Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Elon Musk claims new Grok 4 AI is ‘smarter than PhD graduates’

Musk has positioned Grok as an alternative to other chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini

Elon Musk

The launch of Grok 4 comes amid criticism of the previous version

Getty Images

Highlights

  • Elon Musk unveils Grok 4, calling it “the smartest AI in the world”
  • Grok 4 reportedly trained 100 times more than Grok 2
  • Musk says it performs at PhD-level across nearly all subjects
  • The launch follows controversy around Grok 3’s offensive responses

Musk launches Grok 4 AI model with bold claims of intelligence

Elon Musk has launched Grok 4, the latest artificial intelligence model developed by his xAI company, claiming it surpasses PhD-level intelligence across all academic fields.

Speaking at the launch, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO said Grok 4 had been trained using 100 times more data than Grok 2, which was replaced by Grok 3 in February this year. Musk described the new model as “the smartest AI in the world” and said it could achieve near-perfect results in graduate-level exams in almost every subject.


“Grok 4 is smarter than nearly all graduate students in all subjects simultaneously,” Musk said. He referred to the current pace of AI development as an “intelligence big bang” and suggested the model may soon contribute to significant technological breakthroughs.

Potential and concerns over AI ethics

While praising Grok 4’s capabilities, Musk acknowledged that the model “may lack common sense” despite its advanced reasoning skills. He stressed that the most important quality for any AI system is to be “truth-seeking” and stated that it is possible to embed values such as honesty and honour into AI, much like instilling values in a child.

Musk also predicted that the first “watchable half-hour” of television produced entirely by AI could be released by the end of 2025.

The launch of Grok 4 comes amid criticism of the previous version, Grok 3, after it generated antisemitic content, including messages that praised Adolf Hitler. In response, the official Grok account on X (formerly Twitter) said: “We are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts.”

Musk distances Grok from 'woke' competitors

Musk has positioned Grok as an alternative to other chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, which he has previously criticised for being “woke”. In June, he invited users on X to help train Grok using “divisive facts” — a term he used for politically incorrect but factually accurate statements.

The update also follows news that X CEO Linda Yaccarino is stepping down, nearly two years after being appointed by Musk to lead the platform he acquired for $44 billion (£32.4 billion) in 2022.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Graham Norton’s Meta victory could be a turning point for victims of deepfake misinformation

The ruling is likely to be watched closely by lawyers, campaigners and victims of online harassment

Getty Images

Graham Norton’s Meta victory could be a turning point for victims of deepfake misinformation

Highlights

  • Graham Norton has won a US court order requiring Meta to reveal information about an anonymous Facebook account.
  • The broadcaster says the page spread deepfake content and false claims about his health, family and views.
  • The case highlights the growing challenge posed by AI-generated misinformation.
  • The ruling could offer hope to others struggling to identify those behind harmful online content.

Graham Norton's legal victory against Meta is attracting attention beyond the entertainment world. The broadcaster successfully obtained a court order in California requiring the social media giant to disclose information that could identify the operator of an anonymous Facebook page accused of spreading false claims and deepfake content about him.

According to court filings, the account published fabricated stories about Norton's health, his husband and even falsely claimed that his mother had died. While the case centres on a high-profile television personality, its wider significance lies in what it could mean for others facing similar online attacks.

Keep ReadingShow less