Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

What faith says about euthanasia

What faith says about euthanasia
There are emotional arguments both for and against the proposed law change

MY UNCLE, who died, aged 88, in August, would have turned 89 last week.

He had been suffering from vascular dementia, but the idea of assisted dying would have horrified him. In fact, three days before he died, he told me he wanted to have a big party when he returned from hospital. He did go home for 24 hours, but deteriorated so sharply overnight he had to be rushed back to hospital, with me in the ambulance alongside him.


Among British Asians, there hasn’t been much of a demand I can detect for Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s terminally ill adults (end of life) bill for England and Wales. Scotland is also considering a change in the law.

We have all heard the emotional arguments, both for and against such a bill. Who can fail to be moved?

At present, laws across the UK prevent people from asking for medical help to die. If the bill becomes law, it would give people, in certain circumstances, the right to die at a time of their choosing. Invariably, there will be abuses, possibly where substantial inheritances are at stake.

I tried to look up the Hindu view on euthanasia and suicide. Most would say that assisting death brings bad karma, because it violates the non-violence principle. But there are accepted Hindu ways to bring about death.

Most Hindus would say that “a doctor should not accept a patient’s request for euthanasia since this will cause the soul and body to be separated at an unnatural time. The result will damage the karma of both doctor and patient.

“Hindus believe in the reincarnation of the soul (or atma) through many lives – not necessarily all human. The ultimate aim of life is to achieve moksha, liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth.

“A soul’s next life is decided by karma, as the consequence of its own good or bad actions in previous lives. The karma somehow represents the net worth of the soul’s good and bad actions. A soul cannot achieve moksha without good karma.

“Killing (euthanasia, murder, suicide) interferes with the killed soul’s progress towards liberation. When the soul is reincarnated in another physical body, it will suffer as it did before because the same karma is still present.”

For the time being, it seems best not to change the law.

More For You

Will Britain’s immigration debate catch up with the reality of falling numbers?

An inflatable 'small boat' carrying migrants crosses the channel after leaving northern France on April 27, 2026 in Dover, England.

Getty Images

Will Britain’s immigration debate catch up with the reality of falling numbers?

Sunder Katwala

“Net migration has fallen 82 per cent. My government is delivering”, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer tweeted, celebrating fewer people coming to Britain.

Falling immigration may be Britain’s best kept political secret. Only one in six people know that net migration fell last year or think it will fall this year, according to British Future’s new Immigration Attitudes Tracker research. Half think immigration is still rising. Yet the drops are dramatic. Net migration halved from 800,000 to 400,000 in the first year, then more than halved again to 171,000 in 2025. Few at Westminster have yet clocked that net migration is set to halve again this year, dropping below 100,000 for the first time this century.

That could make 2026 the year when falling immigration becomes harder to ignore. Would it be a political triumph for Labour to actually hit that old “tens of thousands” net migration target that [former Conservative prime minister] Theresa May always missed? That does come with a catch. This government needs to decide how big a price-tag it is willing to swallow for lower immigration. The Treasury numbers added up by estimating an average inflow of 235,000 a year for the rest of this parliament. But that will surely be at least 100,000 higher than reality now. Whether that fiscal adjustment is £13 bn or doubles to £25 bn depends on how low net migration goes. That is a big opportunity-cost choice about government priorities that the Starmer cabinet has never properly considered.

Keep ReadingShow less