BRITAIN'S tax authorities have requested the liquidation of several subsidiaries of British Indian billionaire Sanjeev Gupta's Liberty Steel due to £26 million in unpaid debts, media reported Thursday (10).
The Financial Times, citing documents filed in court this week, said authorities are seeking the liquidation of the Speciality Steel UK, Liberty Pipes, Liberty Performance Steels and Liberty Merchant Bar subsidiaries.
Sky News also reported the move to liquidate the units, adding the case should be taken up by the court this month.
The request by HM Revenue and Customs could topple Liberty Steel and put 3,000 UK jobs at risk.
Gupta was once seen as the saviour of British steelmaking, but one of the world's top steel groups has been fighting for survival following the collapse last March of Greensill Capital, the main lender to its parent company Gupta Family Group (GFG) Alliance.
A Liberty Steel spokesman said the company is "committed to repaying all our creditors" and was working to find an amicable solution.
"Short-term actions that risk destabilising these efforts are not in anyone’s interest," added the spokesman.
HMRC declined to comment on particular cases, but said it takes a "supportive approach to dealing with customers who have tax debts, working with them to find the best possible solution based on their financial circumstances".
Since the collapse of Greensill, which specialised in short-term corporate loans via a complex and opaque business model, GFG Alliance has been scrambling to restructure and cut costs to survive.
It announced the sale of two car parts factories in Britain and the closure of a third.
But it also injected 50 million pounds into one Liberty Steel site to restart production, saving 660 jobs, while the steelmaker is seeking to sell several other UK facilities.
GFG Alliance, which employs 35,000 throughout the world, is also under investigation for fraud and money laundering in its business activities, including in connection with the collapse of Greensill.
(AFP)
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
For many retailers, this has meant closing stores, cutting jobs, and focusing on more profitable business segments
Getty
6 UK retailers facing major store closures in 2025
Apr 23, 2025
In 2025, several UK retailers are experiencing major store closures as they struggle to navigate financial pressures, rising operational costs, and changing consumer behaviours. These closures reflect the ongoing challenges faced by traditional brick-and-mortar stores in an increasingly digital world. While some closures are part of larger restructuring efforts, others have been driven by financial instability or market shifts that have forced retailers to rethink their business strategies. Let’s take a closer look at six major UK retailers affected by these trends.
1. Morrisons
Morrisons, one of the UK's largest supermarket chains, is undergoing a significant restructuring in 2025. The company has announced the closure of several in-store services, including 52 cafés, 18 Market Kitchens, 17 convenience stores, and various other departments. This move is part of a larger strategy to streamline operations and address rising costs. Morrisons’ parent company, CD&R, has been focusing on reducing overheads and refocusing on core services.
The closure of these stores and departments follows several rounds of cost-cutting initiatives and staff redundancies aimed at improving operational efficiency. The supermarket chain’s decision to close some of its non-core departments reflects the ongoing pressure to cut costs and adapt to a rapidly changing retail environment. With inflation continuing to impact consumer spending habits, Morrisons is making these strategic adjustments to ensure the long-term sustainability of the business.
2. Sainsbury’s
Sainsbury’s, one of the largest supermarket retailers in the UK, is also facing a significant number of closures due to financial challenges. In 2025, the company announced the closure of multiple hot food counters and cafés across its stores. This decision has resulted in the loss of 3,000 jobs, as the retailer continues to restructure its operations in response to rising labour and operational costs. The closures are part of a wider effort to streamline Sainsbury’s business model and refocus on its core supermarket operations.
Sainsbury’s has made it clear that this decision is driven by a need to prioritise cost-effective solutions, especially with the increasing pressure from inflation and higher staff wages. By consolidating operations and shifting its focus to essential retail functions, the company hopes to remain competitive in a highly challenging market. The closures are a reminder of the harsh realities that UK retailers face as they adapt to a rapidly changing retail landscape.
3. Marks & Spencer
Marks & Spencer has been actively restructuring its store network in 2025, closing a number of locations and refocusing on more profitable outlets. One of the most significant closures has been in Leeds, where the retailer shut down its iconic city centre store. As part of its efforts to consolidate operations, M&S has also been shifting towards smaller food-only stores, as the company looks to modernise its retail strategy and adapt to shifting consumer preferences.
