THE news that Shamima Begum had lost her baby son, when he might possibly have responded to medical care in the UK, was heartrending.
Perhaps the home secretary, Sajid Javid, who stripped her of her British nationality, thereby
making her stateless because she doesn’t have Bangladeshi nationality, should – exceptionally – review her case and let her back into Britain.
Most people don’t have sympathy for Shamima’s pro-Daesh political views and feel she is responsible for her own misfortune, but they are not heartless either. She is only 19 and lost three babies in succession. Surely, she has suffered enough.
Shamima is not the only problem for the home secretary, who has to consider the possible
long-term consequences of allowing in dozens of other Britons, many brainwashed by extremist ideology, and their children born in Syria.
Javid might have wanted to appear tough, but the decision has now backfired on him. For once, the shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, reflected the views of many people when she tweeted: “It is against international law to make someone stateless, and now an innocent child has died as a result of a British woman being stripped of her citizenship. This is callous and inhumane.”
She later added: “This week a British baby died from pneumonia in a Syrian refugee camp. A tragedy that might have been avoided. If the mother and baby had been brought home, the mother Shamima Begum would have faced British justice, but the baby might have lived. Sajid Javid has behaved shamefully.”
Javid is also being targeted by his enemies in the Conservative Party who are putting the knife in so as to undermine his chances of succeeding Theresa May as prime minister.
Conservative MP Phillip Lee declared he was “deeply concerned” by Javid’s decision, which
was “driven by a sort of populism”, he claimed.
“Clearly Shamima Begum holds abhorrent views and to want to join Islamic State is beyond
all comprehension, but she was a child, a product of our society,” he argued.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Ed Davey said the boy will be remembered if courts rule that Javid acted “illegally in making a British citizen stateless”. “Many of us feared this tragic outcome when the home secretary washed his hands of Britain’s responsibility for a British citizen and a British baby,” he added.
Diplomacy competes for attention in a crowded news cycle.European Council president Antonio Costa, Britain’s prime minister Keir Starmer and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen with members of the Royal Navy in central London last Monday (19), during a summit aimed at resetting UK–EU ties
THERE is just too much news. The last month probably saw more than a year’s worth of events in more normal times – a new Pope in Rome, continued war in Ukraine, escalating conflict in Gaza, and the relief of India and Pakistan agreeing a ceasefire after a fortnight of conflict.
Domestic and global events that might once have dominated the news for a week can now come and go within hours. The biggest-ever fall in net migration – 2024’s figure half of 2023’s, according to Office for National Statistics data released last Thursday (22) – did not even get a brief mention on any of last Friday (23) morning’s newspaper front pages. It would have been a very different story if net migration had doubled, not halved, but falling immigration risks becoming something of a secret.
On the same evening as the UK-EU ‘reset’ summit, the UK government issued its strongest criticism of Israel in living memory. A joint statement with Canada and France described conditions in Gaza as ‘intolerable’, the language of Israeli ministers as ‘abhorrent’, and its expanded military operation as ‘egregious’. Germany did not join the trio, yet Chancellor Merz’s explanation that Germany would exercise more restraint in its criticism of Israel than others, for historical reasons – made his own calm but stark warning about breaching international humanitarian law more striking.
Israel had strong diplomatic support after the October 7 Hamas attack, but has never been this isolated. The administration of US president Donald Trump has not joined the public criticism, but is much cooler to Benjamin Netanyahu than in Trump’s first term, with sharp private clashes over diplomacy versus war with Iran.
Trump’s second term has turned the Oval Office into a reality politics show, giving the president the ‘main character’ energy he craves. He is at war with the courts and universities at home, last week seeking to ban all international students from Harvard.
America’s allies must second-guess his impulsive unilateralism on security and trade. The February clash with Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky sent shockwaves around the world. Trump is now frustrated that conceding so much to Russian president Vladimir Putin achieved nothing – except losing leverage. Repeating the trick last week, ambushing South African president Cyril Ramaphosa with fabricated footage of a racist conspiracy theory about the genocide of white farmers, had a weary familiarity. There was sympathy for Ramaphosa at home and abroad. Trump lacks any evident tariff strategy, simply hiking and suspending rates to maintain surprise. Business expects little stability while the Trump presidential gameshow runs.
Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has the opposite instincts and personality to Trump, believing in a rules-based world order – both on principle and in Britain’s enlightened self-interest as a middle power. Starmer’s challenge is to show that cooperation can work – for security, trade and boats in the Channel too. Whitehall sees progress in a volatile world in the trade deal with India, mitigating some of Trump’s car tariffs at least, while prioritising the UK-EU reset.
