Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Scientists should lead review into impact of Covid-19 on minorities

By Amit Roy

THE Labour party announced last week that Sir Keir Starmer had “appointed campaigner and Labour peer Doreen Lawrence to the post of race relations adviser and tasked her with leading a review into the impact of coronavirus on black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities”.


The whole nation has the highest regard and sympathy for Baroness Lawrence, whose 19-year-old son, Stephen, was knifed to death by racist thugs on April 22, 1993.

However, her appointment is baffling. What conclusion can she reach other than that black and Asian deaths from coronavirus have been caused by an institutionally racist government and an uncaring NHS leadership? Perhaps implying on Starmer’s behalf that all would be well if the ethnic minorities – In­dians especially – voted in a Labour government next time round?

What I must stress is that none of this is a personal criticism of Do­reen Lawrence, a dignified mother who has suffered enough.

Starmer’s plus point is that he is not Jeremy Corbyn. He has won plaudits by making it clear that he does not want to play party politics during a national emergency, and that he will engage constructively with the government. But as a poli­tician who wants to be prime minis­ter, he is bound to say, sooner or later, that Boris Johnson is not fit to be returned to power because he handled the pandemic so poorly.

Baroness Lawrence has already put a socio-economic construction on the causes behind the deaths: “Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities have long been disad­vantaged by the social and eco­nomic injustice which still exists in our country. There is a clear and tragic pattern emerging of the im­pact on those communities which must be better understood.”

It is not entirely clear why Starm­er wants a separate inquiry when Public Health England and the NHS are already conducting an investi­gation into the same issue, unless he wants ammunition to use against the government.

The Labour leader said: “It is ex­tremely concerning to see the dis­proportionate toll coronavirus is taking on our BAME communities. We cannot afford to treat this as an issue to investigate once the crisis is over. We must address it now.”

What is needed is a government educational campaign tailored to the needs of the ethnic minorities.

It is a mistake to lump all the ethnic minorities into one basket. The reason why an Indian busi­nessman in Harrow or Wembley is vulnerable to infection is very dif­ferent from the one facing a black bus driver, example.

This was pointed out by a con­sultant psychiatrist in Bristol, Anish Patel, who said that although “the statistical evidence is certainly dis­turbing”, it would be a mistake to lump all ethnic minorities together.

By inference, he dealt with the fact that Indians, for example, do not form part of the deprived com­munities whom the Labour party is keen to represent against an alleg­edly racist government.

Patel pointed out that “even the term BAME is an umbrella category that, for the purposes of data analy­sis, unsatisfactorily binds together a very disparate and heterogeneous group. For example, a refugee from Myanmar, a new immigrant from Ghana and a third-generation Brit­ish citizen from Bangladesh could all be said to be of BAME back­ground. Yet in health terms, they probably have nothing in common. And in socio-economic terms, they are also likely to have very different life experiences.”

He said: “Looking forward, it will be highly instructive to observe how the pandemic has advanced through India and the Caribbean, and compare the data to that of our cities with high proportions of im­migrant communities.”

Patel seemed to make a very per­tinent point about Indians when he added: “Asian households may con­tain three or even four generations of one family, which increases the risk of inter-generational infection and is especially dangerous for el­derly relatives.”

We need top-notch scientists to carry out such inquiries, not race campaigners. Also worth noting is that the Muslim Council of Britain has objected to Sir Trevor Phillips being asked to give “expert sup­port” to Public Health England.

Meanwhile, concern – outrage even – has been expressed about the presence of Johnson’s political hatchet man, Dominic Cummings, at meetings of SAGE, the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emer­gencies. This is seen to have under­mined SAGE’s independence.

A government campaign aimed specifically at Asians is the need of the hour. By and large, poverty is not a problem among Indians. They need to be told not only about hand washing but that the risks are great­er for those with diabetes, high blood pressure and kidney prob­lems. They also need to be made aware of the risk of infection in joint or extended family relationships.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less