Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Sushant Singh Rajput's family says Rhea Chakraborty was wrongly cleared in his suicide case

Sushant Singh Rajput family fights the report and says important evidence was left out.

Sushant Singh Rajput and Rhea Chakraborty

Legal battle reignites as Sushant Singh Rajput family rejects Rhea Chakraborty clearance

Getty Images/Instagram/rhea_chakraborty

Highlights:

  • Family calls the report an “eyewash”, vows legal action
  • Rhea Chakraborty was cleared of abetment and financial charges
  • Lawyer says key evidence missing from closure report
  • Case returns to Patna court in December

The storm around the Sushant Singh Rajput death case refuses to quiet down. Days after India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the country’s top investigative agency filed a closure report giving Rhea Chakraborty a clean chit, the late actor’s family hit back, calling the document “flimsy” and “incomplete”. Their lawyer, Varun Singh, said the family would file a protest petition, mentioning the investigation “fails to tell the truth”.

Sushant Singh Rajput and Rhea Chakraborty Legal battle reignites as Sushant Singh Rajput family rejects Rhea Chakraborty clearance Getty Images/Instagram/rhea_chakraborty



What did the CBI conclude?

Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead at his home in Bandra on June 14, 2020. The CBI said it was suicide. The report says there is no evidence that Rhea Chakraborty, her brother Showik or anyone else forced or threatened him. It also says there was no sign of any money misuse or fraud.

When Rhea left Sushant’s home on 8 June, she reportedly took only her Apple laptop and a watch he had gifted her. “No property was dishonestly taken out of his possession,” the report notes. CBI officials even cited that Rajput had referred to Rhea as “family” in earlier conversations, a detail now fuelling new rounds of debate online.


Why the family is calling it an ‘eyewash’

Rajput’s family argues the agency’s closure report leaves too many blanks. Their lawyer told reporters that crucial files, including phone records, witness statements, and medical documents were missing.

“This is nothing but eyewash,” he said, questioning why the CBI hadn’t submitted all supporting material to court. “If they truly wanted transparency, they’d have placed every document on record.” For them, the issue isn’t only justice for Sushant Singh Rajput. It’s about faith in the system that once promised to deliver it.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

OnlyFans

While managers market themselves as specialists who help creators attract subscribers

Getty Images

OnlyFans managers accused of threats, account takeovers and taking 70 per cent of creators' income

Highlights

  • BBC investigation heard from 60 UK-based OnlyFans creators
  • Some creators alleged they were threatened after trying to leave management contracts
  • Contracts reviewed by the BBC showed agencies taking up to 70 per cent of earnings
  • Experts have called for greater oversight of the largely unregulated industry

A BBC investigation has uncovered allegations that some OnlyFans creators are facing threats, intimidation and financial exploitation from third-party managers who promise to help grow their accounts while taking a significant share of their income.

The investigation, which spoke to 60 creators in the UK and examined contracts and online discussions among managers, found claims of coercive behaviour, account control and agencies taking up to 70 per cent of creators' earnings.

Keep ReadingShow less