The ‘Brexit betrayal’ headlines had little impact on public opinion, where there is broad pragmatic permission to pursue closer UK-EU ties within current ‘red line’ commitments – ruling out single market membership, at least this parliament, to avoid a return to Brexit trenches.
Despite fierce clashes at Westminster over the value and cost of the Chagos Treaty, that seemed one controversy too many for most people to process.
The Starmer government’s juggling of events saw its biggest domestic Uturn, heeding criticism of its plan to means-test the winter fuel allowance for pensioners.
The irony is that this became the government’s most famous decision because chancellor Rachel Reeves did not just include it in her first budget, but led with it as a symbol of ‘tough choices’ for fiscal responsibility. Backbench pressure to reduce child poverty by scrapping the twochild cap on welfare has been accepted too. These U-turns send the government back to the drawing board after its first year.
This summer and autumn, it must not only revise plans for spending and taxation, but also articulate a public narrative – a strategy that explains what the government’s choices amount to, and why. A comparative strength of populist insurgents is that they offer a simpler story about a complex world than their mainstream rivals.
News fatigue is rising across countries, according to Reuters Institute research conducted over the past decade. Around four in 10 people are avoiding the news – for a variety of reasons. If everything, everywhere, all at once remains the theme of politics and global affairs, the risk is more people will simply switch off.
Sunder Katwala
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Actor babil khan recently had a public breakdown on instagram, sharing a concerning video that was later deleted. those close to the 27-year-old son of the late star irrfan khan have since said he is doing fine. however, the incident highlights the urgent need to take mental health more seriously across all areas of society, including among high-profile figures in the film industry. it also serves as a reminder that anyone who is struggling should be encouraged to reach out for help.
Babil Khan
POOR ADVERT
It was recently revealed that, in terms of brand endorsements, Ananya Panday is one of the most visible celebrities on Indian television. The fact that an actress with limited talent and an underwhelming film record has become a go-to face for advertisers reflects the current state of popular culture in India. While she cannot be faulted for making the most of these opportunities, one would hope that those investing in such campaigns could find more compelling representatives to promote their products.
Ananya Panday
FILM FESTIVAL HERO
The annual UK Asian Film Festival delivered a vibrant 27th edition with another action-packed programme celebrating cinema. Founder and festival director Dr Pushpinder Chowdhry deserves particular praise for being the driving force from day one and providing a valuable international platform to filmmakers from around the world.
The great British champion told me the festival’s strong ethos has always inspired the dedicated team to use their platform to challenge norms, build empathy and bring communities together. She explained: “The festival themes have always focused on the universal search for identity, connection, and purpose. The films and events we select include stories of displaced immigrants, quests for love, and negotiations between heritage and modern life.
The festival has received strong support from dedicated individuals, communities, and businesses, who believed in our work, reinforcing the idea that storytelling remains a vital force for unity in a divided world. “In an era marked by fear and division, the festival’s programming emphasised that it is not people we should fear, but the forces that seek to silence or divide us.”
SOCIAL MEDIA SUICIDE
One of the most damaging effects of social media influencers is the way they can create unrealistic expectations for young people, including follower counts. Tragically, this pressure recently contributed to the suicide of content creator Misha Agrawal, just two days before her 25th birthday.
Despite building a solid brand and a strong following on Instagram, the founder of Misha Cosmetics reportedly took her own life after falling short of reaching one million followers. This is heartbreaking when you consider that many public figures have large numbers of fake followers. Her death serves as a stark reminder that much more needs to be done to safeguard the mental health of those consumed by online validation.
If you are struggling, help is available. Samaritans offers free, confidential support 24 hours a day on 116 123 or via email at jo@samaritans.org.
Misha Agrawal
PERMISSION TO RETURN
There is another chance to catch the acclaimed theatre production Permission, which had its UK premiere last year. The multi-layered story, which moves between a Heathrow immigration line and a rooftop in Karachi, will be staged at Tara Theatre in London from May 30 to June 7. Writer Hunia Chawla said the play, starring Rea Malhotra Mukhtyar and Anisa Butt, “will make you think, laugh and cry at the same time.”
Permission
BOLLYWOOD’S BAD EXCUSE
It seems as if those connected to Hindi cinema are shamelessly using the current conflict between India and Pakistan to save face.
The recent Bollywood concert headlined by Salman Khan and Madhuri Dixit was cancelled with the Kashmir terror attack cited as the reason – though it was more likely due to poor ticket sales.
