a support for more foreign medical staff.
However, half the public (50 per cent) want more migrants doctors to come to the UK (14 per cent would like numbers reduced) and 52 per cent want more nurses from overseas, with just 14 per cent saying they would prefer fewer.
Four in 10 people (42 per cent) want migration for care home work to significantly increase, 28 per cent want it to stay at current levels, and 18 per cent want it reduced.
It was a similar response for other jobs, with 35 per cent of the public wanting more people to come to the UK as seasonal workers to pick fruit and vegetables, only 19 per cent want numbers reduced.
For teachers, engineers and construction workers, more of the UK public want immigration to increase rather than decrease.
The tracker research, which has followed public attitudes to immigration since 2015, finds that support for re - ducing immigration overall has risen sharply by over 10 points in the last two years, to 55 per cent (from 42 per cent in February 2022).
Around four in 10 people (38 per cent) are opposed to reducing numbers (23 per cent would keep at cur - rent levels, 15 per cent increase).
People struggle to identify, however, what immigration they would cut.
From a list of migrant roles – doc - tors and care workers to construction workers, catering staff, fruit pickers and engineers – in almost every role tested, support for reductions was no higher than 30 per cent (the one ex - ception being bankers, where 37 per cent want reductions).
British Future director, Sunder Kat - wala, said, “Most people will be surprised to see net migration falling over the next 12 months. Prime minis - ter Keir Starmer will exceed public expectations, giving him breathing room to reshape the government’s ap - proach – though James Cleverly may argue that he deserves the credit.
“But falling numbers may do little to ease the anxieties of those most concerned about immigration. Most people massively overestimate how much of the UK’s immigration is for asylum seekers, and these skewed perceptions give us an increasingly unbalanced debate about the immigration we actually have.
“Pressure on the government will be focused on Channel crossings, where a visible lack of control drives public concern and frustration – and the government will urgently need to find a workable, long-term approach that carefully combines compassion with control.”
Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK Politics at Ipsos, said: “The election of a new government hasn’t stopped public concern over immigration, with over half of Britons now wanting to see overall numbers reduced – with worries over asylum and channel crossings particularly driving public concern.
“Labour are not yet in the position of the previous Conservative government, who were criticised from all sides over their handling of the issue, but nor is it a particular strength. And the underlying challenge facing them remains the same, how to respond effectively to the complexities of public opinion on this topic.”
Today, as the digital economy continues to evolve, passive income is no longer a wealth tool exclusive to the rich, but something that everyone can touch and participate in. With the integration of blockchain technology and green energy, LET Mining is providing global users with a new way of passive income: no operation, zero technical threshold, and daily income.
What is LET Mining?
LET Mining is an innovative cloud mining service platform that simplifies the complex cryptocurrency mining process into a few simple steps through cloud computing technology, allowing ordinary users to easily participate in digital currency mining and obtain stable passive income without purchasing expensive hardware equipment or mastering professional technical knowledge.
Advantages of LET Mining
✅ No equipment investment is required, just register to participate
✅ Daily income is automatically settled and credited in real time
3. Start mining: After purchasing the contract, the platform automatically allocates mining machines and starts mining
4. Get income: Daily income is automatically settled to the user account
5. Withdraw or reinvest: Users can withdraw at any time or choose to continue to purchase cloud computing power contracts
The entire process is completed completely online, and users can manage their mining investments through their mobile phones or computers.
Green energy driven, environmental protection and income go hand in hand
LET Mining adheres to the concept of green mining. The platform data center uses renewable energy such as solar energy and wind energy to reduce carbon emissions and create an environmentally friendly and sustainable mining model. Not only is it environmentally friendly, it also reduces the cost of cloud mining, allowing users to maximize their benefits.
The future belongs to those with "passive income"
In an era of increasing inflation and market uncertainty, assets that can continuously generate income are truly valuable. LET Mining is providing such a stable, safe and environmentally friendly income tool for global users.
Register for LET Mining now and start your daily income journey, making passive income no longer out of reach!
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
A FRESH parliamentary initiative to establish a dedicated Sikh regiment within the British Army has gained momentum in the House of Lords, with defence minister Lord Coaker expressing willingness to engage in further discussions about the long-debated proposal.
The issue was raised in the House of Lords on Monday (7) by Labour peer Lord Sahota, who asked whether there had been any progress on long-standing calls for a Sikh regiment.
"Given the loyalty of Sikh soldiers in both world wars, there has been talk of having a Sikh regiment in the British Army for a number of years," Lord Sahota said.
