Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Sushant Singh Rajput's family says Rhea Chakraborty was wrongly cleared in his suicide case

Sushant Singh Rajput family fights the report and says important evidence was left out.

Sushant Singh Rajput and Rhea Chakraborty

Legal battle reignites as Sushant Singh Rajput family rejects Rhea Chakraborty clearance

Getty Images/Instagram/rhea_chakraborty

Highlights:

  • Family calls the report an “eyewash”, vows legal action
  • Rhea Chakraborty was cleared of abetment and financial charges
  • Lawyer says key evidence missing from closure report
  • Case returns to Patna court in December

The storm around the Sushant Singh Rajput death case refuses to quiet down. Days after India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the country’s top investigative agency filed a closure report giving Rhea Chakraborty a clean chit, the late actor’s family hit back, calling the document “flimsy” and “incomplete”. Their lawyer, Varun Singh, said the family would file a protest petition, mentioning the investigation “fails to tell the truth”.

Sushant Singh Rajput and Rhea Chakraborty Legal battle reignites as Sushant Singh Rajput family rejects Rhea Chakraborty clearance Getty Images/Instagram/rhea_chakraborty



What did the CBI conclude?

Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead at his home in Bandra on June 14, 2020. The CBI said it was suicide. The report says there is no evidence that Rhea Chakraborty, her brother Showik or anyone else forced or threatened him. It also says there was no sign of any money misuse or fraud.

When Rhea left Sushant’s home on 8 June, she reportedly took only her Apple laptop and a watch he had gifted her. “No property was dishonestly taken out of his possession,” the report notes. CBI officials even cited that Rajput had referred to Rhea as “family” in earlier conversations, a detail now fuelling new rounds of debate online.


Why the family is calling it an ‘eyewash’

Rajput’s family argues the agency’s closure report leaves too many blanks. Their lawyer told reporters that crucial files, including phone records, witness statements, and medical documents were missing.

“This is nothing but eyewash,” he said, questioning why the CBI hadn’t submitted all supporting material to court. “If they truly wanted transparency, they’d have placed every document on record.” For them, the issue isn’t only justice for Sushant Singh Rajput. It’s about faith in the system that once promised to deliver it.

More For You

The Mummy

Relies on body horror, sound design and shock value over spectacle

X/ DiscussingFilm

How Lee Cronin’s 'The Mummy' turns a classic adventure into a domestic horror

Highlights

  • Moves away from the adventure tone of The Mummy (1999) into possession-led horror
  • Shifts the setting from desert tombs to a family home in Albuquerque
  • Focuses on parental fear and a “returned” child rather than treasure hunting
  • Relies on body horror, sound design and shock value over spectacle
  • Critics call it bold and unsettling, but uneven in storytelling

From desert spectacle to domestic dread

For decades, The Mummy has been tied to adventure, romance and spectacle, most famously in The Mummy (1999). That version thrived on sweeping desert landscapes, archaeological intrigue and a sense of escapism.

Lee Cronin takes a sharply different route. His reworking strips away the sense of adventure and relocates the horror into the home. The story still begins in Egypt, anchored by an ancient sarcophagus, but quickly shifts to the United States, where the real tension unfolds inside a family house.

Keep ReadingShow less