Similarly, the last-minute cancellation of Bhool Chuk Maaf, starring Rajkummar Rao, was blamed on cross-border tensions. In reality, this time-loop comedy had generated little buzz or advance interest and seemed destined to flop. Producers had planned to quietly shift the film to a streaming platform, but cinema owners in India took the matter to court, forcing a theatrical release this week. When the film inevitably fails, it may only confirm what many suspected from the start.
Bhool Chuk Maaf
STORY OF A DREAM TEAM
One of this year’s standout music collaborations is between internationally renowned Norwegian music producer Alan Walker and rapidly rising Indian hip hop star King. Their newly released, genre-defying track Story of A Bird is a powerful dance-pop anthem described as a global creative rallying cry. The fusion of Walker’s signature atmospheric EDM production with King’s raw lyricism resonates strongly with a new generation on the rise. These self-made music stars have bridged cultures and sounds, while celebrating the unstoppable spirit of those who dare to dream.
King and Alan Walker
MAGNIFICENT MARK
The recently released season five of comedy series Man Like Mobeen is packed with hilarious moments from start to finish, thanks to its marvellous characters and strong performances. While co-creator Guz Khan is brilliant in the title role, the standout star is once again Mark Silcox, who shines in his superb supporting role as Uncle Shady. He owns every scene he appears in with his deadpan delivery and is so good that a spin-off series – or even a movie – centred on him would be entirely justified. The full season is now available on BBC iPlayer and is well worth watching.
Mark Silcox and Guz Khan
MESMERISING MANASI MANASI
Manasi Ghosh showed exactly why she recently won Indian Idol 15 with stunning performances during her recent UK concerts.
Touring with fellow finalists Anirudh Suswaram and Sneha Shankar, the wonderfully talented singer swept across the stage like a tornado, delivering a terrific range of tracks. Her performance was perfectly complemented by strong stage presence and a charming personality that instantly endeared her to audiences. It is no surprise that this versatile singer won the long-running music reality show and if this UK tour, organised by Rock On Music, is anything to go by, she has a spectacular future ahead.
HIRAN’S HAMLET HURRAH
Hiran Abeysekera has quietly but powerfully established himself as one of the most compelling stage actors of his generation. From his Olivier Award-winning turn in Life of Pi to his recent haunting portrayal of Nathuram Godse in The Father and the Assassin, Abeysekera has brought an intensity, precision and emotional intelligence that continue to captivate audiences.
This autumn, he takes on the demanding title role in Hamlet at the National Theatre’s Lyttelton stage. Few parts test an actor’s range like Shakespeare’s tortured Dane, and few contemporary performers are as well-equipped to take it on. With his gift for balancing vulnerability and charisma, Abeysekera is likely to deliver a Hamlet that feels both deeply human and viscerally modern. This is unlikely to be just another Shakespeare revival, but a potential milestone for one of British theatre’s brightest talents. As his ascent continues, this role may well cement Abeysekera’s place among the greats.
Hiran Abeysekara
Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer polarised opinion within his own party by using language that is not his own
So who was prime minister Sir Keir Starmer trying to sound like on immigration? Not Enoch Powell, surely, though independent former Labour MP Zarah Sultana alleged the ‘rivers of blood’ speech was quoted with intent. Downing Street scrambled to declare any faint echo unintentional. Briefing that Starmer was really summoning the spirit of Roy Jenkins instead - since Labour's most liberal multiculturalist home secretary did not want unlimited immigration - did not reflect his tone.
The prime minister’s language was deliberately tough - much tougher than the white paper he was recommending. Its principles - controlling migration, to bring the record numbers down, while welcoming contributors, managing impacts and promoting cohesion - could resonate across a Labour electoral coalition which includes migration sceptics, liberals and many ‘balancers’ in between.
Yet, Starmer polarised opinion within his own party by using language that is not his own to parrot arguments he cannot fully believe. Starmer began by co-opting Vote Leave’s slogan “take back control”. “Everyone knows what that slogan meant for immigration”, he said.
Yet on Brexit Day in 2020, Starmer was telling his party members he could respect the referendum result, while bringing back free movement (though he later made the opposite pledge to the general public). Starmer’s foreword citing the ‘incalculable damage’ of high immigration felt like clunky plagiarism of former Conservative home secretary Suella Braverman’s warnings about societal collapse. If Starmer believes that too, his white paper should go further towards eliminating net migration, not merely reducing it.
