ENGLISH author PG Wodehouse is loved all over the world, but in India he has an especially devoted following.
Ben Schott is a 46-year-old British journalist and author who received rave reviews for his first Wodehouse novel, Jeeves and the King of Clubs. He has just published a second, Jeeves and the Leap of Faith, and has a theory as to why Wodehouse is so popular with Indians.
He reckons it is all to do with India’s love of the English language, which today is no longer a foreign tongue despite posturing by some nationalistic politicians. Along with “Bollywood Hindi”, it is really India’s link language.
Speaking from New York, where he has been spending lockdown, Schott says: “I think there’s a real sense in which the ludic, playful, fun, slang nature of language plays into an Indian sensibility of fun and playful language. And, you know, a great turn of phrase is a very Indian thing.
“I personally think it’s about the words and the phrases as much as it’s about the plots and the absurdity. To me it’s about the language and I’ve always thought Indian English has a real playful, creative, colourful spring in its step. And I think maybe that’s the link.”
Schott has never been to India, but was due to pay his first visit to the country earlier this year when, no doubt, his sessions at the Jaipur Literary Festival and the Kolkata Literary Meet would have been packed out.
“Tragically, I had to cancel my visit after the death of my father-in-law,” he says. “I very much hope to make new plans.”
In the first novel, Schott “leads Jeeves and Wooster on an uproarious adventure of espionage through the secret corridors of Whitehall”. In the second, “the Drones Club’s in peril, Gussie’s in love, Spode’s on the warpath and Oh, His Majesty’s Government needs a favour. I say – it’s a good thing Bertie’s back!”
The second novel begins with Bertie Wooster agreeing to having his Mayfair flat decorated, but Jeeves does not entirely approve of his master’s choice of wallpaper for the bedroom, for example. Jeeves thinks “Periwinkle Chevron is really most soothing” and that it “combines delicacy with elegance”. But Bertie insists it should be “Jorrock’s Jaunts and Jollities”, holding up “a hunting scene replete with foxes, hounds and horsemen in pink”.
“What do you think, Jeeves?”
“I think, sir, it would suit the saloon bar of a rural public house?”
“Au cointreau (sic). It is spirited and chipper, and will cheer me every morn.”
No marks for guessing how this battle of wills is going to end.
At the Drones Club, meanwhile, where Bertie decides to dine, there is a crisis on two fronts. Bertie’s chum from school, Gussie Fink-Nottle, has broken up with his fiancée, “a spirited lass by the name of Emerald Stoker”, because she has shown a distinct aversion to his beloved newts.
The committee of the Drones – Boko Fittleworth in the chair, flanked by Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps, Stilton Cheesewright, and Bimbash Kidd – was meeting to discuss the club’s financial predicament, a demand for £100,000 in back tax.
Indian accountants will be amused to learn that the committee’s idea of “long-term capital growth underpinned by portfolio diversification” involved “hedging a number of hefty equine bets with wagers on Wimbledon, Henley, the Eton- Harrow match, and Freddie Bullivant’s performance in the inter-club snooker”.
The problem is summed up eloquently: “The letter in Stilton’s paw was from the Commissioners of His Majesty’s Inland Revenue who had adjudicated, most unsportingly, that the investment committee had erred in declaring gambling losses as a deductible business expense. Since this had been club policy for generations, more than half a century of back tax and compounded fines were now due.”
Schott’s two novels have been written with the blessings of the Wodehouse estate. “Writing a Wodehouse novel is, I mean, it’s like being lent the Crown Jewels, you know, you want to polish them,” he acknowledges. “You don’t want to drop them.”
He emphasises that he is not trying to copy Wodehouse, but is writing “in parallel with ‘Plum’”. Each of Wodehouse’s characters “speaks with a different voice, cadence and vocabulary”, he adds.
“Nobody uses language like him. He’s got 1,525 quotes in the OED [Oxford English Dictionary] and 26 first usages.
“When penning my homages, I approach the keyboard not with a grand, personal vision, but as a deadly serious frivolity,” Schott explains.
“The aim is to create a fabulous, literary ‘Heath Robinson machine’ – deploying all of the pulleys, levers, and lengths of knotted rope offered by the Wodehouse oeuvre to create the finest, funniest, and most charming Wooster works possible.
“I aim to eschew caricature, pastiche, and, most banal of all, parody.
“This means respecting his rhythm and rhyme, and not over-reaching. Wodehouse was a genius. I merely scribble in the great man’s shadow.”
Schott has set the tales in the same period as Wodehouse. “Fans of Jeeves and Wooster will immediately get that it’s set in the same time period and with the same characters.”