Marks & Spencer’s decision to close stores is part of a wider trend in which many retailers are consolidating their store footprints and focusing on the locations that generate the most profit. With increasing pressure from the rise of e-commerce and changing consumer shopping habits, M&S is aiming to ensure that its store network remains sustainable in the long term. Despite the closures, M&S continues to invest heavily in its online operations, which have proven to be more profitable and resilient in the face of current economic conditions.
4. Wilko
In 2023, Wilko, a long-established homeware retailer, entered administration and was forced to close all 400 of its stores across the UK. The company had been struggling for years due to declining sales, changing shopping habits, and increased competition from discount retailers. Attempts to find a buyer for the business were unsuccessful, and the retailer ultimately shut its doors, leading to the loss of thousands of jobs.
Wilko’s closure was a stark reminder of how financial instability and failure to adapt to changing market conditions can spell the end for even the most established brands. The company’s inability to innovate and its reliance on an outdated business model contributed to its downfall. While the closure marked the end of a long era for the retailer, it also serves as a cautionary tale for other companies struggling to stay afloat in the modern retail environment.
5. Debenhams
Debenhams, a household name in UK retail for over 240 years, shut down its entire store network in 2021. The decision to close all 124 stores was made after the company failed to secure a viable future, following its decline in sales and a growing preference for online shopping. In the wake of the closures, Debenhams has shifted its focus to an online-only model, continuing to operate in international markets such as the Middle East.
The demise of Debenhams highlights the challenges faced by traditional department stores, many of which have struggled to adapt to the shift towards online shopping. Despite attempts to revitalise its brand and business strategy, the retailer couldn’t overcome the combined pressures of changing consumer behaviour, increased online competition, and declining foot traffic in high streets and shopping centres.
6. House of Fraser
Once a thriving department store chain, House of Fraser has faced a series of store closures over the past few years as it attempts to adapt to a more challenging retail environment. Since 2018, the chain has reduced its number of stores from over 60 to just around 30, as part of an ongoing restructuring effort. While the brand remains active, it’s now primarily focused on premium retail offerings and its e-commerce platform.
The closures and the ongoing shift to an online model are a direct response to the increasing pressures of the retail landscape. With fewer shoppers visiting traditional department stores, House of Fraser has been forced to refocus its business strategy and streamline its operations to stay afloat.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
Current Issue
The UK is seeking an agreement with the US to remove Trump’s 10 per cent general tariff on goods and the 25 per cent tariff on steel and cars.
Getty Images
Industry warns Starmer: Strike deal with US or face factory job losses
Apr 23, 2025
FACTORY owners could begin laying off workers within months unless prime minister Keir Starmer secures a trade agreement with US president Donald Trump, MPs have been told.
Make UK, an industry lobby group, told the business and trade select committee that tariffs on British exports were reducing demand for UK-manufactured goods.
The Telegraph reported that without a deal to lift the tariffs, manufacturers may be forced to reduce output and staff.
The UK is seeking an agreement with the US to remove Trump’s 10 per cent general tariff on goods and the 25 per cent tariff on steel and cars.
Stephen Phipson, chief executive of Make UK, told The Telegraph: “We don’t know from one day to the next whether Trump is going to carry on, whether he’s going to suspend [the tariffs], whether he’s going to change. It makes planning your business and your investments extremely challenging.”
He added that some manufacturers had put in short-term contingency plans and warned that job cuts could begin as early as this summer. “They will absolutely have to,” he said.
He noted that while larger firms may have two to three months of buffer time, smaller companies are already facing immediate impacts.
Carmakers have also raised concerns. Jaguar Land Rover paused US exports this month. Nissan’s senior vice-president Alan Johnson told MPs the UK was “too expensive” to sustain car manufacturing without policy changes.
Make UK said the sector supports 2.6 million jobs. Starmer’s recent call with Trump was described by Downing Street as “productive.” The prime minister has not ruled out reciprocal tariffs if no deal is reached.