Starmer knows that he did not inherit an ‘open borders’ policy - since the chaotic asylum backlog he inherits was the product of ceasing to process claims. The prime minister could have spoken for this white paper using social democratic arguments that he does believe. At Labour’s last conference, Starmer defended ‘legitimate concerns’ on migration and the need to bring numbers down. Nobody called that Powellite, as it was fused with a repudiation of racism and a clear statement it was ‘toxic’ to blame the migrants who had come to Britain for policy failures of the government.
A measured critique this week from 25 leaders across faith, asking Starmer to lower the temperature noted that the language of ‘incalculable damage’ risks failing this test. A calmer Starmer narrative could still be scathing about the last government saying one thing and doing the opposite. He could be more specific about the promises he can keep to reduce immigration. He was well placed to commit to halving net migration within his first two years in office. A public bruised by broken promises might only believe it when they see it. 460,000 fewer visas in 2024 means the Office of National Statistics will this week report the significant start in cutting net migration within the first six months.
Labour previously opposed a net migration target, so Starmer should offer a Labour argument about why the rate of inflow matters. His most coherent point would be that he wants housing supply to outpace population change comfortably. That is impossible when annual net migration soars above one per cent of the population - but possible if this government committed to keeping that rate below 0.5 per cent - half of the level inherited - while managing it down further where consistent with its growth, training, NHS, climate and education missions. That two-thirds of the public support a new UK-EU youth mobility deal shows the pragmatic permission for managed migration too.
This calmer Starmer should reject the failed tactic of plucking numbers from the air for immigration in five years’ time - and promise instead to report back every year to parliament on numbers, impacts and future policy. That could challenge rivals with slogans about lower levels to make their numbers add up, too. That is how the real-world pragmatists might take back control of the politics of immigration.
Instead, we are debating Powell. Starmer’s contentious “island of strangers” soundbite worried out loud about wanting integration, which Powell declared impossible. But his white paper lacks a coherent agenda on integration. It proposes more migrants - outside graduate jobs - should be guest-workers. More temporary migration sounds like a recipe for more ‘strangers’ as neighbours.
The government proposes that some people who will settle permanently should wait twice as long before becoming British - but offers no evidence about why that would promote integration, not impede it. The distracting guessing game about immigration echoes from past speeches was the symptom of a vacuum in this government’s voice and thinking.
After five years as a party leader, Starmer has yet to offer a substantial public argument about diversity or integration. The conversation about his government’s future is dominated by political tactics - slicing and dicing which voter segments to engage in four years time. Yet the core challenge for the prime minister of this modern Britain is to find his own voice to speak to us all, together, at the same time.
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
Keep ReadingShow less
Paresh Rawal made a murky admission that left fans speechless
Some celebrity confessions make you love them more. Others make you reconsider watching their films during dinner. The latter was the case recently when veteran actor Paresh Rawal made a murky admission that left fans speechless.
Known for his impeccable comic timing and thunderous screen presence, the much-respected star undid decades of admiration by revealing that he willingly drank his own urine for a prolonged period – and is proud of it.
Yes, you read that right. This was not a survival hack or an unfortunate accident. Rawal said he followed the practice for weeks. The revelation came while recounting a serious knee injury he sustained during the filming of Ghatak. According to the actor, late action director Veeru Devgan recommended he drink the first urine of the day upon waking – something he claimed all fighters did for quicker healing. Taking the advice of Ajay Devgn’s father, Rawal followed through for 15 days, sipping it like “an enjoyable alcoholic beverage”. Rather than question whether the injury was truly serious, he insisted it miraculously helped – and said it “worked like magic”. That prompted some to speculate he might have continued the habit ever since.
While honesty is usually admirable, this is perhaps one revelation that should have remained buried, like a naughty person’s internet browser history. Social media users wasted no time unleashing a storm of memes, jokes and mockery. One user even suggested that the forthcoming Phir Hera Pheri sequel should be retitled Pee Hera Pheri.
Medical experts were quick to refute any health benefits. Doctors urged people not to follow Rawal’s example, warning that urine contains waste products and could cause infections rather than healing. They advised sticking to prescribed medication instead of unconventional – and unsanitary – practices.
Unbelievably, Rawal is not alone in this. Akshay Kumar once claimed to be drinking cow urine daily. During the Covid pandemic, certain right-wing politicians promoted similar ideas, suggesting cow urine could cure coronavirus. (Other stars may have disturbing remedies of their own – thankfully, they have kept them hidden.)
Perhaps Rawal thought he was sharing a quirky tale from his early days that would boost fan admiration. But now, many might never look at him the same way. The next time he delivers a line, including fellow cast members, some might wonder, “did he gargle before this take?” (If you are finding this out for the first time, apologies. Spare a thought for those who have had to kiss him.)