He has made it a point not to depict Bertie as a complete buffoon, but endowed him with a fair bit of intelligence. “I actually think he’s smarter than people think. I don’t think Jeeves would spend 11 novels or 35 short stories with a complete buffoon. If Bertie was an idiot, and he wrote the books like an idiot, we couldn’t read them, they would be terrible.”
Schott was introduced to Wodehouse, arguably the greatest comic writer in the English language, in his childhood. “They were read to me by my father [when I was] in bed. He would read to me at night and he could do the voices. My father refused to read books that he didn’t enjoy himself. Whether I understood all of that I’d be very surprised.
“But it was really the love of the language, just the incredible silliness of it all. And the fact that silliness was taken seriously, and it takes a craftsman like Woodhouse to write something that is sort of evanescent but actually has real structure and thought.”
Both of Schott’s Wodehouse novels seem perfect for lockdown: “Reginald Jeeves first stepped onto the page in 1915 – in the middle of the First World War. Since then he and his irrepressible master have offered the penicillin of comic sunshine to millions – ameliorating tragedy and uplifting triumph.
“As we await an end to this terrible trauma, I wonder if the world has ever needed Jeeves and Wooster more?”
Suhas Subramanyam speaks during the House Oversight And Government Reform Committee meeting at the US Capitol on March 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
INDIAN AMERICAN Congressman Suhas Subramanyam has strongly condemned recent attacks on Hindu temples across the US, saying that every American should be able to practise their faith without fear.
Speaking on the floor of the House of Representatives, Subramanyam said: “Hate has no place in our communities, and that’s why I condemn the recent hateful attacks on Hindu temples and mandirs all across the country.”
The Democratic lawmaker highlighted several recent incidents, including the desecration of the BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir in Greenwood, Indiana, and gunfire directed at the ISKCON Sri Radha Krishna Temple in Spanish Fork, Utah.
“These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a rise in violence and division in our country,” he said. “It’s not just temples that are being attacked. All places of worship are at risk.”
Subramanyam, who represents Virginia’s 10th Congressional District, urged more resources to strengthen security at religious sites.
“We must be committed to doing more to combat the rise in hate that we’re experiencing in the United States and ensure that our communities are protected. I will continue to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to do that,” he added.
The ISKCON temple in Utah reported that 20 to 30 bullets were fired at the building while devotees were inside, causing heavy damage to its carved arches. Similar acts of vandalism have taken place at BAPS temples in New York, Los Angeles and Sacramento. Last month, the Bay Area Shiv Durga Temple in Santa Clara, California, was also attacked.
Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi earlier condemned the break-in at the Santa Clara temple “in the strongest terms possible” and called for those responsible to face justice. He said such crimes were part of a troubling rise in attacks on Hindu temples. “In America, everyone should be able to pray in peace and safety,” he said.
In a separate incident, the Sri Panchamukha Hanuman Temple in Dublin, California, was burgled last week, with thieves taking jewellery and cash worth about $34,000. It was the second burglary at the site this year. Police said they are still investigating and that there is no evidence so far to suggest religious prejudice as a motive.
Subramanyam, a lawyer by profession, previously served as a White House technology policy adviser to President Barack Obama before entering politics.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Charlie Kirk, 31, shot dead at Utah Valley University during a student event; shooter still at large.
FBI falsely announced an arrest, later retracting the claim, raising questions about investigation handling.
Retired Canadian Michael Mallinson wrongly accused online as the shooter; misinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Security at the event was minimal, with no bag checks.
The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a student event at Utah Valley University has left the nation shaken and investigators scrambling. The 31-year-old was fatally shot in the neck while answering questions under a campus tent, in what officials are calling a sniper-style attack. The shooter remains at large, and the aftermath has exposed investigative missteps, rampant misinformation, and a dangerous level of political vitriol that threatens to push an already polarised America closer to the edge.
Charlie Kirk shot dead at Utah Valley University Getty Images
Manhunt or mismanagement?
While Kirk’s body was still en route to the morgue, the FBI announced an arrest. FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X that a “subject” was in custody, then later wrote that the individual had been released after interrogation, statements that conflicted with those of other local officials and added to early confusion about whether a suspect was actually detained.
Within hours, the Bureau retracted the statement. No shooter was in custody. Instead, one man, George Zinn, had been detained and charged only with obstruction before being released; officials say he was not tied to the shooting. The actual assassin remained at large, likely dressed in dark clothing, armed with a rifle, and vanished from a rooftop roughly 137–183 metres from the stage. Authorities later said they recovered a bolt-action rifle believed to have been used.
This embarrassment for the agency came on the same day three former senior FBI officials filed a federal lawsuit alleging politically motivated firings and accusing leadership, including Director Kash Patel, of politicising bureau personnel decisions.
— (@)
Digital witch hunt
While investigators combed through footage and witness statements, the internet took matters into its own hands.