Minister of state at Ministry of Defence, Lord Coaker, responded positively, saying he was "quite happy to meet him to see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs, and those of many other faiths as well."
He also referenced the upcoming VJ Day commemorations on August 15, noting it would be an appropriate time to reflect on wartime sacrifices, particularly those of Sikhs worldwide.
While no firm commitment was made to establish a regiment, the exchange represents the most encouraging governmental response to the proposal in recent years.
Sikhs have served in the British Army since the mid-1800s and became renowned for their martial traditions. During the First World War, over 100,000 Sikhs served in France, East Africa, and Gallipoli.
Despite being less than two per cent of British India's population, they comprised roughly 20 per cent of the Indian contingent. In the Second World War, more than 300,000 Sikhs participated in campaigns across North Africa, Italy, and Southeast Asia.
The proposal for a British Sikh regiment has been raised repeatedly in Parliament. In 2007, plans were dropped after the Commission for Racial Equality expressed concerns about potential segregation.
The debate was revived in 2015 when former defence secretary Nicholas Soames urged the government to overcome "political correctness" and honour Sikh military service.
Sikh community leaders have consistently argued they could easily recruit enough volunteers for a regiment, pointing to precedents such as the Scots, Welsh, and Irish Guards, and the Royal Gurkha Rifles.
Currently, around 160 Sikhs serve in the British Army. The Defence Sikh Network continues to celebrate Sikh military traditions and encourage recruitment from the community.
Keep ReadingShow less
Cierra Ortega addresses her Love Island USA exit in a TikTok video
Cierra Ortega has exited Love Island USA after a past social media post using a slur resurfaced.
The 25-year-old content creator said she “had no idea” the word was a racial slur.
Ortega apologised to the Asian community and said she accepts being removed from the show.
She revealed her family has been threatened and immigration authorities were called on them.
Cierra Ortega, a contestant on this season of Love Island USA, has publicly apologised after an old social media post containing a racial slur resurfaced, prompting her sudden exit from the popular reality series.
The 25-year-old Los Angeles-based content creator addressed the controversy in a video, expressing regret for using a derogatory term towards Asian people in a post made last year. Ortega, who is of Mexican and Puerto Rican descent, said she was unaware of the word’s offensive meaning at the time but took full responsibility.
Ortega says she deleted the offensive post after learning it was a racial slurInstagram/cierra.ortega
Ortega says she had “no idea” it was a racial slur
In her nearly five-minute video, Ortega clarified that the post was made in 2024 and deleted as soon as a follower informed her that the word was a racial slur. “I had no idea that the word carried such pain or history,” she said, adding, “If I had known, I would have never used it.”
Describing the video as an “accountability post, not an apology video,” Ortega said she was deeply sorry to the Asian community and anyone she had hurt. She emphasised that ignorance was not an excuse and admitted that her actions had consequences. “Intent doesn’t excuse impact,” she said.
Following her exit from the villa, Ortega revealed that the backlash extended to her family. She claimed they had faced harassment, including death threats and even calls to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). “My family doesn’t feel safe in their own home,” she said. “There’s no need to fight hate with hate. I don’t think that’s justice.”
Ortega’s relatives later issued a statement on her Instagram story, saying they understood the anger but condemned the level of harassment. “We’re not here to justify or ignore what’s surfaced. But the threats and attacks go far beyond accountability,” they wrote.
Ortega’s Instagram story Instagram Screengrab/cierra.ortega
Ortega accepts the show’s decision to remove her
Although the episode announcing her departure referred only to “personal reasons,” Ortega said she fully supported Love Island USA’s decision to remove her from the show. “This was a consequence I deserved,” she stated. Her former villa partner, Nic Vansteenberghe, remained on the show and has since recoupled with another contestant.
Ortega insisted she deleted the offensive post immediately after realising its meaning and has since made efforts to educate herself and others around her.
The Love Island USA contestant apologised to the Asian community onlineInstagram/cierra.ortega
Second contestant to leave over resurfaced racist remarks
Ortega is the second contestant to be removed from this season over past racist language. Earlier in the season, fellow islander Yulissa Escobar was taken off the show after an old podcast clip emerged in which she used another racial slur. Escobar also apologised on social media and echoed Ortega’s concerns about the extreme online abuse following her exit.
The backlash faced by both women has raised concerns about the mental health of reality TV participants. Peacock, the NBC-owned streaming platform airing Love Island USA, recently aired an on-screen message urging viewers to stop targeting contestants with threats and harassment.
