Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Shamima Begum’s ‘British’ baby tragedy

by Amit Roy

THE news that Shamima Begum had lost her baby son, when he might possibly have responded to medical care in the UK, was heartrending.


Perhaps the home secretary, Sajid Javid, who stripped her of her British nationality, thereby

making her stateless because she doesn’t have Bangladeshi nationality, should – exceptionally – review her case and let her back into Britain.

Most people don’t have sympathy for Shamima’s pro-Daesh political views and feel she is responsible for her own misfortune, but they are not heartless either. She is only 19 and lost three babies in succession. Surely, she has suffered enough.

Shamima is not the only problem for the home secretary, who has to consider the possible

long-term consequences of allowing in dozens of other Britons, many brainwashed by extremist ideology, and their children born in Syria.

Javid might have wanted to appear tough, but the decision has now backfired on him. For once, the shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, reflected the views of many people when she tweeted: “It is against international law to make someone stateless, and now an innocent child has died as a result of a British woman being stripped of her citizenship. This is callous and inhumane.”

She later added: “This week a British baby died from pneumonia in a Syrian refugee camp. A tragedy that might have been avoided. If the mother and baby had been brought home, the mother Shamima Begum would have faced British justice, but the baby might have lived. Sajid Javid has behaved shamefully.”

Javid is also being targeted by his enemies in the Conservative Party who are putting the knife in so as to undermine his chances of succeeding Theresa May as prime minister.

Conservative MP Phillip Lee declared he was “deeply concerned” by Javid’s decision, which

was “driven by a sort of populism”, he claimed.

“Clearly Shamima Begum holds abhorrent views and to want to join Islamic State is beyond

all comprehension, but she was a child, a product of our society,” he argued.

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Ed Davey said the boy will be remembered if courts rule that Javid acted “illegally in making a British citizen stateless”. “Many of us feared this tragic outcome when the home secretary washed his hands of Britain’s responsibility for a British citizen and a British baby,” he added.

More For You

Can progressives find a response to populism?

British prime minister Keir Starmer delivers his keynote speech at Britain's Labour Party's annual conference in Liverpool, Britain, on September 30, 2025

Reuters

Can progressives find a response to populism?

Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer’s declaration that the next election is “a battle for the soul of the country, exemplifies how Reform leader Nigel Farage’s new frontrunner status made him the main target of his political opponents during this year’s party conference.

"Don't let Trump’s America become Farage's Britain" was LibDem leader Ed Davey’s theme in Bournemouth. That was a confident, liberal message with an appeal to most people in this country. Davey’s literal Trump card is that he is the most prominent politician being willing to openly criticise a US president who three-quarters of the British public disapprove of. It passes the ‘tik-tok test' of being communicable in three seconds to those paying little attention to politics.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK recognising Palestine is better late than never

Destroyed buildings in the besieged Palestinian territory last Wednesday (17)

UK recognising Palestine is better late than never

PRIME MINISTER Sir Keir Starmer was, if anything, a little late in coming to the party when he accorded formal recognition of a Palestinian state last Sunday (21).

India did so on November 18, 1988, two days after Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Keep ReadingShow less
anti-immigration rally

A man holds a flag that reads "We want our country back," as protesters gather on the day of an anti-immigration rally organised by British anti-immigration activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson, in London, Britain, September 13, 2025.

Reuters

Comment: Why are we going backwards on racism in Britain?

WHY ARE we going backwards on racism in Britain? How disappointing to have to ask that in 2025. I have long been an optimist about the future of multi-ethnic Britain, because I felt my country change for the better in each of the four decades since I left primary school. The vocal overt racism on the football terraces of my teenage years was largely shown the red card by the mid-1990s. This century saw much more ethnic minority presence in professional and public life.

But it has got harder to be optimistic this autumn, because of lived experience too. I personally get so much more racist abuse most weeks in 2025 than I ever did in 2005. Black and Asian people have increasingly equal opportunities to reach the top, but a viscerally and unacceptably unequal experience of public space. The worst racist trolls openly boast online of their sense of impunity for racist abuse: a sentiment spilling out in surges of racist graffiti on bus stops, Chinese restaurants, even the playground in my local park.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Is the UK edging closer to its own Trump moment?

Thames Valley Police officers conduct security checks in Windsor last Friday (12) ahead of Donald Trump’s state visit

Comment: Is the UK edging closer to its own Trump moment?

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s visit sees the British state deploy all of its pomp and pageantry to stroke his ego. King Charles has the constitutional duty of pretending to like the American president, as his UK government seeks to limit the economic damage and diplomatic fallout of this more volatile second Trump term.

But could Trump’s presence provide a spectre of British politics yet to come? He arrives with Reform leader Nigel Farage riding high in the polls, and after Tommy Robinson’s mass rally in London.

Keep ReadingShow less
Baffling cabinet reshuffle

Piyush Goyal with Jonathan Reynolds at Chequers during the signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement in July

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

IN SIR KEIR STARMER’S cabinet reshuffle last week, triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, the prime minister shifted Jonathan Reynolds from business and trade secretary and president of the board of trade after barely a year in the post to chief whip, making him responsible for the party.

The move doesn’t make much sense. At Chequers, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement was signed by Reynolds, and the Indian commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal. They had clearly established a friendly working relationship.

Keep ReadingShow less