Michael Mallinson, a 77-year-old Canadian retiree, became the face of the assassination online after a fake Fox News account posted his photo alongside the caption: “This is the shooter.”
The post went viral. Thousands shared it. Hate poured in. Even automated tools and chatbots (including xAI’s Grok) echoed the false identification proving how AI and social platforms can amplify misinformation in real time.
Mallinson was nowhere near Utah. He had not left Toronto. On YouTube, creators used footage of Kirk’s killing as clickbait. On Telegram and fringe platforms, users celebrated his death.
Graphic footage circulated widely, reposted by some YouTube and TikTok channels and amplified on fringe and encrypted platforms, where pockets of users celebrated the killing. The assassination was not just a news event, it became content.
— (@)
Security failures laid bare
Kirk was a controversial figure. He knew it. His team knew it. Yet security at the event was shockingly lax. Students and attendees say no bag checks were conducted. While Kirk had private security alongside six university officers, the setup was more suited to crowd control than to the threat of a long-range attack. The shooter used that exposure to their advantage
The killing has reverberated far beyond Utah. Donald Trump called Kirk “legendary,” while Turning Point affiliates in the UK and Australia declared him a martyr. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán blamed “the international hate campaign of the liberal left,” while Italy’s Giorgia Meloni called it “a deep wound for democracy.”
This swift politicisation has in fact deepened divides, with experts warning that framing the death in martyrdom terms risks fuelling further violence.
— (@)
The human toll
Behind the politics, violence and digital noise remains the wreckage of a young family. His wife Erika now faces raising two children who were close enough to hear the shot that killed their father. Public figures offered condolences and leaders across the political spectrum described it as a tragedy and warned against political violence.
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is more than a criminal case. It is a failure of security, a test of law enforcement credibility, and a mirror held up to the toxic speed of misinformation. The shooter is still free, and the questions are multiplying about safety, accountability, and how political violence is inflamed.
Charlie Kirk stands in the back of the room as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremonyGetty Images
The investigation will eventually name a suspect. But no arrest will erase the fact that a man was gunned down in front of his family, and that the aftermath, from false custody claims to viral lies, has made a fractured nation feel even more unstable. Not in abstract political terms, but in the daily lives of people who now fear rallies, campuses, and speech. That is the cost we can least afford to ignore.
Keep ReadingShow less
Prince Harry visits the Centre for Blast Injury Studies at Imperial College London, in London, Britain, September 10, 2025. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett
PRINCE HARRY had tea with King Charles on Wednesday (10) at their first meeting in 20 months, in what may prove a first step toward ending a much-publicised rift between father and son.
Harry, the Duke of Sussex, last saw his father in February 2024, shortly after it was announced that the king was undergoing treatment for an unspecified form of cancer.
Buckingham Palace confirmed that Charles, 76, had a private tea at Clarence House in London with his son on Wednesday.
Harry, 40, travelled directly to an Invictus Games event in London after the meeting. Asked by a reporter about his father, he said: "Yes, he's great, thank you."
Harry flew into Britain on Monday (8) for a series of engagements, and earlier on Wednesday visited a research centre which specialises in improving treatment for victims with blast injuries.
Since Harry and his American wife Meghan moved to California in 2020 where they now live with their two children, they have been highly critical of the royal family and the institution in interviews, TV documentaries and Harry's autobiography Spare.
Harry had some particularly barbed comments for Charles and his elder brother, heir-to-the-throne Prince William, leading to a total breakdown in his relationship with his family.
"Of course some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book. Of course they will never forgive me for lots of things. But you know ... I would love reconciliation with my family. ... There's no point in continuing to fight anymore. And life is precious," he told the BBC.
"I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile."
Buckingham Palace and Harry's representatives had been tight-lipped ahead of the prince's visit to Britain about whether there would be a meeting with the king.
However, Charles' communications chief and Harry's media representatives were pictured in July at a secret meeting in London in what newspapers suggested might be the first steps towards a reconciliation.
Historian and author Anthony Seldon said mending their relationship was important for the monarchy and for both Charles and Harry as individuals.
"The king is the king, but he's also a human being and a loving father," Seldon told Reuters. "I think the rift will have caused both of them a lot of anguish. So if that can be healed, at least in part, now or subsequently, then that's all to the good."
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
The commemoration event honoured two South Asian WW2 veterans who died this year, Havildar Major Rajindar Singh Dhatt MBE and Sergeant Mohammad Hussain.
TWO South Asian Second World War veterans were honoured at a commemoration event in London on Wednesday, September 10. The ceremony paid tribute to Havildar Major Rajindar Singh Dhatt MBE and Sergeant Mohammad Hussain, who both died this year.