Love Island USA aired a message urging viewers to stop harassing contestantsInstagram/cierra.ortega
As the show heads towards its finale, the debate continues over how far accountability should go, and at what cost to the people involved.
Keep ReadingShow less
Heat can also damage everyday items like sunglasses, suncream and vape devices
Experts urge motorists to avoid leaving certain items in vehicles during upcoming heatwave
Temperatures expected to rise above 30°C across large parts of the UK
Contraceptives and common medications can lose effectiveness in high heat
Heat can also damage everyday items like sunglasses, suncream and vape devices
Drivers urged to act as UK braces for extended heatwave
Drivers across the UK are being urged to remove a range of everyday items from their cars ahead of a predicted heatwave, with experts warning that the rising temperatures could pose both safety and health risks.
The Met Office has forecast a prolonged spell of hot weather, with temperatures expected to soar into the low 30s on Thursday and Friday. Much of the UK is likely to hit its regional heatwave threshold by the weekend, with this episode potentially affecting a wider area and lasting longer than previous hot spells.
While motorists are often aware of the dangers of leaving items like electronics or water bottles in hot vehicles, motoring specialists have highlighted a less commonly known risk — heat damage to contraception and medication.
Heat can reduce effectiveness of contraceptives
Experts from car dealership group Dick Lovett have warned that items such as birth control pills and condoms should not be left inside cars during hot weather. The interior of a vehicle can act like a greenhouse, with temperatures increasing by up to 50% in just an hour, even when the car is parked in the shade.
Most hormonal contraceptives, including the pill, need to be stored at temperatures between 20-25°C to remain effective. Exposure to extreme heat can degrade the active ingredients, reducing their ability to prevent pregnancy.
Similarly, condoms can be weakened by high temperatures, as heat may damage the latex or cause it to dry out, increasing the risk of breakage during use.
Drivers who store spare contraceptives in their glove box or handbag for emergencies are advised to remove them during heatwaves and follow the storage guidelines provided on the packaging.
Medicines and other everyday items also at risk
Alongside contraceptives, many commonly used medicines are also vulnerable to heat damage. Items such as inhalers, insulin, antibiotics, and other prescription medications can lose potency if stored in high temperatures for too long.
To prevent any potential health complications, drivers should remove all medication from their vehicles during hot weather and keep them in cool, temperature-controlled environments.
Other items to avoid leaving in cars during a heatwave include:
Suncream (can degrade or leak)
Vape devices (pose fire risk)
Sunglasses (can warp or become brittle)
Fizzy drinks (risk of explosion or container damage)
By taking a few simple precautions, motorists can reduce health and safety risks and avoid damage to personal belongings during the UK’s latest summer heatwave.
Keep ReadingShow less
Bumrah replaced Prasidh Krishna in the line-up. (Photo: Getty Images)
ENGLAND captain Ben Stokes won the toss and chose to bat in the third Test against India at Lord’s on Thursday.
The decision brought India fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah straight back into action after missing the second Test. Bumrah, currently the world’s top-ranked Test bowler, had been rested for the match at Edgbaston, where India defeated England by 336 runs to level the five-match series at 1-1.
Bumrah replaced Prasidh Krishna in the line-up. Akash Deep, who had taken 10 wickets in Birmingham in Bumrah’s absence, retained his place. That win was India’s biggest Test victory away from home in terms of runs.
Stokes had opted to field in both previous matches of the series. England had won the first Test at Headingley by five wickets.
England had already announced their playing eleven for the Lord’s Test, with one change — Jofra Archer returned to the side after more than four years out of Test cricket due to injuries. He replaced Josh Tongue.
India captain Shubman Gill, who has scored 585 runs in the series so far at an average of 146.25 — including innings of 269 and 161 at Edgbaston — said he would also have bowled first.
"I was a bit confused this morning but I would've bowled first," Gill said at the toss. "If there is anything in the wicket, it's in the first day."
The 25-year-old added: "The bowlers are feeling pretty confident. I'm feeling great, as a batsman you feel like you'll always be in the middle."
Stokes said: "The mood's good. It's been a very well fought two Test matches, set up the series nice but we're pushing to leave Lord's leading 2-1. Bodies are all good, a quick turnaround, everyone's fresh."
Teams:
England: Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett, Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Ben Stokes (capt), Jamie Smith (wkt), Chris Woakes, Brydon Carse, Jofra Archer, Shoaib Bashir