Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

22,000 students asked to return loans over weekend course issue

Students on weekend courses received letters from the Student Loans Company (SLC) or their universities stating that maintenance loans and childcare grants had been awarded in error.

Students

Maintenance loans are paid directly to students to cover living costs, while tuition fees are paid to universities.

Representational image: Getty

MORE than 22,000 students have been told to repay maintenance loans and grants after being informed their courses were not eligible.

Students on weekend courses received letters from the Student Loans Company (SLC) or their universities stating that maintenance loans and childcare grants had been awarded in error.


One letter seen by the BBC said the university had provided incorrect information and “unfortunately, they didn't tell us you only attended on the weekend”, adding that any “over-payment” must be repaid.

The BBC reported that the issue affects courses at 15 institutions, including London Met, Bath Spa, Leeds Trinity, Southampton Solent and Oxford Brookes. Many of the courses involved weekend teaching, with some online learning during the week.

In a joint statement via Universities UK, the institutions said the issue followed an “abrupt” government decision and that legal action was being considered. The Department for Education said students had been let down by “incompetence or abuse of the system”.

Maintenance loans are paid directly to students to cover living costs, while tuition fees are paid to universities. Some affected students also received childcare grants.

National Union of Students president Amira Campbell said students were “devastated”. “They're worried, they're not sleeping, they don't know where they're going to find the money,” she said.

Khawaja Ahsan, a student at the University of West London, told BBC: “I feel betrayed and massively let down.”

The SLC advised students to seek support if repayments cause “financial difficulties”. Universities said they were seeking clarification and focusing on support, while the government said institutions must act.

More For You

Starmer calls lack of disclosure over Mandelson vetting ‘frankly staggering’

Starmer said on three occasions that “full due process” was followed in Mandelson’s appointment

Getty Images

Starmer calls lack of disclosure over Mandelson vetting ‘frankly staggering’

Highlights

  • Starmer accepts he unknowingly misled MPs over Mandelson's failed security checks.
  • Foreign Office overruled vetting recommendation and kept Starmer in the dark.
  • Top civil servant Sir Olly Robbins sacked and set to face MPs on Tuesday.
Keir Starmer has said it is “frankly staggering” that ministers were not informed about the failed security vetting of Peter Mandelson, insisting he does not accept that senior figures could have been kept in the dark at multiple stages of the process.
He said he should have been told before Mandelson took up the Washington post, that the cabinet secretary should have been informed during a 2025 review, and that the foreign secretary should have known when addressing a select committee.
Downing Street has insisted the prime minister would never knowingly mislead parliament and that he was himself misled by the Foreign Office.
His official spokesperson said the information about Mandelson's failed vetting should have been provided to parliament, to Starmer and to other government ministers, but was not.

Starmer had told the Commons on three separate occasions that "full due process" was followed when Mandelson was appointed US ambassador.

That position has now unravelled following revelations that United Kingdom Security Vetting recommended against Mandelson's security clearance before he took up the Washington post.

Keep ReadingShow less