Keep ReadingShow less
Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the rail and sections hot end rolling mill during her visit to the British Steel site on April 17, 2025 in Scunthorpe, England. (Photo by Danny Lawson - WPA Pool/Getty Images)
British Steel halts layoffs after government rescue plan
Apr 23, 2025
BRITISH STEEL announced on Tuesday (22) it has halted plans to lay off thousands of workers after the government secured the raw materials necessary to keep the country's last steelmaking blast furnaces running.
The future of the plant was thrown into jeopardy in March when its Chinese owners Jingye said it was no longer financially viable to keep the blast furnaces burning, putting 2,700 jobs at risk.
That led the government to pass emergency legislation to prevent the closure of British Steel's main plant in northern Scunthorpe earlier this month.
A new interim management team was also appointed.
British Steel said that "it will not continue with the consultation on redundancies announced by the previous management".
"The work done to secure the raw materials we need for both... blast furnaces means we are able to run both continuously," added interim chief commercial officer Lisa Coulson.
Before the government took control of the company, Jingye had halted orders of raw materials such as coking coal and iron ore, after losing around £700,000 ($937,000) per day on the plant.
The fallout over British Steel also led to a spat with China.
Beijing warned Britain against "politicising" the rescue of British Steel, while UK Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the UK had been "naive" to let the Chinese firm take over part of the sensitive steel industry.
The government is now looking for potential private buyers for the company, although nationalisation remains an option.
The plant in northeast England is the last in the UK to produce virgin steel used in construction and rail transport.
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
The decision to cut jobs at head office will likely have a significant impact on the workforce
Getty
Sainsbury’s to cut 3,000 jobs and close 3 in-store services
Apr 23, 2025
Sainsbury’s has announced plans to cut 3,000 jobs across its operations, along with the closure of three key in-store services. The UK supermarket giant confirmed that the closures will impact its larger stores, with the patisserie, hot food, and pizza counters set to shut down by early summer.
As part of the changes, the most popular items previously sold at these counters will be relocated to other sections of the stores, ensuring customers can still purchase these products despite the closure of the dedicated counters. Additionally, Sainsbury’s will introduce new ‘On The Go’ hubs by autumn, offering hot food options to meet customer demand for convenience.
These closures were initially announced earlier this year in January, and although they will affect the chain’s largest stores, smaller local Sainsbury’s shops will not be impacted by the changes. The supermarket’s cafes have already closed, with the final day of service on 11 April. The decision to shut down these cafes follows a decline in customer footfall, which the company cited as the reason for their closure.
Alongside the store service cuts, Sainsbury’s has confirmed a reduction in its head office staff by 20%. However, details regarding the specific timing of the job cuts have not been disclosed, with the affected staff members yet to be informed. The decision comes amid what the company described as a “challenging cost environment.”
Simon Roberts, CEO of Sainsbury’s, commented on the difficult market conditions in January, acknowledging the supermarket chain’s need to adapt in an increasingly competitive sector. Despite these challenges, he assured stakeholders that Sainsbury’s remains well-positioned within the market. Roberts stated, “We’re in the strongest place we’ve ever been, and we intend to stay there,” adding that the supermarket had spent the last four years refining its pricing strategy.
The company’s recent financial results highlighted the ongoing efforts to maintain a strong competitive position, despite the challenges posed by inflation and the cost of living. Roberts also expressed confidence that Sainsbury’s could weather the storm, saying, “The one billion guidance gives us all the capacity we need to make sure that, above all else, we can sustain the strength of our competitive position.”
The closures and job cuts come as the supermarket faces mounting pressure in the highly competitive grocery sector, with several rivals, including Tesco and Asda, continuing to adjust their own strategies in response to rising costs and shifting consumer habits.
Sainsbury’s has been working to balance the need for cost-cutting measures while ensuring it continues to provide quality products and excellent customer service. According to Roberts, Sainsbury’s belief in its “winning combination” of value, quality, and customer service will keep it competitive. “We really believe that our winning combination of great value, quality products and the brilliant customer service that our colleagues deliver day in day out will keep delivering for us,” he said.
