Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Tribute to Tessa

by Amit Roy

FORMER MINISTER’S LEGACY GIVES HOPE TO OTHERS WITH CANCER


POLITICIANS have paid tribute to Dame Tes­sa Jowell, their friend and colleague who died last Saturday (12) aged 70, but I happen to know through personal sources that she was a genuinely nice person.

We are often critical of aspects of life in this country, but it is people like Tessa who make Britain the kind of special country that it is.

From diagnosis to death, her descent was swift, yet she made a memorable final appear­ance in the Lords on January 25 this year when she expressed concern for others.

“Seamus Heaney’s last words were, ‘do not be afraid,’” she said. “I am not afraid, but I am fearful that this new and important approach [to ‘adap­tive’ trials] may be put into the ‘too difficult’ box.”

“All we now ask is that doctors and health systems learn to do the same,” she added. “Learn from each other. In the end, what gives a life meaning is not only how it is lived, but how it draws to a close.

“I hope this debate will give hope to other cancer patients like me, so that we can live well with cancer, not just be dying of it.”

She revealed that she was suddenly unable to speak while getting into a taxi on her way to an event on May 24 last year. “Two days later, I was told that I had a brain tumour, glioblastoma mul­tiforme, or GBM,” she said.

Alas, in her case, although the tumour was removed, the disease was too far gone. But her legacy lives on. As a result of a meeting she had at 10 Downing Street with the prime minister, Theresa May, more money is to be spent on re­search and treatment of brain cancer.

Every year around 11,400 people in the UK are diagnosed with a brain tumour. Only 14 per cent survive their disease, about which much more needs to be known, for 10 or more years.

The UK will also host an annual Tessa Jowell global symposium aimed at bringing together the best clinical, scientific and academic minds on brain cancer.

Cutting across party lines, May summed up: “Baroness Tessa Jowell faced her illness with dignity and courage – and it was a privilege to host her in Downing Street recently to discuss what more we can do to tackle brain cancer… I hope the actions we are taking now and in the future to improve care and research for those confronting a terrible disease will form part of the lasting legacy of an inspirational woman.”

More For You

Will Britain’s immigration debate catch up with the reality of falling numbers?

An inflatable 'small boat' carrying migrants crosses the channel after leaving northern France on April 27, 2026 in Dover, England.

Getty Images

Will Britain’s immigration debate catch up with the reality of falling numbers?

Sunder Katwala

“Net migration has fallen 82 per cent. My government is delivering”, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer tweeted, celebrating fewer people coming to Britain.

Falling immigration may be Britain’s best kept political secret. Only one in six people know that net migration fell last year or think it will fall this year, according to British Future’s new Immigration Attitudes Tracker research. Half think immigration is still rising. Yet the drops are dramatic. Net migration halved from 800,000 to 400,000 in the first year, then more than halved again to 171,000 in 2025. Few at Westminster have yet clocked that net migration is set to halve again this year, dropping below 100,000 for the first time this century.

That could make 2026 the year when falling immigration becomes harder to ignore. Would it be a political triumph for Labour to actually hit that old “tens of thousands” net migration target that [former Conservative prime minister] Theresa May always missed? That does come with a catch. This government needs to decide how big a price-tag it is willing to swallow for lower immigration. The Treasury numbers added up by estimating an average inflow of 235,000 a year for the rest of this parliament. But that will surely be at least 100,000 higher than reality now. Whether that fiscal adjustment is £13 bn or doubles to £25 bn depends on how low net migration goes. That is a big opportunity-cost choice about government priorities that the Starmer cabinet has never properly considered.

Keep ReadingShow less