The event, hosted by British Future and Eastern Eye with support from the Royal British Legion, also launched My Family Legacy, a project to raise awareness of South Asian contributions in the world wars and preserve family stories for future generations.
More than 2.5 million people from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka served in the Second World War, forming the largest volunteer army in history. New polling by Focaldata, released alongside the launch, found that only half of the UK public – and fewer than six in ten British Asians – know that Indian soldiers served in the war.
Sunder Katwala, Director of British Future, said: “We should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history. Ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains important work in progress. My Family Legacy aims to help people to find, document and tell these family stories of courage and contribution, service and sacrifice in the world wars.”
Gail Walters, Director of Network Engagement at the Royal British Legion, said: “Honouring the South Asian soldiers who served in Britain’s World Wars is about remembering their bravery and also gives a fuller picture of our shared history. The service and sacrifice of South Asian soldiers are integral to Britain’s national story and helped build the country we are today.”
Amrit Kaur Dhatt, granddaughter of Havildar Major Dhatt, said: “It is so important to capture stories of Commonwealth and ethnic minority soldiers, like my grandfather’s, because they were left out of mainstream history. I find that even the disparity and awareness between VE and VJ Day remains shockingly significant. But remembering isn’t just about the past. It is about shaping the future. And I fear that today’s society clearly hasn’t learnt enough from history. Baba Ji had always hoped that future generations would never have to see the devastation that they [war veterans] had to endure.”
Ejaz Hussain, granddaughter of Sergeant Hussain, said: “As the last soldiers of the war fade before our eyes, it remains imperative that we capture their stories. We - as a country and a people - are blessed to be here today, enjoying liberty and safety directly because of the sacrifices of those from the greatest generation, of which my grandfather was one.”
Journalist Sangita Myska said: “Honouring the service given by South Asian soldiers is vital to understanding the intertwined and complex relationship forged by our forebears with Britain.”
Actor Adil Ray OBE said: “This is the greatest war story that’s never been told. Millions of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs from India, today’s Pakistan and Bangladesh fought two world wars, fighting for our freedom. We owe everything to Major Dhatt and Sergeant Hussain and their fellow soldiers. Their history is our history.”
IT WILL be a two-way contest between education secretary Bridget Phillipson and former Commons leader Lucy Powell for the post of Labour’s deputy leader after Emily Thornberry and Paula Barker withdrew from the race on Thursday (11).
Thornberry, who chairs the Commons foreign affairs committee, had secured 13 nominations from Labour MPs while Barker, the Liverpool Wavertree MP, had 14, well short of the 80 needed to progress.
Their withdrawals follow that of housing minister Alison McGovern, who pulled out on Wednesday (10) and backed Phillipson. Bell Ribeiro-Addy, MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, remains in the running but with 15 nominations is unlikely to make the threshold by the 5pm deadline.
Phillipson has already secured 116 nominations, well above the requirement, while Powell has 77 and is expected to cross the line with late support.
The contest was triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, who admitted underpaying stamp duty on a flat and stepped down as deputy leader and deputy prime minister last week.
Her departure has left a gap in Labour’s leadership at a time when prime minister Sir Keir Starmer is managing his first year in government.
Thornberry, announcing her withdrawal on social media, said she was “deeply grateful” for the backing she received and described it as “a privilege to take part in this race with such brilliant women”. Barker said the next deputy leader must be willing to challenge the government when necessary and later endorsed Powell as someone who could be “a constructive friend to the government”.
Phillipson, a long-standing MP for Houghton and Sunderland South, has presented herself as a candidate with experience in Cabinet and the ability to take on populist threats, while Powell, who was removed as leader of the Commons during last week’s reshuffle, has argued she can devote herself fully to the deputy leadership role without ministerial duties.
Supporters of Powell say she offers a voice more independent of the leadership, while Phillipson’s backers highlight her loyalty and strong performance as education secretary.
The next stage of the contest will see candidates who meet the MP threshold secure backing from either five per cent of local constituency parties or three affiliated organisations, including at least two trade unions, in order to make the final ballot.
Voting among Labour members and affiliated supporters opens on October 8 and closes on October 23, with the winner to be announced on October 25.
The result will not affect the role of deputy prime minister, which has already been filled by David Lammy, but it will decide who takes the deputy leadership of the Labour party at a time of internal debate about direction and priorities.
The race, widely expected to run through Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool later this month, is seen as a test of party unity and the balance between loyalty to the leadership and space for dissent.
Senior figures have said they want the next deputy leader to be a woman and from outside London to address perceptions of a male-dominated and London-centric leadership.
Both Phillipson and Powell fit that profile, raising expectations that the final outcome will be decided not on geography but on whether members prefer a loyal cabinet figure or an independent backbencher with more freedom to speak out.