Despite the closures, Sainsbury’s is focusing on areas of growth, particularly in convenience food and online shopping, with the introduction of the ‘On The Go’ hubs representing a strategic move to cater to customers’ changing preferences. The company has also been investing in its online and home delivery services to stay competitive with rivals offering similar services.
The decision to cut jobs at head office will likely have a significant impact on the workforce, but Sainsbury’s has reiterated that these measures are part of its ongoing efforts to streamline its operations and maintain financial stability in a difficult economic climate. Although the supermarket has not provided a timeline for when the job cuts will occur, they have confirmed that it will be part of an overall restructuring process.
Sainsbury’s has assured customers that despite the changes to services, it will continue to offer a wide range of high-quality products, both in-store and online. The company also stressed its commitment to innovation and adapting to the evolving retail landscape in order to maintain its position as one of the UK’s leading supermarket chains.
As the situation develops, Sainsbury’s will be under pressure to navigate the current cost challenges while balancing the need for job cuts and service reductions. However, Roberts remains optimistic about the company’s future, asserting that Sainsbury’s is in a strong position to weather the ongoing storm.
Keep ReadingShow less
Unsafe ‘energy-saving’ plugs still sold online despite safety concerns
Apr 23, 2025
Plug-in devices marketed as “energy-saving” products are still being sold across online marketplaces in the UK, despite being illegal and failing basic safety tests, according to a new investigation by consumer group Which?.
The study found that several of these cheap devices, often called “eco plugs” or “energy-saving plugs”, not only failed to deliver any energy-saving benefits but also posed potential risks such as fire or electric shock. Some of the products, priced as low as £5, were tested and found to be unsafe for household use.
Which? has been carrying out investigations into unsafe electronics for several years. In its latest research, eight plug-in devices were purchased from major online retailers, including Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Shein and Temu. None of the devices met the minimum electrical safety standards required by UK law.
A Which? spokesperson said: “More concerningly, they failed basic electrical safety standards, meaning they are illegal and potentially dangerous.”
Many of the devices claimed to save energy by “stabilising” voltage and “balancing” electrical currents to improve appliance performance. However, Which? said its testing showed no evidence to support such claims.
In addition to being ineffective, the plugs were found to be poorly constructed. Which? highlighted several issues in the products it examined, such as poor-quality soldering, excessive levels of lead, and overall substandard manufacturing.
Warnings about similar devices have existed for over a decade. In 2011, trading standards officers issued alerts over plug-in products that falsely claimed they could reduce energy bills by up to 40%. The Office for Product Safety and Standards has since recalled a number of these items, citing serious risks including fire hazards and electric shocks.
Despite repeated safety warnings and previous recalls, these devices continue to be listed on popular e-commerce platforms. Which? argues this indicates a lack of adequate oversight and accountability from the online marketplaces themselves.
The consumer group is calling for tougher legislation to address the issue. It said the government must use its upcoming Product Regulation and Metrology Bill to place clear legal obligations on online marketplaces, holding them responsible for ensuring the safety of items sold on their platforms. Which? also wants the new rules to include strict enforcement measures, such as significant financial penalties for non-compliance.
All five companies named in the investigation responded to the findings. According to Which?, each platform confirmed that the unsafe listings identified in the inquiry had been removed.
A spokesperson for eBay said that it had already taken action to remove the listings before being contacted by Which?, citing internal safety measures designed to detect unsafe or banned items. Amazon said it requires all products to comply with applicable regulations and had removed the offending listings.
Temu stated it had also removed the product after its internal monitoring flagged safety concerns. Similarly, Shein said it takes safety seriously and removes potentially unsafe products as a precaution while investigations are carried out. AliExpress confirmed it requires sellers to comply with both local laws and platform rules and has taken down the listings in question.
Which? is urging ministers to ensure that any future legislation includes mechanisms that prevent unsafe products from reaching consumers through online sales channels.
The investigation highlights ongoing challenges in regulating third-party sellers on international online marketplaces and the need for more robust systems to ensure consumer safety in the UK’s e-commerce space.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc