Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Tug-of-war over migration proposals must be solved

BY SUNDER KATWALA,

Director, British Future


THE UK government’s long-awaited immigration white paper, published days before Christmas, aimed to set out the framework for a new post-Brexit immigration system. But the future direction of immigration policy is now a little less clear after its publication than it was before it; 2019 will be an important year for the key immigration policy debates that it leaves unresolved.

The white paper reflects an unresolved tug-ofwar between the home secretary Sajid Javid and prime minister Theresa May over immigration. They agree on ending free movement from the EU, but disagree about what should replace it and why.

For Javid, the central theme of the white paper is that Britain should welcome skills. Promoted to home secretary to sort out the Windrush scandal, Javid wants the government to see the “reset moment” of Brexit as an opportunity to rebuild public confidence in the contribution that immigration makes to Britain.

But the prime minister’s first thought about immigration remains what the government can do to cut it. Having failed in six years as home secretary to bring the numbers down to the levels pledged, new controls after Brexit offer a final chance to try to hit it, even though non-EU migration is well above the target on its own.

On skilled migration from outside the EU, Javid won the policy argument. The current quota on the number of skilled visas – 20,7000 a year, or fewer than 2,000 a month – is to be scrapped. It was that quota led to the bizarre spectacle of the government refusing visas to surgeons for the NHS, as the de facto salary threshold for a skilled work visa soared to £50,000.

A more liberal approach to post-study visas was little noticed. Graduates will be able to stay in the UK for six months, and for those with a PhD, this period is 12 months. A lower salary threshold – starting at £20,800 – will apply for recent graduates from UK universities, who can also apply for UK jobs on those special terms, after returning home, for up to two years after graduating.

But these policies risk remaining a well-kept secret. Neither the government nor its critics in the university sector doing much to challenge the widely-held misperception that a £30,000 salary threshold will apply to post-study visas too.

The government did not make a decision on whether the salary threshold for skilled visas will be the £30,000 recommended by the Migration Advisory Committee. Instead, it will consult for another 12 months on the threshold, and what happens in shortage occupations below it, reflecting widespread support within the Cabinet for a more flexible approach, particularly to avoid exacerbating a recruitment crisis in areas including social care and construction.

The government’s proposal for a 12-month temporary work visa for low and semi-skilled migration has been criticised from every conceivable angle. A constant turnover of temporary employees is of little interest to employers, outside agriculture, making productivity gains impossible.

Increased churn makes integration impossible too. So Javid’s aim of making integration more important in immigration policy risks remaining rhetorical – confined to symbolic measures like reviewing the citizenship test – if he can not move on from the prime minister’s preference for temporary migration, which has meant an active policy of discouraging settlement, citizenship and integration.

The public want to control low and semi-skilled migration, rather than to end it. The challenge is to devise a policy that meets the needs of the economy, and can secure the political and public consent required. Since the government’s policy risks doing neither, it created an opportunity to advance constructive alternatives that can meet this challenge better.

The white paper proposes to expand the role of the Migration Advisory Committee, with an annual migration report, to help inform the public debate. That was one proposal from the National Conversation on Immigration, which saw the Home Affairs Committee work with British Future and Hope Not Hate to show how engaging the public directly in the choices ahead can build a constructive consensus for immigration reforms, which can more successfully manage the pressures and so secure the gains of immigration. The government proposes to consult intensively with employers this year. It should ensure that is linked to direct and visible engagement with the public too.

This white paper leaves immigration policy still on the drawing board. It proposes a new immigration system for 2021 – but two and a half years are a long time in an era of unprecedented political volatility. The political dramas at Westminster – the Brexit crisis over the next three months, the transition to a new prime minister, and the timing of the next General Election – could all see the politics of immigration change course again. Seizing the opportunity of a reset moment on immigration will depend on increasing public voice and ownership of the choices that are made next.

More For You

Akshay Kumar and Ajay Devgn: Are ageing stars hurting Bollywood’s future?

Akshay Kumar (L) and Ajay Devgn

Getty Images

Akshay Kumar and Ajay Devgn: Are ageing stars hurting Bollywood’s future?

THE string of disastrous Bollywood films headlined by Akshay Kumar and Ajay Devgn in recent years has become a running joke.

With Hindi cinema going through arguably its worst phase in history, the two ageing actors prioritising quantity over quality has only added to the industry’s troubles. Both have continued their woeful run of failures by starting 2025 with flops Azaad and Sky Force.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Vicky Kaushal in 'Chhaava'

Chhaava

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

UK SHOW IS A SHOCKER

THE recent Rewind Queens tour was an absolute shocker. The concerts had already been postponed from 2024 due to Alka Yagnik’s severe illness, yet organisers likely knew she wouldn’t be able to perform in the January shows in London and Birmingham – but only announced her absence days before.

Keep ReadingShow less
Column: How much longer will Rachel Reeves stay on as chancellor?

Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves

Column: How much longer will Rachel Reeves stay on as chancellor?

THERE are a few Labour MPs who think “Rachel from accounts will be gone sooner than you think”.

She has certainly outdone Liz Truss in trashing the economy, but the prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer, will be loath to sack Rachel Reeves as chancellor because his own future is tied up with hers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cohesion and anti-racism: Two sides of the same coin

Access to opportunities can affect attitudes to immigration across Britain

Cohesion and anti-racism: Two sides of the same coin

SIX months have passed since the evil murders in Southport triggered six days of senseless violence.

Rioters terrified Muslim worshippers at the town’s mosque, tried to burn asylum seekers alive at a Rotherham hotel, and spread fear among ethnic minorities across the country by posting targets for a pogrom of future violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Himesh Reshammiya's silly quest for acting stardom

Himesh Reshammiya

​Himesh Reshammiya's silly quest for acting stardom

IN THE early 1950s, legendary music icon Mukesh was so desperate to become a leading man that he stopped singing for major movies to focus on making an acting breakthrough.

Decades later, Sonu Nigam also tried his hand at acting by starring in a few films. What these two singing stars had in common was that they both failed as actors and quickly realised when to stop. Both quit acting, concentrated on music, and went on to have incredible singing careers.

Keep ReadingShow less