The entire episode is a reminder: celebrities should think twice before making dark confessions like this.
Also, while Ajay Devgn is known for his mischievous pranks dating back to the early ’90s, one has to ask – did his strict father Veeru pull off the ultimate one with this bizarre suggestion? (And just in case it needs repeating – the NHS absolutely does not, under any circumstances, recommend drinking your own wee.)
THE best thing that happened to Vaibhav Suryavanshi is that he was out for 0 in the innings that followed his sensational 35-ball century in the Indian Premier League (IPL).
Batting for Rajasthan Royals against Gujarat Titans last week, the 14-year-old took down some of the world’s best bowlers in a 38-ball innings that included 11 sixes and seven fours.
In his very next innings, he was out for a two-ball duck against Mumbai Indians. Then he got 4 against Kolkata Knight Riders.
Such is cricket, the great leveller.
Rajasthan’s bowling coach, Shane Bond, revealed that the team management was being cautious with the teenage talent.
“The coaching staff haven’t tried to complicate things too much with Vaibhav. He’s sort of got a bit of a licence to go out and just play. He’s done an amazing job so far, really, for a 14-year-old. He missed out in the last game, but you don’t really want to panic with someone so young,” Bond said at a prematch press conference.
“I know Vikram (Rathour) talks about his game plans and the type of bowlers that he’s going to come up against and he’ll do that again. But outside of that, he’s a pretty young kid, so I’m happy for him to get out there and keep swinging.”
Bond emphasised the importance of patience when nurturing a player so young.
“He’s obviously a seriously talented player, but he’s also still a kid. So, he’s sort of learning on the go, we’re going to be really patient with him because you have to be. And the other part of it is just all the off-field stuff, the travel, you can’t expect a 14-year-old to be a professional. I’ve got a 16-year-old son. He’s (Suryavanshi) a teenager, so we’re just trying to educate him on the things around and look after him, shield him a little bit from the social media stuff and all the trappings that come with the way he started, but he’s a lovely kid.”
Nigel Farage
Reuters
Born in Samastipur, a small district in the state of Bihar, he quickly showed promise. His father, Sanjeev Suryavanshi, himself a clublevel cricketer, saw a spark in his son. But there were no proper academies in the district, so he started training at home from the age of five.
Failure might help the boy to mature. I remember interviewing Sachin Tendulkar in Mumbai when he was 16, but the sports editor of the Sunday Times – the paper for which I then worked – wouldn’t carry the piece “because we are a national newspaper and we don’t publish stories about little schoolboys”.
All that changed, of course, when Sachin hit his first Test century against England at the age of 17. He went on to make 100 international hundreds – he scored 15,921 runs in Tests, with 51 centuries; and 18,426 runs in ODIs with 49 tons.
Sachin went into cricket because he loved the game. What has changed is that fathers now push their sons (and sometimes daughters, too) into cricket as a way to make the family fortune. Ads featuring cricketers are ubiquitous. It seems like they are more businessmen who also play cricket.
In a curious way, Reform’s success in the local government elections – it triumphed in the Runcorn and Helsby byelection by just six votes and also won 677 council seats – may, in hindsight, prove to be the worst thing to have happened politically to the party’s leader, Nigel Farage.
It’s one thing to make promises in opposition, quite another to be exposed as being ineffective in government. The economic and many other problems that Britain has, including the people who arrive by boat, defy easy solutions. Migrants, legal and illegal, find it easy to get work which local people are no longer willing to do. Farage is trying to ape Donald Trump in America, but he hasn’t said how he is going to encourage the unwilling back to work.
The rise of Reform does pose a dilemma for British Asian voters, especially British Indians, who are seeking a political home. There are some Conservative politicians who say the party should move to the right and form an alliance with Reform. But the Tories cannot win a general election by abandoning the centre ground of British politics.
The prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer, it has been suggested by some commentators, might also move to the right to meet the challenge of Reform. He is apparently considering a reshuffle to give his cabinet a fresh look. Of course, he won’t do what is necessary – move Rachel Reeves.
It is useless for anyone to pretend the chancellor has been a success. Far from raising money for state school teachers, her VAT raid on the private sector has been counterproductive. Every few days a private school closes.
Governors at St Anselm’s prep school near Bakewell in Derbyshire, in the heart of the Peak District – it was founded in 1888 have concluded it is unsustainable in light of government tax changes and falling pupil numbers.
The prime minister won’t move the chancellor, because that would undermine his own credibility. It would have been better if the British electorate had voted in a Labour government, but not with a landslide majority.
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post